{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 88, "pageSize": 30, "pageCount": 10666, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "docSlug": "7373eac28d11a5fc", "documentTitle": "BCG Investor Perspectives Series Q4 2023", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.681, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The table uses color-coded cells to indicate significant/moderate increases or decreases in sentiment metrics.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 19, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-c2b675271658", "evidence": "Seven-page table titled 'Comparison of BCG's investor pulse checks' shows series highs/lows.", "position": 5, "objective": "Compare current pulse check against 23 prior pulse checks", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 78, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-a9d0ae06b91c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Leverage, ESG and 7-page historical pulse-check comparison tables", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 26, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-b8f06e50524e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Historical comparison tables and CTA contact slide", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "docSlug": "7373eac28d11a5fc", "documentTitle": "BCG Investor Perspectives Series Q4 2023", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.681, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table tracks investor sentiment on corporate priorities like ESG, capital allocation, and M&A throughout 2020.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 19, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-c2b675271658", "evidence": "Seven-page table titled 'Comparison of BCG's investor pulse checks' shows series highs/lows.", "position": 5, "objective": "Compare current pulse check against 23 prior pulse checks", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 78, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-a9d0ae06b91c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Leverage, ESG and 7-page historical pulse-check comparison tables", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 26, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-b8f06e50524e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Historical comparison tables and CTA contact slide", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "docSlug": "7373eac28d11a5fc", "documentTitle": "BCG Investor Perspectives Series Q4 2023", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.681, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table uses color-coded cells in the final column to indicate the direction and magnitude of change in investor sentiment.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 19, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-c2b675271658", "evidence": "Seven-page table titled 'Comparison of BCG's investor pulse checks' shows series highs/lows.", "position": 5, "objective": "Compare current pulse check against 23 prior pulse checks", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 78, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-a9d0ae06b91c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Leverage, ESG and 7-page historical pulse-check comparison tables", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 26, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-b8f06e50524e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Historical comparison tables and CTA contact slide", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "docSlug": "7373eac28d11a5fc", "documentTitle": "BCG Investor Perspectives Series Q4 2023", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.681, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The table uses color-coded cells in the final column to indicate the magnitude and direction of change in risk perception.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 19, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-c2b675271658", "evidence": "Seven-page table titled 'Comparison of BCG's investor pulse checks' shows series highs/lows.", "position": 5, "objective": "Compare current pulse check against 23 prior pulse checks", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 78, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-a9d0ae06b91c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Leverage, ESG and 7-page historical pulse-check comparison tables", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 26, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-b8f06e50524e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Historical comparison tables and CTA contact slide", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "docSlug": "7373eac28d11a5fc", "documentTitle": "BCG Investor Perspectives Series Q4 2023", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.681, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The table tracks the percentage of investors ranking specific criteria in their top three considerations, with a final column showing the delta between June 8 and Oct 11, 2023.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 19, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-c2b675271658", "evidence": "Seven-page table titled 'Comparison of BCG's investor pulse checks' shows series highs/lows.", "position": 5, "objective": "Compare current pulse check against 23 prior pulse checks", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 78, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-a9d0ae06b91c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Leverage, ESG and 7-page historical pulse-check comparison tables", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 26, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-b8f06e50524e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Historical comparison tables and CTA contact slide", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "docSlug": "7373eac28d11a5fc", "documentTitle": "BCG Investor Perspectives Series Q4 2023", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.681, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table tracks the percentage of investors ranking specific criteria in their top three considerations. Color coding indicates the direction of change in importance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 19, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-c2b675271658", "evidence": "Seven-page table titled 'Comparison of BCG's investor pulse checks' shows series highs/lows.", "position": 5, "objective": "Compare current pulse check against 23 prior pulse checks", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 78, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-a9d0ae06b91c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Leverage, ESG and 7-page historical pulse-check comparison tables", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 26, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-b8f06e50524e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Historical comparison tables and CTA contact slide", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "docSlug": "7373eac28d11a5fc", "documentTitle": "BCG Investor Perspectives Series Q4 2023", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.681, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "appendix", "function": "other", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0#slide-26", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 26, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-ae301c9d80c5", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "BCG contact slide and disclaimer close out the deck", "position": 5, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 26, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-b8f06e50524e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Historical comparison tables and CTA contact slide", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "docSlug": "7373eac28d11a5fc", "documentTitle": "BCG Investor Perspectives Series Q4 2023", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.681, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "disclaimer", "function": "other", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0#slide-27", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 26, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-ae301c9d80c5", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "BCG contact slide and disclaimer close out the deck", "position": 5, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "docSlug": "bc0ba3d90f68cf59", "documentTitle": "Beyond good intentions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/U5e8eHZGyJEju0PvZnQGTdRXjqAr_CcoV0-YU0uy4Bc/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iYzBiYTNkOTBmNjhjZjU5L3AwMDEuanBn", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2#slide-1", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-dfe3833a5527", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, executive summary and methodology framing the D&I study", "position": 1, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/2qEKOUebmiNvnrqdYwdp5NgBZj1Qxz-9rb9u40H4d4Q/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iYzBiYTNkOTBmNjhjZjU5L3AwMDEucG5n", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/fef6cYtBaoOsvAOttHdc8m3D7wp90DgXbaZwgGa-AhM/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iYzBiYTNkOTBmNjhjZjU5L3AwMDEuanBn", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/-dOeLUEhXuhzTXP5VzEAveNYJn4v17CRLto-ugUEQ74/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iYzBiYTNkOTBmNjhjZjU5L3AwMDEucG5n" }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "docSlug": "bc0ba3d90f68cf59", "documentTitle": "Beyond good intentions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Includes an illustration of a diverse group of people at the bottom.