{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664",
  "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 89,
  "pageCount": 482,
  "prevPage": 88,
  "nextPage": 90,
  "slideType": "scenario_analysis",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 10,
  "notes": "Waterfall chart shows the breakdown of costs from total DeMars budget to addressable drift savings.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "waterfall_chart",
    "callout_box",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/89",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-89",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Udgifter til udviklingskonsulenter lægges til det totale potentiale",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a677-7039-bfd6-696006bb4310",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.4,
        "y": 0.3
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Driftsudgifter mio. kr.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "waterfall",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1247f791-741c-4575-99e9-9e24498ffd4d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.3
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Drift og vedligeholdelsesopgaven er som udgangspunkt binær af karakter; Betydelige risici forbundet med driftsscenariet; Scenarie fravalgt pga. ingen skalerbarhed",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3bd42d3a-2414-4375-9865-13e41b12672b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "mio. kr.: 9-24",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a677-7039-bfd6-6ee99ad85d3d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Note: 10-25% potentiale er underarbejdsgruppens vurdering pba. tidligere analyser - bl.a. har rekrutteringsudfordringen haft indflydelse på et konservativt nedre spænd. Kilde: Underarbejdsgruppen",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ce9738f9-5721-4fc8-aa05-337661adfd83",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Scenarie 1: Provenu på insourcing af drift og vedligeholdelse estimeret til 9-24 mio. kr. – fravalgt pga. lille realiserbarhed",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0cab5c25-f00a-4829-bd4e-a73ecc41c42f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "mio. kr.",
      "numberRaw": "9-24",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": "Scenarie 1: Provenu på insourcing af drift og vedligeholdelse estimeret til 9-24 mio. kr. – fravalgt pga. lille realiserbarhed",
      "calloutText": "Udgifter til udviklingskonsulenter lægges til det totale potentiale",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 9,
      "metricFamily": "market_size",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Scenario Analysis",
      "slug": "scenario-analysis",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "bd62e7e7-c202-4515-9e0f-c72110bd9783",
      "evidence": "The slide presents a scenario analysis for Scenarie 1, including estimated provenu and reasons for not pursuing it.",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "waterfall-chart",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "d354d680-1b29-4b6b-8e76-cce448ef22c4",
      "evidence": "Waterfall chart used to decompose cost savings",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 321,
      "from": 19,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    },
    {
      "to": 165,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 97,
      "from": 84,
      "name": "Scenario Fork",
      "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
      "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-52e9a3c46a82",
      "evidence": "Scenario 1 (drift+vedl, fravalgt) vs scenario 2 (udvikling, 3 sub-scenarios).",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Compare insourcing scenarios for IT development",
      "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
      "confidence": 88,
      "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}