{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
  "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
  "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.401,
  "pageNumber": 99,
  "pageCount": 112,
  "prevPage": 98,
  "nextPage": 100,
  "slideType": "diagnosis",
  "function": "diagnose",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a causal mapping structure to link structural attributes to operational/governance risks.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "process_diagram"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/99",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-99",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Unique aspects of NYCHA Board structure vs Potential implications",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "comparison",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "181bcf74-f1d7-441c-8e90-2ec11c1bc44d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: NYCHA interviews",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "23d51fdb-45f7-46f8-ada4-e75b6b8a1213",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Some elements of NYCHA's current governance structure pose potential conflicts with this framework",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1f7b08cb-feac-4fb2-b883-96585acb890c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "causal-chain",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "fdb91d2a-cd4b-4674-867e-8914a69a64de",
      "evidence": "The slide maps specific structural attributes to their direct negative implications using arrows.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 102,
      "from": 95,
      "name": "Benchmark Gap",
      "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
      "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-1e9daff2c96d",
      "evidence": "p98 governance framework; p100-101 'unique vs PHAs / inconsistent with best practice'; p102 must-do changes.",
      "position": 14,
      "objective": "Diagnose NYCHA board governance against PHA peers and corporate best practice, then recommend changes",
      "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}