{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
  "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
  "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.401,
  "pageNumber": 101,
  "pageCount": 112,
  "prevPage": 100,
  "nextPage": 102,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses checkmarks and X marks to indicate adherence to governance standards.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "comparison_table",
    "icon_grid"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/101",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-101",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: BCG experience and analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fd48dde2-3f60-4676-a0e3-b30e6bd94cbc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison of Key dimensions and Other practices against governance standards",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a79a93a3-6c4f-4e10-8d87-4b79a004e5c9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "... And shows little consistency with best practices we observe in corporate governance models",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cabc3af5-e979-4138-9f35-3185a633db15",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1474-7621-ae4d-c2afcc6dda9c",
      "evidence": "Title '...little consistency with best practices we observe in corporate governance'.",
      "confidence": 85
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "governance",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "8fbf6f92-13b6-4e71-80c9-e08038c4dcb3",
      "evidence": "The slide evaluates corporate governance practices against a set of standards.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 102,
      "from": 95,
      "name": "Benchmark Gap",
      "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
      "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-1e9daff2c96d",
      "evidence": "p98 governance framework; p100-101 'unique vs PHAs / inconsistent with best practice'; p102 must-do changes.",
      "position": 14,
      "objective": "Diagnose NYCHA board governance against PHA peers and corporate best practice, then recommend changes",
      "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}