{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57",
  "docSlug": "0531041e5c74bb5b",
  "documentTitle": "Climate Change: BCG’s Perspectives and Offerings",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 30,
  "pageCount": 33,
  "prevPage": 29,
  "nextPage": 31,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 1,
  "notes": "Uses the Kodak vs. Fujifilm case study as an analogy for the oil industry's future.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "logo_grid",
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57/30",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57#slide-30",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.152,
        "y": 0.277
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "Kodak logo",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "logo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "aa9a28c8-c319-4938-bb85-98e907132722",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.574,
        "y": 0.277
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "Fujifilm logo",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "logo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f9985832-f159-4398-a16e-eeccb70a469e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.55,
        "y": 0.65
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "\"We are good with chemicals\"",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "68658e08-17d7-489c-b4d5-bef6e224ba10",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.55,
        "y": 0.81
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "...a leading Healthcare & Material Solutions company with a ~$25B market cap",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "896bc20d-d8fb-448d-a586-02e447595803",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.81
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "...bankruptcy",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b59e2203-ca70-4a1e-b505-ee0f8e2b2f24",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.65
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "\"We are a photography company\"",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f325a5d7-c615-4c04-9a68-c6f9b1cecf34",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Which oil company will be Kodak and which one Fuji?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "63496049-b7ea-43dd-bba7-3f4b31cedd76",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-12a5-7665-b705-233b627315be",
      "evidence": "Title 'Which oil company will be Kodak and which one Fuji?' poses the choice",
      "confidence": 90
    },
    {
      "name": "Emotional Appeal",
      "slug": "emotional-appeal",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-12a5-7665-b705-2a9035fbcc5c",
      "evidence": "'…bankruptcy' vs '$25B market cap' makes stakes visceral",
      "confidence": 75
    },
    {
      "name": "Metaphor & Analogy",
      "slug": "metaphor-analogy",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-12a5-7665-b705-2559605f4ced",
      "evidence": "Kodak/Fuji as direct disruption analogy",
      "confidence": 95
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "argument-from-analogy",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "3ddb7467-62bf-4d58-9f16-12a8ce5e3b29",
      "evidence": "Uses the historical case of Kodak vs Fujifilm to frame the future of oil companies.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 33,
      "from": 26,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ac4e95d4335b",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
      "evidence": "O&G strategic question, Kodak/Fuji choice, $1T+ opportunity, discussion",
      "position": 5,
      "confidence": 82,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    },
    {
      "to": 33,
      "from": 26,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-bbce0888c281",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
      "evidence": "O&G choice & opportunity sizing",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 31,
      "from": 27,
      "name": "Precedent",
      "slug": "09-precedent",
      "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-cde6346c3cc0",
      "evidence": "Hydrocarbon growth question → S&P share shrinking → Kodak vs Fuji precedent → $1T+ carbon-major opportunity",
      "position": 7,
      "objective": "reframe O&G strategic choice through Kodak/Fuji",
      "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning",
      "confidence": 82,
      "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}