{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5",
  "docSlug": "75154b823290a109",
  "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey",
  "authorId": "Accenture",
  "authorName": "Accenture",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 34,
  "pageCount": 58,
  "prevPage": 33,
  "nextPage": 35,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 50,
  "notes": "Includes a yellow highlight box on the chart for specific account size segments.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_100pct",
    "callout_box",
    "numbered_list",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/34",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-34",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.8
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Remarks: 1. A higher percentage of personal lines underwriters consider the use of AI and NLP to be superior, than underwriters focused on commercial lines. 2. Underwriters focused on mid-size to large accounts ($10-250K) consider their organizations' use of AI and NLP to be deficient to a greater extent than underwriters of other account sizes.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "020e7fe6-29a3-428f-acb0-f60944824af2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Underwriters focused on mid-size to large accounts ($10-250K) consider their organizations' use of AI and NLP is deficient to a greater extent than underwriters of other account sizes",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-9f64-72ba-b416-22a8be3bbc36",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Stacked bar charts showing survey responses by line of business and account size.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked-100pct",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "49fb9c1b-fe61-465c-a73c-b035f0bb1d93",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.74
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "Don't know, 1 - Deficient, 2, 3 - Average, 4, 5 - Superior",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "961fb911-58e1-4e76-83f6-0072156a0a60",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.82,
        "y": 0.75
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Total responses = 434; Personal lines = 76; Commercial lines = 295; Specialty = 50; Reinsurance = 13; <$10K = 111; $10-49K = 104; $50-249K = 128; +$250K = 91",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "990e6931-c11b-4751-a285-ad9d1add67d5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Underwriter rating of AI/NLP use for document extraction (5-point scale): 434",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-9f64-72ba-b416-2656d3e8ea7b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: 2021 P&C Underwriting Survey",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "68888620-f86b-4782-bcd2-a52cf81a884b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.13
      },
      "kind": "subtitle",
      "text": "Q7: How would you rate your organization's use of AI or NLP to extract information from documents today to improve the efficiency of the underwriting process?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1d4b6840-74e6-4fa0-bc3c-9f92926de52a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "USE OF AI OR NLP TO EXTRACT INFORMATION FROM DOCUMENTS",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "661c94b2-b828-4d75-aa5d-8870fff6efd2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Underwriter rating of AI/NLP use for document extraction (5-point scale)",
      "numberRaw": "434",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": null,
      "calloutText": "Underwriters focused on mid-size to large accounts ($10-250K) consider their organizations' use of AI and NLP is deficient to a greater extent than underwriters of other account sizes",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 434,
      "metricFamily": "index_score",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Annotation",
      "slug": "annotation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de0ed-b281-701a-897a-2e33b13f99bd",
      "evidence": "Yellow-dashed highlights direct attention to mid-account deficiencies.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de0ed-b259-70b9-82fa-deee09f21f77",
      "evidence": "Two stacked bars (LOB / account size) on AI-NLP usage.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "129af41e-c787-4c2e-8c3b-b4460c49403a",
      "evidence": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show survey responses by line of business and account size.",
      "confidence": 0.6
    },
    {
      "name": "Data Story Arc",
      "slug": "data-story-arc",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "fe60b693-448e-462e-b520-b6b3efbff9bf",
      "evidence": "The slide presents a survey result in a structured manner, with a clear question, data, and insights.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 37,
      "from": 23,
      "beatId": "019de0ed-a5b8-732e-b7b7-b08c381f0615",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Deeper Layer",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Quality and Efficiency sections show declines vs 2008/2013.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 54,
      "from": 23,
      "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 50,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 37,
      "from": 31,
      "name": "Maturity Curve",
      "slug": "36-maturity-curve",
      "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking",
      "matchId": "019de0ed-a789-723a-96f6-128c62bc5981",
      "evidence": "p.32 current solution ratings; p.35 planned investments; p.37 2013 vs 2021 automation.",
      "position": 5,
      "objective": "Diagnose current efficiency maturity and required investment roadmap",
      "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap",
      "confidence": 60,
      "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}