{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-c8c7c89d1e97",
  "docSlug": "1b64d126e472d1d4",
  "documentTitle": "Media Entertainment Industry NYC",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.294,
  "pageNumber": 19,
  "pageCount": 49,
  "prevPage": 18,
  "nextPage": 20,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 14,
  "notes": "The chart shows a clear shift in capital allocation toward the $150M+ budget segment.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_grouped",
    "data_table",
    "bullet_list"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-c8c7c89d1e97/19",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-c8c7c89d1e97",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-c8c7c89d1e97.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-c8c7c89d1e97#slide-19",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "7X growth in dollars spent on $150M+ budget movies in 2011-2014 vs. in 2001-2004",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-acb5-76f0-a0a5-007ad96680d4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Total budget ($B) spent on top 100 grossing movies per year, 2001-2004 vs. 2011-2014, split by budget size",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b01bb68d-8ab0-4d82-891f-127bf1694bf7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.62,
        "y": 0.78
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Industry shifting away from midsize movies; Typically romantic comedies, dramas",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "91309f9b-56e7-4804-a101-a6054a04a975",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.62,
        "y": 0.32
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Piracy risk increases pressure to generate revenues early at box office; Audiences more likely to go watch 'tentpole' movies in theaters vs. at home; Studios could previously rely on home video revenues, eroded by piracy",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "92085f7b-4067-40b6-9114-48237e106d1d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.62,
        "y": 0.62
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "International audiences, especially Asia, highly receptive to movies with strong VFX; >50% of revenues now generated overseas",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f4db167d-9872-4c08-980d-450ba380c03b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Total budget spent: 697%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-acb5-76f0-a0a5-07c17ba208f9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.92
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: IMDB, BoxOfficeMojo, BCG analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e501e738-13a0-42d8-8ebb-cd79d6054e8d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.78
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "% change Total change '01-'04 vs.'11-'14",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e8039f4e-4dff-4b02-856c-6639b1acbac5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.07
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "In movies, across the industry we see concentration of dollars into large 'tentpole' productions",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "56a8be81-ef1d-4973-b105-ae3794578b64",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Total budget spent",
      "numberRaw": "697%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "In movies, across the industry we see concentration of dollars into large 'tentpole' productions",
      "calloutText": "7X growth in dollars spent on $150M+ budget movies in 2011-2014 vs. in 2001-2004",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 697,
      "metricFamily": "market_size",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1473-73fb-bbb2-3d05aef2c505",
      "evidence": "Title: 'concentration of dollars into large tentpole productions'",
      "confidence": 82
    },
    {
      "name": "Annotation",
      "slug": "annotation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1473-73fb-bbb2-41ae9681944a",
      "evidence": "Callout flags 7X growth in $150M+ budget movies",
      "confidence": 70
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "capital-allocation-framework",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "128a06d6-8c06-455a-b25c-924325661930",
      "evidence": "Analysis of budget concentration in high-value segments",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 38,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-591ed7ae15c0",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Data-rich analysis: TV growth, tourism, indie scene, digital, aggregate FTEs",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 78,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 38,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-6740b2f28d6f",
      "arcName": "The Mountain",
      "arcSlug": "mountain",
      "beatName": "Rising Action",
      "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action",
      "evidence": "Layered data across film, TV, theatre, digital",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 62,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 23,
      "from": 17,
      "name": "Ripple Effect",
      "slug": "26-ripple-effect",
      "bestFor": "Change management, scaling initiatives, demonstrating broad value",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-e8ee27713ee2",
      "evidence": "Tourism $45M, production-related 37K, indirect ~20K via spend ripple diagram",
      "position": 5,
      "objective": "Show how filming ripples through tourism + jobs",
      "structure": "Individual Impact -> Team Impact -> Organizational Impact -> Market/Industry Impact",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Show how impact spreads from individual to team to organization to market"
    },
    {
      "to": 21,
      "from": 19,
      "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
      "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
      "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-ec755314f43a",
      "evidence": "Concentration into $150M+ tentpoles vs variability + indie context",
      "position": 6,
      "objective": "Contrast tentpoles vs indies in movie spend",
      "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
      "confidence": 70,
      "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}