{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664",
  "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 88,
  "pageCount": 482,
  "prevPage": 87,
  "nextPage": 89,
  "slideType": "appendix_data",
  "function": "quantify_impact",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 8,
  "notes": "The waterfall chart shows the deduction of licenses and hardware costs and the addition of development consultant costs to reach the net addressable baseline.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "waterfall_chart",
    "callout_box",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/88",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-88",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Bruttobaseline på 201; adresserbar på 151 mio kr.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a677-7039-bfd6-d31462bf704d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.52,
        "y": 0.3
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Waterfall chart showing total DeMars baseline of 201 million DKK reduced to 151 million DKK addressable baseline.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "waterfall",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "bc786d3f-e99a-4bcf-afd9-d25a47468163",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Metoden tager udgangspunkt i tidligere rapporter samt opdateret analyse af rekrutteringsudfordringen; Metoden forudsætter As-is situation for SAP",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1e762978-a4cf-499e-a97d-307fc4c211fc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Addressable baseline: 151 mio kr.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a677-7039-bfd6-d7783cea3179",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.93
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "1. Analyse bygger på nuværende situation; en overgang til S4 HANA kunne ændre nogle af disse forudsætninger. Kilde: Underarbejdsgruppen",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5f321f5c-e5c7-43f0-b37a-8fdf0f822b8c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "DeMars udgifter brudt ned til adresserbar baseline",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b39b99a9-90fa-450e-9b21-7d302a659e3a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Addressable baseline",
      "numberRaw": "151 mio kr.",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": "DeMars udgifter brudt ned til adresserbar baseline",
      "calloutText": "Bruttobaseline på 201; adresserbar på 151 mio kr.",
      "numberScale": "m",
      "numberValue": 151,
      "metricFamily": "other",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Waterfall chart",
      "slug": "waterfall-chart",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "ee014f22-2187-4f05-9cdc-810aec483373",
      "evidence": "The slide contains a waterfall chart showing the DeMars baseline reduced to an addressable baseline.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "waterfall-chart",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "0c1525f9-58d8-4aab-839f-7c36b717628e",
      "evidence": "Waterfall chart used to decompose total costs into addressable baseline.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 321,
      "from": 19,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    },
    {
      "to": 165,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 97,
      "from": 84,
      "name": "Scenario Fork",
      "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
      "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-52e9a3c46a82",
      "evidence": "Scenario 1 (drift+vedl, fravalgt) vs scenario 2 (udvikling, 3 sub-scenarios).",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Compare insourcing scenarios for IT development",
      "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
      "confidence": 88,
      "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}