{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-4f5c6d176926",
  "docSlug": "6bd7bf1c917770b7",
  "documentTitle": "BCG Investor Perspectives Series Q2 2023",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.681,
  "pageNumber": 15,
  "pageCount": 25,
  "prevPage": 14,
  "nextPage": 16,
  "slideType": "key_takeaways",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 4,
  "notes": "Data points: 32% (current), 47% (avg), 37% (Feb 2023) for continuing ESG; 30% (current), 39% (avg), 33% (Feb 2023) for doubling down.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "callout_box",
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-4f5c6d176926/15",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-4f5c6d176926",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-4f5c6d176926.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-4f5c6d176926#slide-15",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.68,
        "y": 0.255
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "US investors’ views regarding the importance of companies pursuing or even doubling down on their ESG agendas have weakened over time—and the percentage prioritizing ESG is now at a series low, highlighting a significant gap versus non-US investors that view ESG as a key agenda item (based on BCG’s 2023 Global Investor Survey)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ca3904ca-88a1-4dc1-875f-ccfe40c22ae6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "US investors’ views regarding the importance of companies pursuing or even doubling down on their ESG agendas have weakened over time—and the percentage prioritizing ESG is now at a series low, highlighting a significant gap versus non-US investors that view ESG as a key agenda item (based on BCG’s 2023 Global Investor Survey).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-acb8-762a-a742-6798259bc90c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.255
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "32% | Investors that think it is important to continue pursuing the ESG agenda and priorities as companies navigate the crisis, even if it means guiding to lower EPS or delivering below consensus. A series low, below the series average of 47% and the February 2023 result of 37%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2a503779-4ca3-4d68-9ffe-16864d7a3603",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.5
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "30% | Investors that say companies should double down on ESG initiatives that create value or reduce long-term risk, or both, even if it means guiding to lower EPS or delivering below consensus over the next 12 months. A series low, below the series average of 39% and the February 2023 result of 33%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "61342b5e-6357-49c1-aa32-08ea213a7cf5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Investor sentiment on ESG prioritization: 32%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-acb8-762a-a742-6b963e13c81a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.09,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.19
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "June 5–8",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ff417501-60da-4e7f-93ee-3c15e51f9f72",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.86
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: BCG Investor Perspectives Series, Q2 2023, June 5–8, 2023 (n = 151). Note: All questions were posed with respect to financially healthy companies... 1A series high, average, or low is a percentage that reflects a comparison across the 23 investor pulse checks. 2A global survey of 540 investors indicated that 58% of investors in Europe want financially healthy companies to continue pursuing their ESG agenda, while 56% support them in doubling down on ESG-related efforts. In Asia-Pacific, the shares of investors are 67% and 62%, respectively.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "243f4e29-c122-4071-a2dc-0cd0fb49998b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.06
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "In the current environment, investors appear to be giving financially healthy companies more leeway to compromise on ESG agendas and targets",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3b3c19e3-2b42-4bcf-b688-e5e790756acd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Investor sentiment on ESG prioritization",
      "numberRaw": "32%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "In the current environment, investors appear to be giving financially healthy companies more leeway to compromise on ESG agendas and targets",
      "calloutText": "US investors’ views regarding the importance of companies pursuing or even doubling down on their ESG agendas have weakened over time—and the percentage prioritizing ESG is now at a series low, highlighting a significant gap versus non-US investors that view ESG as a key agenda item (based on BCG’s 2023 Global Investor Survey).",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 32,
      "metricFamily": "survey_sentiment",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-12a5-7665-b6fc-360b37627e9a",
      "evidence": "Title 'investors appear to be giving financially healthy companies more leeway to compromise on ESG'",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "Audience Definition",
      "slug": "audience-definition",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "3f5a93bb-5007-4df2-9f4e-2d11b5a96aea",
      "evidence": "The slide mentions 'US investors' views' and presents data specific to their sentiment.",
      "confidence": 0.6
    },
    {
      "name": "Concrete Language",
      "slug": "concrete-language",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-12a5-7665-b6fc-3b89d81f4ff8",
      "evidence": "32% series-low statistic anchors the finding",
      "confidence": 75
    },
    {
      "name": "So What? Test",
      "slug": "so-what-test",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-12a5-7665-b6fc-3efc4fed9585",
      "evidence": "Callout interprets weakening ESG priority as series low",
      "confidence": 75
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 12,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-8a22dba6860f",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Core Insight",
      "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight",
      "evidence": "Trapped value root causes, M&A, dividends, ESG findings",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    },
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 3,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-91c19c9339fd",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "Survey findings and data charts dominate",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 45,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 13,
      "name": "Pattern Hunter",
      "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
      "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-adf19b62c277",
      "evidence": "Three sequential slides show acquisitions softening (57%), dividends at series high (68%), ESG weakening (32%) - pattern of caution and shifting priorities.",
      "position": 5,
      "objective": "Show shifting investor preferences across capital allocation levers",
      "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
      "confidence": 70,
      "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}