{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
  "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
  "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.401,
  "pageNumber": 20,
  "pageCount": 112,
  "prevPage": 19,
  "nextPage": 21,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 36,
  "notes": "The chart uses a box-plot style visualization to show 25th, median, and 75th percentiles for HR FTE ratios across industries.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "action_title",
    "bar_chart_horizontal",
    "subtitle_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "callout_box",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/20",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-20",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.67,
        "w": 0.24,
        "x": 0.75,
        "y": 0.19
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Potential future state\nNYCHA HR achieves best in class PHA, and median private sector benchmarks for relevant comps\n~100:1 Total FTE to HR FTE ratio\nOn base of ~12k employees...\n...implies ~55 FTE reduction...\nResults in ~120 FTE\nMay require a fundamental reassessment of activities & service levels\nBoth activities driven by regulatory environment and those that are not",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "af1ffb10-fa10-4f22-9b99-74770c28f7f6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Industry benchmarks suggest opportunity of ~55FTE reduction in HR",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-9f62-7003-b12f-e3972db1818d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.62,
        "w": 0.73,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.23
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Industry benchmarks suggest opportunity of ~55FTE reduction in HR",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f07924ec-1002-4f86-b765-8e6533f8b975",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.93
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "1. PHA benchmarks include SAHA, KCHA, PHA, NYCHA\nSource: IOMA - Exhibit 2.1-2 - HR Department Benchmark and Analysis Survey 2007-2008 BNA\nNYCHA Key Findings and Recommendations_15Aug2012_vFinal.pptx",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a9464279-b192-4699-a58d-8c13d794271f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "HR FTE reduction opportunity: ~55 FTE",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-9f62-7003-b12f-e5637b3aa70f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Example: used benchmarks to determine appropriate sizing and resourcing levels",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3dcd6863-b2e3-41b7-a6af-fd635737fe60",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "HR FTE reduction opportunity",
      "numberRaw": "~55 FTE",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": "Example: used benchmarks to determine appropriate sizing and resourcing levels",
      "calloutText": "Industry benchmarks suggest opportunity of ~55FTE reduction in HR",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 55,
      "metricFamily": "employment",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1474-7621-ae4c-b30f9911f09f",
      "evidence": "Title links benchmarks to sizing decision.",
      "confidence": 88
    },
    {
      "name": "Annotation",
      "slug": "annotation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1474-7621-ae4c-b51ddb903746",
      "evidence": "Callout: '~55 FTE reduction in HR' annotates benchmark.",
      "confidence": 70
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "peer_benchmark",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "bc982c6b-4271-4f0c-908d-ea303ea491ec",
      "evidence": "Comparison of internal metrics against industry standards",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 23,
      "from": 14,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e587ebad39a3",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "Lenses to identify opps; '$16B challenges, mutually reinforcing' on p23.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 95,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 21,
      "from": 17,
      "name": "Zoom In",
      "slug": "06-zoom-in",
      "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-f2d69ce24c40",
      "evidence": "Tenant-interview process diagnostic, systems example, org redesign, HR sizing, HR maturity ladder.",
      "position": 3,
      "objective": "Illustrate each opportunity type with a worked example",
      "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}