{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664",
  "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 332,
  "pageCount": 482,
  "prevPage": 331,
  "nextPage": 333,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-like structure to compare organizational models.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "action_title",
    "paragraph",
    "comparison_table",
    "callout_box"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/332",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-332",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.82
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Det generelle behov for ensretning af arbejdsopgaver og serviceniveau, samt muligheden for langsigtet procesoptimering på tværs af både enheder og værn, medfører at en samling af ansvaret på ét niveau vurderes hensigtsmæssigt.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "349ff022-5e3e-442b-835c-2696d68472c4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Med organisatorisk forankring refereres til det ledelsesmæssige ansvar, dvs. hvor den styringsmæssige prioritering foretages. Konsolidering af det ledelsesmæssige ansvar på et højere niveau sikrer en mere tværgående og ensartet prioritering...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e068f5ae-9d7f-4b43-a6c8-90a7cc454b0e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.52,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison matrix of organizational levels I-IV with columns for 'Fordele' (Pros) and 'Begrænsninger' (Cons).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "091a7a4c-5ce9-4f67-9c61-2d8354d47cd6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Det vurderes hensigtsmæssigt at forankre det organisatoriske ansvar på styrelsesniveau",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e3bf83be-dc51-4b2f-b5a6-f3b28cea9f9b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_table",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "5e4b5ea0-af7d-4dc8-b50c-bec485dda9b3",
      "evidence": "The slide presents a structured comparison of four organizational models across pros and cons.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 420,
      "from": 322,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 365,
      "from": 166,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 365,
      "from": 322,
      "name": "Scenario Fork",
      "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
      "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6e9175aa6c84",
      "evidence": "5 designkriterier -> 4 konkrete modeller (page 334-336) -> recommendation + 14 mio. kr. kursusadm.",
      "position": 11,
      "objective": "Compare four models for administrative faellesskaber plus kursusadministration",
      "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
      "confidence": 86,
      "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}