{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
  "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
  "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.773,
  "pageNumber": 131,
  "pageCount": 406,
  "prevPage": 130,
  "nextPage": 132,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide evaluates four models: Subdivision within a department, Independent department, Partially privatized, and Completely privatized.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "comparison_table",
    "paragraph",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/131",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-131",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "While a recommendation for \"complete privatization\" would have provided an organization with the greatest freedom to hire, communicate, and operate, there were three key risks that prevented us from recommending this organizational and governance structure.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-b488-7644-a961-e9b0abc47491",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.76,
        "x": 0.12,
        "y": 0.71
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Risks of complete privatization: loss of control, lack of qualified nonprofit partners, and high transition effort.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "00a4c824-f263-4901-97fc-dfeee26591e7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.76,
        "x": 0.12,
        "y": 0.62
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "While a recommendation for \"complete privatization\" would have provided an organization with the greatest freedom to hire, communicate, and operate, there were three key risks that prevented us from recommending this organizational and governance structure:",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3dbe5bd6-a1a0-4ce3-b775-7ebac84c0068",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.12,
        "y": 0.55
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Note: Typically, cities/counties will only privatize their animal shelter operations and operate field collection themselves. See compendium for more detailed assumptions. Source: BCG analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f2057dc8-a7ad-4fe8-87e2-62a921caf0f9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.76,
        "x": 0.12,
        "y": 0.27
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison matrix of governance structures across Resources, Communication, and Execution.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "31a0e3d1-27d5-49a0-b466-8db57d5365e1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Exhibit 31 | Pros & cons of various governance structures",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "45512f0a-f38f-441a-842c-c59b0adcaf5a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-13ee-7068-9792-4765bce71cdb",
      "evidence": "'Pros & cons of various governance structures'",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Comparison frame",
      "slug": "comparison-frame",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "332e63c5-7fc7-4a26-b516-eeb3288b4a43",
      "evidence": "While a recommendation for 'complete privatization' would have provided an organization with the greatest freedom to hire, communicate, and operate, there were three key risks that prevented us from recommending this approach.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    {
      "name": "Visual Hierarchy",
      "slug": "visual-hierarchy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-13ee-7068-9792-4a0110dd03ba",
      "evidence": "Comparison table layout",
      "confidence": 80
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "governance",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "47436e9b-5522-4d9b-a2a1-a2db0b4896db",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly compares different governance structures for public services.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 142,
      "from": 45,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-9f808a4e90ee",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Deep-dive recommendations, full report exhibits, peer benchmarks, S/N math",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 142,
      "from": 97,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-56b00e0e002c",
      "evidence": "Full report Rec 1 mission → Rec 7 efficiency, each with sub-initiatives",
      "position": 17,
      "objective": "Detailed exposition of all 7 recommendations and supporting initiatives",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 85,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}