{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593",
  "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae",
  "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.294,
  "pageNumber": 15,
  "pageCount": 21,
  "prevPage": 14,
  "nextPage": 16,
  "slideType": "recommendation",
  "function": "recommend",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "Uses a qualitative pie-chart visual to represent performance levels (Worse to Better).",
  "elementsJson": [
    "action_title",
    "heatmap",
    "matrix_nxn",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/15",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-15",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.22,
        "x": 0.72,
        "y": 0.82
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "Worse to Better scale using pie chart icons",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8cfe0a02-96f0-488f-842f-cb119e74a871",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Option performance rating (Worse to Better)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-9f62-7003-b12b-217ad29f17b8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "1) Risk of failure to create sustainable market structure enabling continuing investment in newer greener trucks and enforceable safety/security\n2) Risk of near term disruption caused by BCO diversion\nNote: Short-term represents a 1-5 year time span and considers system condition and risks, while long-term represents 5+ years and is primarily based on sustainability",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9ca98d8e-32d1-41ae-b373-1e0e4a4c4395",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.88,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Matrix comparing Current State, Option I, II, and III across Environment, Port Operations, and Safety/Security.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "41b4975d-2aed-4233-8e76-a8df89a34efa",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.88,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Our overall conclusion: Option III provides the best path to long term sustainability, but with near term risks",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "396934cf-7ce7-4ea3-bdcc-3d49d034572f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1474-7621-ae49-a364fcefb2d7",
      "evidence": "Title states verdict: 'Option III provides the best path to long term sustainability'.",
      "confidence": 92
    },
    {
      "name": "Balanced scorecard",
      "slug": "balanced-scorecard",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "e3e9e6df-80b7-48ec-8d3a-d7352fd18931",
      "evidence": "table/data: Matrix comparing Current State, Option I, II, and III across Environment, Port Operations, and Safety/Security.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    {
      "name": "Picture Superiority Effect",
      "slug": "picture-superiority-effect",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1474-7621-ae49-a43ab28526b7",
      "evidence": "Harvey-ball matrix communicates relative scoring without reading text.",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "Small Multiples",
      "slug": "small-multiples",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1474-7621-ae49-a91a41dab220",
      "evidence": "3x6 grid of Harvey balls compares 3 dimensions across 3 options x 2 horizons.",
      "confidence": 82
    },
    {
      "name": "Weber-Fechner Law",
      "slug": "weber-fechner-law",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1474-7621-ae49-ac269285dad8",
      "evidence": "Graduated fill (empty/half/full) encodes magnitude of improvement perceptually.",
      "confidence": 60
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "635e26b5-a8b6-493f-9470-f4ee5d82380e",
      "evidence": "Matrix comparing strategic options against criteria",
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    {
      "name": "Harvey Balls",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1ca6-71be-9e59-989eed1d11d0",
      "evidence": "Empty/half/full circles with 'Worse <-> Better' legend across an option scorecard.",
      "confidence": 92
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 13,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a5668e465f0e",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Analytical model output, benefits/risks matrix, Harvey-ball scorecard.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 88,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 16,
      "from": 15,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b6add3d20d5c",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
      "evidence": "Option III chosen; unified-approach recommendation.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 13,
      "name": "Risk Reward Plot",
      "slug": "46-risk-reward-plot",
      "bestFor": "Investment decisions, project prioritization, strategic bets",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-b2457136824b",
      "evidence": "Quant model output -> benefits/risks per horizon -> Harvey-ball verdict naming Option III.",
      "position": 5,
      "objective": "Compare options on risk vs reward across short and long term to pick Option III",
      "structure": "The Options -> Risk Assessment -> Reward Assessment -> The Optimal Choice",
      "confidence": 84,
      "description": "Evaluate options by plotting risk against potential reward"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}