{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-33718c0bb3d5",
  "docSlug": "6cfacd78cbd42db5",
  "documentTitle": "Technology Foresight",
  "authorId": "ArthurDLittle",
  "authorName": "Arthur D. Little",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.707,
  "pageNumber": 5,
  "pageCount": 8,
  "prevPage": 4,
  "nextPage": 6,
  "slideType": "diagnosis",
  "function": "present_framework",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide presents a 'Checkerboard framework' which is a matrix-based diagnostic tool for technology assessment.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "matrix_nxn",
    "paragraph",
    "numbered_list"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-33718c0bb3d5/5",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-33718c0bb3d5",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-33718c0bb3d5.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-33718c0bb3d5#slide-5",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "framework",
      "text": "Checkerboard framework for technology shortlisting",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "instance",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6fc9dd0c-d539-4f3f-a03e-102aa7847ec9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.4
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "5. Select a mix of qualitative and quantitative criteria... 6. Adopt a holistic view of indicators... 7. Be consistent in your comparisons...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "44ee41de-9eca-4d01-9bc4-f8bd4c073f0d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.09
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Figure 3. Checkerboard framework for technology shortlisting",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "dba7e3fc-2f72-4542-9874-3127e198c98d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-10d4-718b-9f62-b70dbef8f7fc",
      "evidence": "Figure title 'Checkerboard framework for technology shortlisting' + imperative 7 'Be consistent in your comparisons'",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Gestalt Principles",
      "slug": "gestalt-principles",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-10d4-718b-9f62-ba3c414f2f15",
      "evidence": "Push row vs Pull row enclosed cells with iconography group dimensions visually",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Visual Anchors",
      "slug": "visual-anchors",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-10d4-718b-9f62-bc773c20f3d8",
      "evidence": "PUSH/PULL labels + dimension headers act as eye anchors guiding scan of the matrix",
      "confidence": 55
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "ADL Checkerboard Framework",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1ca5-70bb-bba1-b64c28346e39",
      "evidence": "Figure 3 'Checkerboard framework for technology shortlisting' — Push/Pull rows x R&D/Business/Public Policy/Sector/Consumer columns",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "matrix-nxn",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "13a74f39-2fa2-473a-a67d-f66f3a53ae87",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly labels the visual as a 'Checkerboard framework' organizing dimensions into a grid.",
      "confidence": 0.95
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 3,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e37-f124cdbe7732",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "10 strategic imperatives walked through pp3-6",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 75,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    },
    {
      "to": 5,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e37-f6a736ddaf5e",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Figure 2 gated approach, Figure 3 checkerboard, Graphene Flagship + solar PV examples",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 75,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 3,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e38-03e7401ed786",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "10 imperatives = implications for getting foresight right",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 3,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d40-1a7a4dc5e49d",
      "evidence": "Numbered 10 imperatives covering horizon, alignment, pragmatism, push/pull, indicators, comparisons, sector nuances, expert bias, and ongoing process — distinct categories aiming for completeness.",
      "position": 2,
      "objective": "Break technology foresight success into 10 distinct imperatives",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}