{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664",
  "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 13,
  "pageCount": 482,
  "prevPage": 12,
  "nextPage": 14,
  "slideType": "client_example",
  "function": "illustrate_case",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list format to detail three specific procurement projects (trucks, CWI radars, and terminal maneuvering area radars).",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "numbered_list",
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/13",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-13",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Som led i analysearbejdet er indsamlet en række \"best practice\"-cases, der eksemplificerer tilfælde, hvor samarbejdet mellem den operative struktur og anskaffende myndighed har fungeret positivt og har ledt til bedre, priseffektive anskaffelser.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a676-734b-b51d-d8eac35be3b0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "1. Projekt lastvogn, vej\n2. CWI-radarer (erstatningsanskaffelse)\n3. Anskaffelse af 3 stk. Terminal Manoeuvring Area-radarer",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "numbered",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f4f515a2-14ea-48e7-83ec-b45f38da40a5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "cost savings: 55%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a676-734b-b51d-df4a04790586",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Som led i analysearbejdet er indsamlet en række \"best practice\"-cases, der eksemplificerer tilfælde, hvor samarbejdet mellem den operative struktur og anskaffende myndighed har fungeret positivt og har ledt til bedre, priseffektive anskaffelser. De indsamlede cases er brugt til at identificere løftestænger for nye anskaffelser og udvikle forslag til bedre samarbejdsformer. Tre af de indsamlede cases er gengivet herunder",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3d7d45c4-3c61-4356-bbf2-a7258fbab6ed",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Kilde: Underarbejdsgruppen for effektiviseringsforslaget",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "03d2034a-2caa-4e59-9b85-045740c1ebf9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Tre eksempler på \"best practice\" fra tidligere anskaffelser",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "723b87c4-6ccb-43a5-b269-596f1fa5e00b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "cost savings",
      "numberRaw": "55%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": null,
      "calloutText": "Som led i analysearbejdet er indsamlet en række \"best practice\"-cases, der eksemplificerer tilfælde, hvor samarbejdet mellem den operative struktur og anskaffende myndighed har fungeret positivt og har ledt til bedre, priseffektive anskaffelser.",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 55,
      "metricFamily": "cost_savings",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "List presentation",
      "slug": "list-presentation",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "affe707b-c308-4b59-bc24-d43184aed5b1",
      "evidence": "1. Projekt lastvogn, vej, 2. CWI-radarer (erstatningsanskaffelse), 3. Anskaffelse af 3 stk. Terminal Manoeuvring Area-radarer list/numbered",
      "confidence": 0.6
    },
    {
      "name": "Sinatra Test",
      "slug": "sinatra-test",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-12a5-7665-b700-967e2074e8de",
      "evidence": "Three best-practice cases used as 'if it worked here, it works' anchor.",
      "confidence": 70
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 18,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-200ed114be36",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "First proposal's problem statement: 'manglende koordination mellem FMI og brugere'.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    },
    {
      "to": 165,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 27,
      "from": 9,
      "name": "So What Cascade",
      "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
      "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-45efc998ae59",
      "evidence": "Problem statement -> segmentation -> diagnosis -> IPT recommendation -> 45 mio. kr. potentiale -> implementation plan.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Frame procurement-coordination problem and recommend Integrated Project Teams",
      "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
      "confidence": 85,
      "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}