{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664",
  "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 355,
  "pageCount": 482,
  "prevPage": 354,
  "nextPage": 356,
  "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
  "function": "present_framework",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 4,
  "notes": "The slide uses a triangulation methodology to validate the baseline data.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "other"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/355",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-355",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Triangulering af baseline styrker analysens validitet",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a678-74db-8183-24bddcfa1810",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.94,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.27
      },
      "kind": "framework",
      "text": "Triangulation of data sources",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "instance",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5b75bc1d-7b36-4cfa-8cfd-ac88ee301c69",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.37,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Analyse af anden administration fra 2016",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "07a26785-125c-4b1f-bfd0-2f71aa857184",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Spørgeskema i VFK med opfølgende interviewrunde",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8f273df5-9b98-4182-916f-ebe73363010b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.69,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Analyse af stillingsfunktionsbeskrivelser",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "dd8e03ab-eeb2-40b5-bb78-88d57b125f61",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.36
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Details of the three methodologies including survey data (2000+ respondents, 17 interviews), 2016 analysis (68 AV), and job description cross-referencing.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "55a3fb31-befa-4fe7-b252-14edd86fd94d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Triangulering af baseline styrker analysens validitet",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "790a8e1f-c241-44f6-8e97-bb396a6879e8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "En række komplementerende tilgange validerer analysen",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "dd0228f9-e844-4f7d-abcf-891b108db79b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "triangulation",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "29e34f6f-9eff-4dee-b55c-9a62b200d4a5",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly mentions 'Triangulering af baseline' and uses three distinct data sources to validate the analysis.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 420,
      "from": 322,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 365,
      "from": 166,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 365,
      "from": 322,
      "name": "Scenario Fork",
      "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
      "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6e9175aa6c84",
      "evidence": "5 designkriterier -> 4 konkrete modeller (page 334-336) -> recommendation + 14 mio. kr. kursusadm.",
      "position": 11,
      "objective": "Compare four models for administrative faellesskaber plus kursusadministration",
      "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
      "confidence": 86,
      "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}