{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5",
  "docSlug": "75154b823290a109",
  "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey",
  "authorId": "Accenture",
  "authorName": "Accenture",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 29,
  "pageCount": 58,
  "prevPage": 28,
  "nextPage": 30,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 10,
  "notes": "The chart highlights differences in perceived importance of risk evaluation tools and third-party data based on account size.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_grouped",
    "bullet_list",
    "callout_box",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/29",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-29",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "A lower percentage of small accounts underwriters consider risks comparison analytics as important or very important, but a higher percentage see the availability of third-party data as important or very important",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-9f64-72ba-b415-43898e25661b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Grouped bar chart showing importance percentages for two categories across five segments (Overall, <$10K, $10-49K, $50-249K, +$250K)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2d58d4c1-92e4-4ec4-96df-bd6b88b5420e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.75
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "Overall, <$10K, $10-49K, $50-249K, +$250K",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9ffe046a-400b-41b5-80c2-678d641a7ac7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.68,
        "y": 0.435
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Showing areas with greatest differences among account sizes\nNo significant differences identified by line of business",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c9a10182-e9e5-4c79-bf4d-c63c6d09913f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "% rating area as important or very important: 90%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-9f64-72ba-b415-4681e48e56c1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.86
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Remarks: A lower percentage of small accounts underwriters consider risks comparison analytics as important or very important, but a higher percentage see the availability of third-party data as important or very important",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "12d91be0-39df-4361-9001-07ab7e3ef173",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.13
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Q6: When considering how to improve the quality of your organization's underwriting, how would you rate the importance of each of the following areas?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5a676754-0e5a-4f1e-a296-5085203d8110",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: 2021 P&C Underwriting Survey",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "500e0832-9612-4fca-a614-e840a684ebfb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.8,
        "y": 0.83
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Total responses = 434; >$10K = 111; $10-49K = 104; $50-249K = 128; +$250K = 91",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "798c5db1-c25b-4b00-aad9-ed27588da3a9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.27,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "IMPORTANCE BY AREA",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "554d97e7-0599-414e-84e4-c5a145a02632",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "% rating area as important or very important",
      "numberRaw": "90%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": null,
      "calloutText": "A lower percentage of small accounts underwriters consider risks comparison analytics as important or very important, but a higher percentage see the availability of third-party data as important or very important",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 90,
      "metricFamily": "index_score",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Annotation",
      "slug": "annotation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de0ed-b112-733c-8688-d9f963b28053",
      "evidence": "Remarks callout interprets small vs large account differences.",
      "confidence": 60
    },
    {
      "name": "Small Multiples",
      "slug": "small-multiples",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de0ed-b0ea-7658-b3ba-b5e7a7484496",
      "evidence": "Two grouped bar charts share legend across account sizes.",
      "confidence": 65
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 37,
      "from": 23,
      "beatId": "019de0ed-a5b8-732e-b7b7-b08c381f0615",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Deeper Layer",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Quality and Efficiency sections show declines vs 2008/2013.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 54,
      "from": 23,
      "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 50,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 24,
      "name": "Benchmark Gap",
      "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
      "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
      "matchId": "019de0ed-a761-728a-8f20-bfb42802132a",
      "evidence": "p.27 explicit 2008/2013/2021 comparison; p.28 priority areas.",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Show quality has declined and identify priority gaps",
      "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
      "confidence": 75,
      "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}