{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
  "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
  "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 143,
  "pageCount": 190,
  "prevPage": 142,
  "nextPage": 144,
  "slideType": "appendix_data",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 1,
  "notes": "The slide lists specific organizational proposals (e.g., Frederiksberg Slot, Army training consolidation, Arctic Command) and explains why they were dropped (usually because they were already covered by other reorganization plans or deemed unfeasible).",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "data_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/143",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-143",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.185
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Område, Tema, Effektiviseringsforslag, Begrundelse. Det operative område, struktur og koncepter, [List of proposals and reasons]",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "297c666e-8785-4d12-9cfc-f46b3cc73fb2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Udgåede effektiviseringsforslag (IV/V)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c7b1dcfb-b295-4324-b24f-e55f1b291847",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 144,
      "from": 140,
      "name": "Elimination",
      "slug": "07-elimination",
      "bestFor": "Decision justification, recommendation defense, skeptical stakeholders",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-37262b5ac5e5",
      "evidence": "Five-part 'Udgåede effektiviseringsforslag' list explaining why 28 proposals were closed.",
      "position": 21,
      "objective": "Justify which proposals were dropped and why",
      "structure": "The Options -> Why Not A -> Why Not B -> Why C is the Answer",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Systematically rule out alternatives to arrive at the only viable conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}