{ "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1", "docSlug": "b89c4b2a8f5b0c45", "documentTitle": "Transformation Ebook", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 2.5, "pageNumber": 94, "pageCount": 167, "prevPage": 93, "nextPage": 95, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "diagnose", "density": "dense", "nDataPoints": 0, "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list format to structure a diagnostic framework for roadmap validation.", "elementsJson": [ "headline_text", "paragraph", "callout_box", "numbered_list", "footnote" ], "metadataConfidence": 1, "imagePath": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1/94", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1", "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1.json", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1#slide-94", "components": [ { "bbox": { "h": 0.06, "w": 0.72, "x": 0.14, "y": 0.33 }, "kind": "callout", "text": "Rigor Testing Helps Gauge the Robustness and Consistency of Roadmaps Prior to Launch", "attrs": null, "subkind": "primary", "toolName": null, "toolSlug": null, "confidence": null, "componentId": "ab1e37d2-27ea-42ee-850d-d2a396e25bc8", "frameworkName": null, "frameworkSlug": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.45, "w": 0.72, "x": 0.14, "y": 0.42 }, "kind": "list", "text": "1. Is ownership and accountability for the roadmap clearly established? Does the ownership structure tie logically to the content of the roadmap? 2. Is the roadmap logically disaggregated into regular milestones that are sufficient for review of main actions and progress against plan? 3. Are the milestones tangible enough to describe how the roadmap will really be achieved? 4. Is the timing and sequencing of milestones logical? 5. Do milestones incorporate an executable change plan, including communication, training, and stakeholder engagement? 6. Do those executing the initiative feel that they \"want to\" rather than \"have to\" be involved? 7. Are the overall impacts disaggregated into financial and operational impacts and quantified along the timeline (for example, recurring cost reductions and downtime reductions)? 8. Do the operational KPIs act sufficiently as lead indicators of subsequent financial-impact delivery? Do they test appropriately for any critical business-case assumptions (for example, cost, yield, or market assumptions)? 9. Has the finance department identified all potential recurring and one-time cost implications and confirmed that they are measurable? 10. Is the timing of impacts (benefits and costs) consistent with the timing of the milestones with which they are associated? 11. Is revenue uplift thought through in a practical and measurable way? 12. Would someone from another part of the organization be able to read the roadmap and understand what to do and what is at risk? 13. Are key issues, risks, and interdependencies adequately exposed and addressed in the qualitative roadmap description? 14. Who are the key stakeholders for the initiative? Have their concerns and needs been factored in effectively? 15. Have key issues, risks, and interdependencies been made explicit in milestone descriptions? Have specific milestones been developed to trigger conversations that assess confidence in delivering against key issues, risks, and interdependencies? 16. Does a DICE assessment predict a favorable outcome for the roadmap?", "attrs": null, "subkind": "numbered", "toolName": null, "toolSlug": null, "confidence": null, "componentId": "19010ec5-d55e-4e07-9574-24c529bcc76f", "frameworkName": null, "frameworkSlug": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.15, "w": 0.72, "x": 0.14, "y": 0.16 }, "kind": "paragraph", "text": "able milestones and objectives to measure progress. The test, which typically takes up to one hour, exposes the roadmap to much higher levels of upfront discussion and scrutiny, making sure that the milestones are clear, there is consensus about the impacts, and the assumptions driving intended impacts are articulated and validated. It also helps to ensure that the risk points are well understood, the", "attrs": null, "subkind": "paragraph", "toolName": null, "toolSlug": null, "confidence": null, "componentId": "4e7a0b4c-908e-453f-9a8d-521329ebc5ff", "frameworkName": null, "frameworkSlug": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.06, "w": 0.72, "x": 0.14, "y": 0.87 }, "kind": "source-note", "text": "Source: BCG industry experience. Note: BCG's assessment of a change program's likelihood of success tracks the duration of the project, the capability of each initiative team, the overall leadership and local commitment to change, and the additional effort required of staff.", "attrs": null, "subkind": null, "toolName": null, "toolSlug": null, "confidence": null, "componentId": "db9171b9-b04e-4922-9ad4-6033f2499dce", "frameworkName": null, "frameworkSlug": null }, { "bbox": { "h": 0.04, "w": 0.5, "x": 0.14, "y": 0.11 }, "kind": "title", "text": "WHY IT'S SMART TO RIGOR TEST (CONTINUED)", "attrs": null, "subkind": "headline", "toolName": null, "toolSlug": null, "confidence": null, "componentId": "2b54923c-1e2a-434d-aa56-a902a07f17d7", "frameworkName": null, "frameworkSlug": null } ], "metrics": [], "tools": [ { "name": "List presentation", "slug": "list-presentation", "agent": null, "layer": "slide", "matchId": "ac05ef68-0123-4070-9366-15376bc9372b", "evidence": "1. Is ownership and accountability for the roadmap clearly established? Does the ownership structure tie logically to the content of the roadmap?", "confidence": 0.7 } ], "frameworks": [ { "name": "DICE assessment", "slug": null, "matchId": "b4807fc9-66b1-4cae-8df8-0fa5d012d771", "evidence": "Mentioned in point 16 and the source note.", "confidence": 1 } ], "arcBeats": [ { "to": 120, "from": 68, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-a46981f3662e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Part II execution chapters densely loaded with named-company case studies.", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 120, "from": 69, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-b3d6e5d451ad", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Part II - leading, managing, building capabilities.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "loops": [ { "to": 103, "from": 87, "name": "Domino Effect", "slug": "13-domino-effect", "bestFor": "Strategy roadmaps, showing ROI of a specific feature, causal analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-d40023ea6b84", "evidence": "Chapter introduces Change Delta with 4 interlocking elements (executional certainty -> leaders -> engagement -> governance).", "position": 8, "objective": "Show how Change Delta elements compound into sustainable change", "structure": "The Trigger Action -> First Reaction -> Second Reaction -> Final Impact", "confidence": 80, "description": "Demonstrate how a single small strategic move triggers a cascade of positive outcomes" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }