{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
  "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
  "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.773,
  "pageNumber": 130,
  "pageCount": 406,
  "prevPage": 129,
  "nextPage": 131,
  "slideType": "diagnosis",
  "function": "diagnose",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a simple table-like structure to map three criteria against the current organizational model.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table",
    "bullet_list",
    "paragraph",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/130",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-130",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.76,
        "x": 0.12,
        "y": 0.61
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Subdivision within a department (status quo), Independent department, Partially privatized, Completely privatized",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "73a38e07-b7f2-41ff-92f2-ac5b5aa93690",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.12,
        "y": 0.6
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "In response to these issues, BCG evaluated four organizational models:",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5c35b13c-f753-411f-a19f-8cd6d93feb93",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.76,
        "x": 0.12,
        "y": 0.81
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "We assessed these models against the same three criteria: Resources and Talent, Communication & Coordination, and Execution & Accountability, and identified a mix of",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e2f0d9a1-8c8b-4f03-97d6-f2d4901c2963",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.27
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Resources and Talent, Communication and Coordination, Execution and Accountability",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "890da07e-841f-4dda-8aaf-873c76400284",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Exhibit 30I Pros & cons of existing DAS organization structure",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cbf5d32e-ab0b-4e99-8922-cc86b6f9d1cb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Evidence Matrix",
      "slug": "evidence-matrix",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "f01e2a44-c0b5-40cf-b783-9d5a888efee4",
      "evidence": "We assessed these models against the same three criteria: Resources and Talent, Communication & Coordination, and Execution & Accountability, and identified a mix of strengths and weaknesses for each.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "diagnostic-test",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "44a6a62f-ffdf-4319-a6ca-0ab01f7eb174",
      "evidence": "The slide evaluates the current state against specific criteria to identify organizational issues.",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 142,
      "from": 45,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-9f808a4e90ee",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Deep-dive recommendations, full report exhibits, peer benchmarks, S/N math",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 142,
      "from": 97,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-56b00e0e002c",
      "evidence": "Full report Rec 1 mission → Rec 7 efficiency, each with sub-initiatives",
      "position": 17,
      "objective": "Detailed exposition of all 7 recommendations and supporting initiatives",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 85,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}