{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
  "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
  "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.773,
  "pageNumber": 22,
  "pageCount": 406,
  "prevPage": 21,
  "nextPage": 23,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The chart uses a dashed line to indicate the mean spending of peer cities (excluding Dallas).",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "callout_box",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/22",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-22",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.5,
        "y": 0.34
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "DAS FY15-16 budget ~10% below that of peers today, was 24% lower in FY13-14, and tentatively expected to be above average next fiscal year",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "07af7f55-d2c8-4e47-a379-e9cae8ad60ed",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.14,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Municipal Animal Services Budget ($/person)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "addc7805-78cb-4bda-8494-e43092fd6072",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Municipal Animal Services Budget ($/person): 8.89",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-b487-77e8-8c46-3d5f84ec8f6a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.89
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Note: Mean excludes Dallas, Source: Interviews with management from Los Angeles Animal Services, Washoe County Animal Services, County of San Diego Animal Services, San Antonio Animal Care Services, Fulton County Animal Services Austin Animal Services, Dallas Animal Services FY 2015 General Fund Budget, Jacksonville Animal Care and Protective Services, and Clark County Animal Control.), Lifeline Animal Project 990 Tax Form (2014), Miami-Dade Animal Services Projected Budget (2015), US Census Bureau 2013 Population Estimate and BCG analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5a83cb78-6dea-4aa0-843a-404383f0f96f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Historically DAS has been under funded relative to peer cities, but gap has been closed with proposed budget",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1ee80e62-cd80-460a-afbe-ac4586634926",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Municipal Animal Services Budget ($/person)",
      "numberRaw": "8.89",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": "Historically DAS has been under funded relative to peer cities, but gap has been closed with proposed budget",
      "calloutText": "DAS FY15-16 budget ~10% below that of peers today, was 24% lower in FY13-14, and tentatively expected to be above average next fiscal year",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 8.89,
      "metricFamily": "market_size",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-13ee-7068-9791-34222adc8787",
      "evidence": "'Historically DAS has been under funded relative to peer cities'",
      "confidence": 88
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "0300391c-d055-4601-86a8-6d6f17ddf841",
      "evidence": "Comparing Dallas animal services budget against peer cities to establish relative funding status.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 24,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-95142a9312b8",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "Executive findings on pop growth, bites, flat intake, transfer gap, budget, org issues",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 23,
      "from": 22,
      "name": "Benchmark Gap",
      "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
      "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-27a466b3d6c3",
      "evidence": "'~10% below peers'; 'Reaching average would require $8M/yr in funding'",
      "position": 5,
      "objective": "Show DAS budget gap vs peers and 501(c)3 cities",
      "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
      "confidence": 85,
      "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}