{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664",
  "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 86,
  "pageCount": 482,
  "prevPage": 85,
  "nextPage": 87,
  "slideType": "situation_overview",
  "function": "establish_context",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": "The slide contrasts 2016 findings with current recruitment challenges and updated cost assumptions.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "callout_box",
    "icon_grid"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/86",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-86",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.18,
        "y": 0.8
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Tidligere rapport anvendt til provenuskøn – men potentiale tilrettet på baggrund af følsomhedsanalyse og forudsætninger omkring rekrutteringsudfordringen",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "65387291-65d9-40ec-bfaf-78af6a5e9f77",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.23
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Tidligere rapporter og analyser: PA Consulting (50 mio. kr.), Deloitte (sensitivity analysis, risks: recruitment, SAP market, consultant dependency)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3ef4e894-a96b-48b2-aeb1-8db7e6f2f07f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.48,
        "x": 0.48,
        "y": 0.23
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Analysearbejde og forudsætninger i dag: Contract expiry Oct 2018, recruitment of 10 specialists, cost assumptions (750-950k/yr), consultant costs (~2m/yr), uncertainty in retention",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9944e4a7-e34d-4ef0-993f-d5f1e1b48ab6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Revenue gain: 50 mio. kr.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a677-7039-bfd6-527e99d1a08e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Kilde: Underarbejdsgruppen",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1bfa8276-67f6-4539-935b-f2be99142542",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Rapport i 2016 pegede på ~50 mio. kr. provenu ved samlet hjemtagning af DeMars",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c24da781-aef6-4cc8-a2f3-c85fd7f92c5d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Tidligere analyse benyttet til at identificere muligt provenu",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "059b0ca8-ecf9-4f84-934d-eaa7db3d778b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Revenue gain",
      "numberRaw": "50 mio. kr.",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": "Tidligere analyse benyttet til at identificere muligt provenu",
      "calloutText": "Tidligere rapport anvendt til provenuskøn – men potentiale tilrettet på baggrund af følsomhedsanalyse og forudsætninger omkring rekrutteringsudfordringen",
      "numberScale": "m",
      "numberValue": 50,
      "metricFamily": "revenue",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "situation_overview",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "0bad1f38-ecc0-4e46-8f41-20ff5eb06c73",
      "evidence": "The slide provides a historical context and current status update on a specific business case.",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 321,
      "from": 19,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    },
    {
      "to": 165,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 97,
      "from": 84,
      "name": "Scenario Fork",
      "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
      "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-52e9a3c46a82",
      "evidence": "Scenario 1 (drift+vedl, fravalgt) vs scenario 2 (udvikling, 3 sub-scenarios).",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Compare insourcing scenarios for IT development",
      "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
      "confidence": 88,
      "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}