{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-a5d9d0ad08c3",
  "docSlug": "ad9a13b04ea9e860",
  "documentTitle": "Value untangled Amplify speed to value through interoperability",
  "authorId": "Accenture",
  "authorName": "Accenture",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 33,
  "pageCount": 39,
  "prevPage": 32,
  "nextPage": 34,
  "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
  "function": "present_framework",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 2,
  "notes": "The slide describes a segmentation approach based on two variables (Diversity and Interoperability) to create three distinct groups for performance analysis.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph",
    "headline_text",
    "photo"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-a5d9d0ad08c3/33",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-a5d9d0ad08c3",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-a5d9d0ad08c3.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-a5d9d0ad08c3#slide-33",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "In Growth Markets, each group had roughly a third of the respondents (~33%, or ~430).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-9f67-75d3-8bf9-db9152fbf6c7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.646,
        "w": 0.302,
        "x": 0.656,
        "y": 0.182
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": null,
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "photo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4f4c2ef0-6bfe-48f7-93e7-c59fc0e4be30",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Global respondents grouped: 4,053",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-9f67-75d3-8bf9-df677688f618",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.115,
        "w": 0.238,
        "x": 0.403,
        "y": 0.513
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Using the definitions above, we compared the difference in performance between these three groups—with metrics such as cost savings, revenue growth, employee productivity, and how successful they have been at achieving business goals such as reinventing customer experience and achieving efficiency in supply chain operations.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "88ab81c7-006a-4217-893a-f8d4aa3c7eaf",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.405,
        "w": 0.355,
        "x": 0.141,
        "y": 0.257
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Using these two indexes as dummy variables, we grouped all global 4,053 as well as 1,292 respondents in Growth Markets into three groups. The first group, which had not improved Diversity over the last two years, regardless of their Interoperability score, was named companies with low/no interoperability. The second group, which had improved Diversity but not improved its Interoperability was called companies with medium interoperability. The remaining respondents, who had improved both their Diversity and Interoperability were named high interoperability. In Growth Markets, each group had roughly a third of the respondents (~33%, or ~430). In other words, we identified three equal sized groups of companies, one of which was in ecosystem stasis (companies with low/no interoperability), one that was expanding ecosystems but not improving integration (companies with medium interoperability), and finally, one that was leading in terms of both ecosystem expansion and integration across these ecosystems (companies with high interoperability). We then investigated how being in each group correlates to measures of performance.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "93beffb1-37fd-4322-aa50-0d40fbe3a39d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.022,
        "w": 0.115,
        "x": 0.174,
        "y": 0.088
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "6. Methodology",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d3c66a8c-7c6a-4ab3-8d78-8c1a83898394",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.045,
        "w": 0.185,
        "x": 0.403,
        "y": 0.455
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Calculation of the performance difference",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "subtitle",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f63c08be-58fe-4a83-b69a-1ab96a9bf093",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Global respondents grouped",
      "numberRaw": "4,053",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": null,
      "calloutText": "In Growth Markets, each group had roughly a third of the respondents (~33%, or ~430).",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 4.053,
      "metricFamily": "survey_sentiment",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Analytical method",
      "slug": "analytical-method",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "8b435453-11f4-419c-a1c7-4ffa427a234c",
      "evidence": "Using these two indexes as dummy variables, we grouped all global 4,053 as well as 1,292 respondents in Growth Markets into three groups.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "market-segmentation-pyramid",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "3dc50277-819e-450e-a269-dbeea82a7cbe",
      "evidence": "The slide describes grouping respondents into three distinct segments based on two variables to analyze performance.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}