{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664",
  "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 90,
  "pageCount": 482,
  "prevPage": 89,
  "nextPage": 91,
  "slideType": "scenario_analysis",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 18,
  "notes": "Includes a waterfall chart for cost baseline and a scenario comparison table for recruitment, cost, and revenue.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "waterfall_chart",
    "bullet_list",
    "data_table",
    "comparison_table",
    "callout_box"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/90",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-90",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "10-25% potentiale igennem billigere opgaveløsning ved hjemtagning; stor skalerbarhed giver nedre grænse på ~1 mio. kr.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a677-7039-bfd6-89066437dda4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Driftsudgifter mio. kr. waterfall chart",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "waterfall",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b0cade59-11e8-49d7-9ce9-f3d94fa166b3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.55,
        "y": 0.3
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Udviklingsopgaven er karakteriseret ved enkeltstående opgaver... Nogle opgaver kræver specifikke kompetencer... Samlet set kræver de fleste typer af udviklingsopgaver generelt mere specialiserede kompetencer end drift og vedligeholdelse",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "66e2d394-fd2c-432f-a9bd-b8167d6a70f2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Potentiale (mio. kr.): 1-14",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a677-7039-bfd6-8c01e50d6835",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.93
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Note: Forskellen på ekstern konsulentbistand (~2 mio. kr.) og intern lønkvante (< 1 mio. kr.) lægger til grund for muligt provenu. Kilde: Underarbejdsgruppen",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ed170b48-670e-4199-b855-d84a3da11b49",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.65
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Udvikling—insourcing af 1–27 ÅV",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b8ac1359-a0d0-4906-b168-20e193dcf462",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.55,
        "y": 0.6
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Scenarier A, B, C comparison table",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "scenario",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7b7a18c5-eb4d-40a0-9d45-75ee268835f4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Scenarie 2: Hjemtagning af udvikling delt op i 3 scenarier",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9c79a651-4990-473a-865c-cab66f321861",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Potentiale (mio. kr.)",
      "numberRaw": "1-14",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": "Scenarie 2: Hjemtagning af udvikling delt op i 3 scenarier",
      "calloutText": "10-25% potentiale igennem billigere opgaveløsning ved hjemtagning; stor skalerbarhed giver nedre grænse på ~1 mio. kr.",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 1,
      "metricFamily": "cost_savings",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Scenario Analysis",
      "slug": "scenario-analysis",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "3aeb70fc-aca1-46c1-9bd8-e03dfb8d6c79",
      "evidence": "The slide presents a scenario analysis for Scenarie 2, including estimated provenu and different scenarios.",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "scenario_analysis",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "223a4416-e4ba-4004-a364-17c1e74f4946",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly structures the analysis into three scenarios (A, B, C) to evaluate outcomes.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 321,
      "from": 19,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    },
    {
      "to": 165,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 97,
      "from": 84,
      "name": "Scenario Fork",
      "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
      "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-52e9a3c46a82",
      "evidence": "Scenario 1 (drift+vedl, fravalgt) vs scenario 2 (udvikling, 3 sub-scenarios).",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Compare insourcing scenarios for IT development",
      "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
      "confidence": 88,
      "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}