{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
  "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
  "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 140,
  "pageCount": 190,
  "prevPage": 139,
  "nextPage": 141,
  "slideType": "appendix_data",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide lists specific operational efficiency proposals that were deemed unfeasible due to lack of revenue, time constraints, or mutual exclusivity.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "comparison_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/140",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-140",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Der blev i løbet af budgetanalysen analyseret en række effektiviseringsforslag, som af forskellige årsager blev nedlukket. Årsagerne til nedlukningen af effektiviseringsforslagene spænder bredt fra manglende provenu, tidsmæssige begrænsninger ift. budgetanalysen samt gensidigt udelukkende forslag. Beslutninger om nedlukning af effektiviseringsforslagene blev taget af de relevante styregrupper efter delegering af kompetence hertil af programstyregruppen.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "38a8faf7-d53b-4ea6-8a62-124b57ff5827",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.32
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Table containing columns: Område, Tema, Effektiviseringsforslag, Begrundelse",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5bbd2000-799e-4c03-acde-41e18e8b8449",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Udgåede effektiviseringsforslag (I/V)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2bf8fc99-a480-4f37-b0b6-e9a3d8d2e5ae",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 144,
      "from": 140,
      "name": "Elimination",
      "slug": "07-elimination",
      "bestFor": "Decision justification, recommendation defense, skeptical stakeholders",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-37262b5ac5e5",
      "evidence": "Five-part 'Udgåede effektiviseringsforslag' list explaining why 28 proposals were closed.",
      "position": 21,
      "objective": "Justify which proposals were dropped and why",
      "structure": "The Options -> Why Not A -> Why Not B -> Why C is the Answer",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Systematically rule out alternatives to arrive at the only viable conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}