{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
  "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
  "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 108,
  "pageCount": 190,
  "prevPage": 107,
  "nextPage": 109,
  "slideType": "appendix_data",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 25,
  "notes": "The table shows specific overlaps between efficiency initiatives, noting that some have zero impact while others show negative values (savings/reductions).",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "comparison_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/108",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-108",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.33,
        "x": 0.33,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "The Boston Consulting Group & Struensee & Co.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "logo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5068ee32-0741-4a1b-9296-4cd90eda16ec",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Mio. kr.: -2",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-b487-77e8-8c3e-13dbf08d2db8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Følgende sider forklarer overlappene imellem effektiviseringsforslagene, herunder begrundelsen for overlappet, metoden for udregningen af overlappet, de berørte myndigheder samt opgørelse af hvert overlap per år for hhv. lavt og højt spænd",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e59b8454-48a0-44bb-8cfa-e30049912c29",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.24
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Table containing columns: Overlap fra, Overlap til, Begrundelse, Metode for beregning, Berørte myndigheder, Mio. kr. (2018-2022)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "87c31c24-2da9-41c8-8fb2-ced85716e91e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Beskrivelse af overlap imellem effektiviseringsforslagene i budgetanalysen (2/8)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "78084791-181c-4ddd-8b24-aaa3d0b37463",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Mio. kr.",
      "numberRaw": "-2",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": null,
      "calloutText": null,
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": -2,
      "metricFamily": "market_size",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 115,
      "from": 24,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 95,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 138,
      "from": 24,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
      "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 115,
      "from": 106,
      "name": "Sensitivity Test",
      "slug": "52-sensitivity-test",
      "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-2974563388cb",
      "evidence": "Eight-page 'Beskrivelse af overlap' section quantifying overlap (-22, -49, -3) and overhead-rate sensitivity.",
      "position": 18,
      "objective": "Stress-test gross savings for inter-initiative overlap",
      "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion",
      "confidence": 85,
      "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}