{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8",
  "docSlug": "4c67116c5e4fca81",
  "documentTitle": "Reinventing for resilience",
  "authorId": "Accenture",
  "authorName": "Accenture",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 14,
  "pageCount": 30,
  "prevPage": 13,
  "nextPage": 15,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 8,
  "notes": "Figure 5. Uses a 2x2 matrix structure to segment companies based on performance.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "action_title",
    "paragraph",
    "scatter_plot",
    "quadrant_chart",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8/14",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8#slide-14",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Almost half of long-term profitable growth companies achieve higher than average scores across financial, business and technology dimensions.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-9f64-72ba-b3fa-a67f3831d958",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.735,
        "w": 0.912,
        "x": 0.315,
        "y": 0.218
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Scatter plot of company performance",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "scatter",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1412a029-5731-4eba-a8ac-3833e1429703",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.735,
        "w": 0.912,
        "x": 0.315,
        "y": 0.218
      },
      "kind": "framework",
      "text": null,
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "instance",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "af6e2aa4-178a-4c23-9e61-d3bf95bc9157",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "framework",
      "text": "2x2 Matrix",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Structuring frame",
      "toolSlug": "structuring-frame",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-9f64-72ba-b3fa-ace2f843b654",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.69,
        "w": 0.56,
        "x": 0.348,
        "y": 0.242
      },
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "29% / 15% / 47% / 12% / 11% / 45% / 14% / 27%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "big-number",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4f458ffe-4522-496d-b8a4-28696f49fe8a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Share of companies in high-high quadrant (Financial x Business & Technology): 47%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-9f64-72ba-b3fa-aba67caa9cd0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.145,
        "w": 0.275,
        "x": 0.058,
        "y": 0.143
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "These companies concurrently exhibit keen financial discipline and stronger business and technology capabilities. Almost half of long-term profitable growth companies achieve higher than average scores across financial, business and technology dimensions.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d4bbc0d4-1ce2-4a5c-a9ec-1594d8acf129",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.012,
        "w": 0.38,
        "x": 0.338,
        "y": 0.822
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Accenture Research analysis of 1,615 global public companies.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "79f726f1-4ca1-4884-b5b7-6439162c0c15",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.842,
        "x": 0.315,
        "y": 0.178
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "More long-term profitable growth companies score high in financial and business & technology dimensions",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9937a1ca-2b4c-4c20-b403-96ac81afd4e1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Share of companies in high-high quadrant (Financial x Business & Technology)",
      "numberRaw": "47%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "More long-term profitable growth companies score high in financial and business & technology dimensions",
      "calloutText": "Almost half of long-term profitable growth companies achieve higher than average scores across financial, business and technology dimensions.",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 47,
      "metricFamily": "survey_sentiment",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Contrast Pairs",
      "slug": "contrast-pairs",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "loop",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0e8a-77b7-b1f8-8f9b59cc07e4",
      "evidence": "Visual contrast: long-term leaders vs low-growth/low-profit.",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "b930df37-ab1b-4565-9670-1094903eb630",
      "evidence": "chart/scatter: Scatter plot of company performance",
      "confidence": 0.8
    },
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0e8a-77b7-b1f8-7ce8dd5d2352",
      "evidence": "Title quotes the finding: 'score high in financial and business & technology'.",
      "confidence": 92
    },
    {
      "name": "Annotation",
      "slug": "annotation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0e8a-77b7-b1f8-8665c4f682ea",
      "evidence": "Quadrant labels '47%/12%, 11%/45%' annotate cohort split.",
      "confidence": 90
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0e8a-77b7-b1f8-82a9b0f401d2",
      "evidence": "Scatter on Financial x Business&Technology axes.",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Color Strategy",
      "slug": "color-strategy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0e8a-77b7-b1f8-8943928741c9",
      "evidence": "Solid purple = leaders, hollow = laggards.",
      "confidence": 80
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 Matrix",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1ca5-70bb-bb9e-7306220448c9",
      "evidence": "Axes Financial x Business & Technology with quadrant percentages.",
      "confidence": 90
    },
    {
      "name": "matrix-2x2",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "e11c0594-35ec-4f56-95e4-fbcbcc6fe4e4",
      "evidence": "The chart uses a quadrant layout to compare two dimensions (Financial vs Business & Technology) across two company types.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 22,
      "from": 14,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-0355ac434d2d",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Scatter, gap charts, +7pp/-3pp, 70% benchmark prove leaders' edge.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 90,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 17,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-0aa83e93e7d6",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "Disruption rising; leaders outperform on Resilience Index.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 17,
      "from": 14,
      "name": "Benchmark Gap",
      "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
      "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-15af582aa7f0",
      "evidence": "Scatter (47% vs 14%), 13.5pp profit gap, 16pp resilience gap.",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Quantify gap between leaders and rest across capabilities",
      "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
      "confidence": 88,
      "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}