{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
  "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
  "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 144,
  "pageCount": 190,
  "prevPage": 143,
  "nextPage": 145,
  "slideType": "appendix_data",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide lists two specific areas where efficiency proposals were considered but ultimately discarded.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "comparison_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/144",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-144",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.91,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.188
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Område, Tema, Effektiviseringsforslag, Begrundelse. Rows: Det understøtten de materiel- og IT-område | Øvrige | Reduktion af bevilling til internationale forskningssamarbejder | Effektiviseringsforslag udgået på baggrund af direktiv fra Styregruppeformand. Tværgående driftsydelser og administrative processer | Ikke-militære varegrupper | Forplejning mv. | Langt størstedelen af udgifterne på området er operativt betinget, bl.a. til INTOPS og NATOPS. De resterede udgifter er allerede analyseret i anden sammenhæng og blev ikke vurderet at kunne påvirkes, fx tilskud til kaffe og kage samt kantinetilskud.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "80eb3ce3-02de-4a4e-8ea2-6fbc09e43b19",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.085
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Udgåede effektiviseringsforslag (V/V)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c5c0a462-bd0c-4aa5-9924-9c2bee2b18e0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 144,
      "from": 140,
      "name": "Elimination",
      "slug": "07-elimination",
      "bestFor": "Decision justification, recommendation defense, skeptical stakeholders",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-37262b5ac5e5",
      "evidence": "Five-part 'Udgåede effektiviseringsforslag' list explaining why 28 proposals were closed.",
      "position": 21,
      "objective": "Justify which proposals were dropped and why",
      "structure": "The Options -> Why Not A -> Why Not B -> Why C is the Answer",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Systematically rule out alternatives to arrive at the only viable conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}