{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664",
  "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 85,
  "pageCount": 482,
  "prevPage": 84,
  "nextPage": 86,
  "slideType": "roadmap",
  "function": "present_solution",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a three-column structure (A, B, C) to represent a process or logical flow of the proposal development.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "process_diagram",
    "screenshot",
    "bullet_list"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/85",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-85",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "For at styrke tidligere udarbejdet materiale for hjemtagning af DeMars er problemstillinger såsom rekrutteringsudfordringen blevet nærmere belyst",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a677-7039-bfd6-31057de0e738",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "diagram",
      "text": "A: Identifikation af potentiale, B: Opstilling af scenarier, C: Fokus på udvalgt scenarie",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "process",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "af7b9ed2-3aba-41dc-967f-302276a3679d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.65,
        "y": 0.55
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Hjemtagning af udviklingsopgaven som fokusområde: Hjemtagning af driften er ikke skalerbar og forbundet med betydelig risiko – og anses derfor som urealiserbart",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2b869601-e63c-47fc-960a-714d6cd9d7f5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.55
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Eksisterende analyser på området anvendt: Oprindelig rapport fra PA Consulting vedr. hjemtagning af DeMars; Efterfølgende følsomhedsanalyse fra Deloitte",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b7028f7f-6ef1-4f7f-97f7-82a79ec76205",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.35,
        "y": 0.55
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "DeMars baseline brudt ned til to overordnede dele: 1. DeMars drift og vedligeholdelse, 2. DeMars udvikling",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "numbered",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7d65ac96-cfca-4c06-9969-7897b7359bdc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "For at styrke tidligere udarbejdet materiale for hjemtagning af DeMars er problemstillinger såsom rekrutteringsudfordringen blevet nærmere belyst",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ee51a420-7731-4227-bb68-3263896046f9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Struktur for effektiviseringsforslaget sammensat af 3 dele",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a79d87e9-9ad1-462a-9dbb-368f060927ef",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "Process Flow",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "6846e56a-300c-4248-853d-f360d1c5c37c",
      "evidence": "Three-part sequential structure (A, B, C)",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 321,
      "from": 19,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    },
    {
      "to": 165,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 97,
      "from": 84,
      "name": "Scenario Fork",
      "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
      "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-52e9a3c46a82",
      "evidence": "Scenario 1 (drift+vedl, fravalgt) vs scenario 2 (udvikling, 3 sub-scenarios).",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Compare insourcing scenarios for IT development",
      "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
      "confidence": 88,
      "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}