{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
  "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
  "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 29,
  "pageCount": 190,
  "prevPage": 28,
  "nextPage": 30,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 20,
  "notes": "The table uses a 'Struktur og koncept er' label spanning rows 1-4. Some data points are redacted with black bars.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "data_table",
    "icon_grid"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/29",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-29",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Nettopotentiale (mio. kr.)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-b487-77e8-8c36-4ddccdeb7dcb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Table containing columns: Tema, #, Effektiviseringsforslag, Nettopotentiale (2018-2022), Væsentligste konsekvenser og risici, Realiserbarhed.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "173d2d81-1b57-478d-a893-0c19e352a25a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Det operative område: Oversigt over effektiviseringsforslag (I/VI)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9464fbae-cdec-4fcf-ae60-8eddc243c9d6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Chunking",
      "slug": "chunking",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "loop",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-12a5-7665-b6ff-cf9c3cc47542",
      "evidence": "Six-page split (I-VI) makes 45 proposals digestible.",
      "confidence": 75
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 115,
      "from": 24,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 95,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 138,
      "from": 24,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
      "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 34,
      "from": 29,
      "name": "Pareto Focus",
      "slug": "50-pareto-focus",
      "bestFor": "Resource allocation, problem prioritization, efficiency improvements",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-fcfc5956c12c",
      "evidence": "Six-page (I-VI) list of proposals with provenue figures showing where the largest savings sit.",
      "position": 7,
      "objective": "Catalogue all operative-area efficiency proposals with size",
      "structure": "The Full Distribution -> The Vital Few (20%) -> The Trivial Many (80%) -> Focus Recommendation",
      "confidence": 75,
      "description": "Show that 80% of results come from 20% of causes to drive prioritization"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}