{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437",
  "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d",
  "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES",
  "authorId": "Accenture",
  "authorName": "Accenture",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 9,
  "pageCount": 34,
  "prevPage": 8,
  "nextPage": 10,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 10,
  "notes": null,
  "elementsJson": [
    "action_title",
    "subtitle_text",
    "bar_chart_horizontal",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/9",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-9",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Top 10 outcomes targeted by Automotive – OES companies through scaling of digital PoCs",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-9f63-7414-b6a6-154771731ccb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Horizontal bar chart showing 10 outcomes with percentages ranging from 32% to 36%.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a252671a-3347-4ba1-96e5-cf71d66e3e58",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "% of respondents who achieved this outcome: 36%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-9f63-7414-b6a6-1a6611654a82",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.75,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Accenture 2019 Industry X.0 Survey",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "492b2474-1d22-4453-be92-4f8ffe572dd5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "ANOMALY DETECTION AND PURCHASE ORDER MANAGEMENT ARE KEY OUTCOMES...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1040f6a4-d24b-4b6c-9465-ca0a9b33908d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Top 10 outcomes targeted by Automotive – OES companies through scaling of digital PoCs",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "subtitle",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "40aa66be-047e-4189-a823-e915084d0588",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "% of respondents who achieved this outcome",
      "numberRaw": "36%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "ANOMALY DETECTION AND PURCHASE ORDER MANAGEMENT ARE KEY OUTCOMES…",
      "calloutText": "Top 10 outcomes targeted by Automotive – OES companies through scaling of digital PoCs",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 36,
      "metricFamily": "survey_sentiment",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de0c4-993d-724a-b967-39f7abac3cb0",
      "evidence": "Title names the key outcomes (anomaly detection, PO management).",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "Annotation",
      "slug": "annotation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de0c4-9986-7731-a3d2-763d9aa2fc97",
      "evidence": "Top-10 outcomes labeled directly on bars.",
      "confidence": 65
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de0c4-9961-73f2-adf3-1df34a31733c",
      "evidence": "Horizontal bar ranking is right choice for top-N list.",
      "confidence": 82
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 18,
      "from": 8,
      "beatId": "019de0c4-9356-77a3-8ed2-0eb71e802e2f",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Champions vs Cadets gap, funding/alignment roadblocks, cost of inaction",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 88,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 13,
      "from": 3,
      "beatId": "019de0c4-940d-76e1-ad2b-fc3bee58b32e",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "survey scope and Champions/Contenders/Cadets RODI facts",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 62,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 6,
      "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
      "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
      "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
      "matchId": "019de0c4-94a0-729e-b3e3-8a202cf6d746",
      "evidence": "Every chart in p6-10 is a paired Auto-OES vs Cross-Industry / function comparison.",
      "position": 2,
      "objective": "Compare Auto-OES vs Cross-Industry on innovation priorities, scaling, outcomes and tech",
      "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
      "confidence": 85,
      "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}