{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
  "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
  "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 31,
  "pageCount": 190,
  "prevPage": 30,
  "nextPage": 32,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 25,
  "notes": "The table includes a column for 'Realisérbarhed' represented by pie-chart icons indicating feasibility levels.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "data_table",
    "icon_grid"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/31",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-31",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Nettopotentiale (mio. kr.)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-b487-77e8-8c37-310e251c4c67",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.4,
        "w": 0.02,
        "x": 0.97,
        "y": 0.5
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Copyright © 2016 by The Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8992c597-0929-4d68-8455-500edb65f12c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.75,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.165
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Table containing themes, proposal IDs, descriptions, annual net potential (2018-2022), risks, and feasibility icons.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b5c8a2be-16f6-43a0-a260-a20ecd0c994d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Det operative område: Oversigt over effektiviseringsforslag (III/VI)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "465ef30d-e0a5-47c8-b88e-2809b7bbf571",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Table data",
      "slug": "table-data",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "c629e3d9-7140-43dc-b61d-9fe8f5b9b7a3",
      "evidence": "Table containing themes, proposal IDs, descriptions, annual net potential (2018-2022), risks, and feasibility icons.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 115,
      "from": 24,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 95,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 138,
      "from": 24,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
      "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 34,
      "from": 29,
      "name": "Pareto Focus",
      "slug": "50-pareto-focus",
      "bestFor": "Resource allocation, problem prioritization, efficiency improvements",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-fcfc5956c12c",
      "evidence": "Six-page (I-VI) list of proposals with provenue figures showing where the largest savings sit.",
      "position": 7,
      "objective": "Catalogue all operative-area efficiency proposals with size",
      "structure": "The Full Distribution -> The Vital Few (20%) -> The Trivial Many (80%) -> Focus Recommendation",
      "confidence": 75,
      "description": "Show that 80% of results come from 20% of causes to drive prioritization"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}