{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
  "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
  "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 168,
  "pageCount": 190,
  "prevPage": 167,
  "nextPage": 169,
  "slideType": "financial_analysis",
  "function": "quantify_impact",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 42,
  "notes": "The slide illustrates the 'lag' between cost reduction and cash/expenditure impact.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "bar_chart_stacked",
    "callout_box"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/168",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-168",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Lavere afskrivninger slår pr. definition ikke igennem på udgiftssiden",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-b487-77e8-8c44-186ddf8a1b4c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.35,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Stacked bar chart showing expenditure impact over time (1 year to >5 years)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8faad560-751e-4bb4-bc8e-7e6514ad920e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Waterfall chart showing cost reduction from 727 to 327",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "waterfall",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7ba917d6-e58e-45a7-8791-20539df7d212",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.35,
        "y": 0.75
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Lavere afskrivninger slår pr. definition ikke igennem på udgiftssiden\nFor vedligehold samt lager og logistik skyldes udgiftsprofilen dels, at nogle omkostningsreduktioner slår forsinket igennem, dels at andre slet ikke har gennemslag på udgiftssiden\nFor de operative omkostninger skyldes forsinkelserne i udgiftsgennemslaget især andelen af tjenestemandskontrakter med treårig udfasning",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "88cb0f15-0783-4aba-8536-2f88b2e080af",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.13
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Udgiftsgennemslaget er ikke 1:1 lig med ændringen i omkostninger for alle omkostningstyper\nVisse omkostninger realiseres ikke, som eksempelvis afskrivninger, mens andre blot forsinkes grundet fx kontrakter til tjenestemandsansatte eller forskellige lagerbindinger",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "be549d45-48ce-4d41-8761-c1fee80762a8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Cost realization percentage: 61%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-b487-77e8-8c44-1d85eadbc505",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Eksempel på tidsperspektiv for udgiftsgennemslag af skaleringer (EH101)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "dcf14a14-e3f3-44d1-b9d1-edf3f6ad6cce",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Cost realization percentage",
      "numberRaw": "61%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "Eksempel på tidsperspektiv for udgiftsgennemslag af skaleringer (EH101)",
      "calloutText": "Lavere afskrivninger slår pr. definition ikke igennem på udgiftssiden",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 61,
      "metricFamily": "cost_savings",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Waterfall chart",
      "slug": "waterfall-chart",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "4c78fd3c-545d-4a3a-86d3-332aa2471485",
      "evidence": "Waterfall chart showing cost reduction from 727 to 327",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 183,
      "from": 164,
      "name": "Scenario Fork",
      "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
      "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-40d41af340bf",
      "evidence": "20 small-multiples 'Skaleringsoversigt' pages showing 5-7 scenarios per capacity (Thetis, EH101, IKK, Leopard, Absalon, etc.).",
      "position": 24,
      "objective": "Show up/down scenarios for each of the 15 operative capacities",
      "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
      "confidence": 90,
      "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}