{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-29727d44f101",
  "docSlug": "0e02124818fafd32",
  "documentTitle": "Innovate or Fade European businesses need to address the technology deficit to turn the tide",
  "authorId": "Accenture",
  "authorName": "Accenture",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 22,
  "pageCount": 35,
  "prevPage": 21,
  "nextPage": 23,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": "Figure 7 from a larger report; includes methodology details in the footer text.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "action_title",
    "bar_chart_grouped",
    "paragraph",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-29727d44f101/22",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-29727d44f101",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-29727d44f101.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-29727d44f101#slide-22",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "When it comes to patent activity, a considerably lower share of European companies file AI related patents. This gap widens even further for generative AI, as illustrated in Figure 7.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-9f60-73de-a945-656dd802ca14",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.39,
        "y": 0.26
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Share of companies, AI filings vs GenAI filings by region",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4c4814a0-fea5-4297-851f-e9db965b6c31",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Share of companies filing AI / GenAI patents: 60%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-9f60-73de-a945-69857aa0e0b1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.39,
        "y": 0.6
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Analyzing ~ 2100 public companies. 777 companies are aligned to a unique assignee code, as they are highly active in filing patents (characterized by DWPI C-Coded alignment): 280 European HQ companies, 230 North America, 267 APAC. Out of these 777 companies, 584 companies have filed ~108K priority patents 2010-2021/9months (last fully published filing data) in the context of AI (searched by keywords and classification codes): 169 European HQ companies (60% of 280). 178 North America (77% of 230), 237 APAC (89% out of 267). Closer context of GenAI (keywords in the abstract) resulting in 431 filing companies, representing 18K priority patents: 96 European HQ companies (34% of 280), 139 North America (60% of 230), 196 APAC (73% of 267).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "08211720-df6c-405a-9926-cecab4df2090",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "When it comes to patent activity, a considerably lower share of European companies file AI related patents. This gap widens even further for generative AI, as illustrated in Figure 7. Moreover, European companies show less inclination to innovate within their own region compared to their North American or APAC counterparts (see Figure 8), exerting a negative impact on the innovation ecosystem in Europe.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "36950673-018d-424e-bdc9-461a7e977c64",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.39,
        "y": 0.82
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Accenture Research based on Derwent Innovation™ (Clarivate©, 2023), CapIQ.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b7ea580f-51ae-4379-8036-4325486d1601",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.39,
        "y": 0.175
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Europe lags in the share of AI patents (2010-2021/09)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "37b310e5-d50a-4500-95a8-56ebec461f5c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Share of companies filing AI / GenAI patents",
      "numberRaw": "60%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "Europe lags in the share of AI patents (2010-2021/09)",
      "calloutText": "When it comes to patent activity, a considerably lower share of European companies file AI related patents. This gap widens even further for generative AI, as illustrated in Figure 7.",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 60,
      "metricFamily": "survey_sentiment",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0d40-7758-be3a-a992dc0d44ea",
      "evidence": "'Europe lags in the share of AI patents (2010-2021/09)'",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "a576398d-1103-4658-b5a8-64182b2c7e89",
      "evidence": "chart/bar-grouped: Share of companies, AI filings vs GenAI filings by region",
      "confidence": 0.6
    },
    {
      "name": "Concrete Language",
      "slug": "concrete-language",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0d40-7758-be3a-adfce98eb403",
      "evidence": "60% specific share figure",
      "confidence": 75
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 26,
      "from": 18,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-4c0487de7056",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Benchmark charts: R&D gap, AI patents, board tech maturity vs NA/APAC",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 26,
      "from": 12,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-58b905426505",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Three implications converted into recommendations and benchmark proof",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 24,
      "from": 17,
      "name": "Benchmark Gap",
      "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
      "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-66cbaac7fc6e",
      "evidence": "Rec 2 'Extend advantage in smart manufacturing' followed by R&D-as-%-revenue line chart (p21), AI-patent share (p22), HQ-region patents (p23), and Key steps (p24).",
      "position": 5,
      "objective": "Quantify Europe's R&D and innovation gap vs NA/APAC",
      "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
      "confidence": 90,
      "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}