{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664",
  "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 330,
  "pageCount": 482,
  "prevPage": 329,
  "nextPage": 331,
  "slideType": "other",
  "function": "present_framework",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide presents a custom framework for evaluating administrative solution models.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "comparison_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/330",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-330",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.75,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.00115
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Table with columns: Designkriterier, Uddybning, Betydning for løsning. Rows: Volumen, Nærhed til forretning, Den operative opgaveløsning, Realiserbarhed, Forankring med beslægtede opgaver.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "40e1df0b-928f-4cdc-be6d-5f723e682e2e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Løsningsmodellerne er baseret på fem designkriterier",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a59b6c89-a7b1-45df-ad64-65131f07ccf5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Issue Tree",
      "slug": "issue-tree",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "block",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-12a5-7665-b701-312c11e01e0c",
      "evidence": "Five-criterion design framework structured.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "7bc5d6aa-1049-48f2-94d3-fd5935384c80",
      "evidence": "The slide presents a table with design criteria, but it's not a traditional 2x2 matrix.",
      "confidence": 0.6
    },
    {
      "name": "Visual Hierarchy",
      "slug": "visual-hierarchy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-12a5-7665-b701-2c7a9dcfd690",
      "evidence": "Five designkriterier x uddybning x betydning columns.",
      "confidence": 78
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "Design Criteria Framework",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "2f9e9d69-e94b-4024-8361-e0489d7381b3",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly defines five criteria used to evaluate solution models.",
      "confidence": 0.8
    },
    {
      "name": "Five Design Criteria (Custom)",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1ca6-71be-9e56-dc49aea1d55f",
      "evidence": "Five labelled designkriterier framework on Y-axis.",
      "confidence": 78
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 420,
      "from": 322,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 365,
      "from": 166,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 365,
      "from": 322,
      "name": "Scenario Fork",
      "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
      "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6e9175aa6c84",
      "evidence": "5 designkriterier -> 4 konkrete modeller (page 334-336) -> recommendation + 14 mio. kr. kursusadm.",
      "position": 11,
      "objective": "Compare four models for administrative faellesskaber plus kursusadministration",
      "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
      "confidence": 86,
      "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}