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2#slide-2", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-dfe3833a5527", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, executive summary and methodology framing the D&I study", "position": 1, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "docSlug": "bc0ba3d90f68cf59", "documentTitle": "Beyond good intentions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "front_matter", "notes": "Includes signatures of six BCG partners/directors and a footnote regarding survey methodology.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2#slide-3", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-dfe3833a5527", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, executive summary and methodology framing the D&I study", "position": 1, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "docSlug": "bc0ba3d90f68cf59", "documentTitle": "Beyond good intentions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "Includes a mix of bar charts for discrimination metrics and a grouped bar/line chart for workplace obstacles by career stage.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 4, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-dab8d4d86583", "evidence": "p4 visible obstacles -> p5-6 hidden perception gap diverse vs control / exec vs non-exec -> p7 leadership-commitment root cause.", "position": 1, "objective": "Surface the hidden perception gap underneath the visible obstacles", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 78, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-e1a3ac0804dc", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Obstacles, perception gaps, executive optimism, leadership-commitment failure", "position": 2, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 7, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-f2b0a83684eb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey data on obstacles and perception gaps", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "docSlug": "bc0ba3d90f68cf59", "documentTitle": "Beyond good intentions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a 'control group' (white, heterosexual men) to establish a baseline for comparison.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 4, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-dab8d4d86583", "evidence": "p4 visible obstacles -> p5-6 hidden perception gap diverse vs control / exec vs non-exec -> p7 leadership-commitment root cause.", "position": 1, "objective": "Surface the hidden perception gap underneath the visible obstacles", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 78, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-e1a3ac0804dc", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Obstacles, perception gaps, executive optimism, leadership-commitment failure", "position": 2, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 7, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-f2b0a83684eb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey data on obstacles and perception gaps", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "docSlug": "bc0ba3d90f68cf59", "documentTitle": "Beyond good intentions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a series of bar charts to illustrate the 'perception gap' between leadership and employees regarding D&I progress.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 4, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-dab8d4d86583", "evidence": "p4 visible obstacles -> p5-6 hidden perception gap diverse vs control / exec vs non-exec -> p7 leadership-commitment root cause.", "position": 1, "objective": "Surface the hidden perception gap underneath the visible obstacles", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 78, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-e1a3ac0804dc", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Obstacles, perception gaps, executive optimism, leadership-commitment failure", "position": 2, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 7, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-f2b0a83684eb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey data on obstacles and perception gaps", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "docSlug": "bc0ba3d90f68cf59", "documentTitle": "Beyond good intentions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a slope-like connection between two states (Don't agree vs Agree) for three demographic groups.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 4, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-dab8d4d86583", "evidence": "p4 visible obstacles -> p5-6 hidden perception gap diverse vs control / exec vs non-exec -> p7 leadership-commitment root cause.", "position": 1, "objective": "Surface the hidden perception gap underneath the visible obstacles", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 78, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-e1a3ac0804dc", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Obstacles, perception gaps, executive optimism, leadership-commitment failure", "position": 2, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 7, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-f2b0a83684eb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey data on obstacles and perception gaps", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "docSlug": "bc0ba3d90f68cf59", "documentTitle": "Beyond good intentions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a dual-axis scatter plot to compare two states (with vs without allies) across different demographic groups.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 8, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-dcc79b92ac6a", "evidence": "p8 sets up question and reveals 1.6x ally insight; p9 shows shared-program insight across groups.", "position": 2, "objective": "Reveal that allies + the right portfolio of programs is the lever", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 80, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-e7957d067289", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Allies and programs as levers; three calls to action", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 9, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-f5d7227dea9e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Allies matter 1.6x; common program preferences", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "docSlug": "bc0ba3d90f68cf59", "documentTitle": "Beyond good intentions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table uses color-coding to indicate how many of the four groups ranked each intervention in their top 10.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 8, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-dcc79b92ac6a", "evidence": "p8 sets up question and reveals 1.6x ally insight; p9 shows shared-program insight across groups.", "position": 2, "objective": "Reveal that allies + the right portfolio of programs is the lever", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 80, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-e7957d067289", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Allies and programs as levers; three calls to action", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 9, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-f5d7227dea9e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Allies matter 1.6x; common program preferences", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "docSlug": "bc0ba3d90f68cf59", "documentTitle": "Beyond good intentions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a split-layout: left side for the three strategic pillars, right side for a detailed case study of BMO.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-e144f5764afd", "evidence": "p10 lists three calls; p11 BMO/CPPIB, p12 Suncor, p13 Sherritt as paired precedent cases.", "position": 3, "objective": "Prove each of the three calls to action with a real-company case", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 82, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-e7957d067289", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Allies and programs as levers; three calls to action", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 13, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-fb94e93467c8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Three calls to action with three case studies", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "docSlug": "bc0ba3d90f68cf59", "documentTitle": "Beyond good intentions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Includes a pull-quote from Karen Sihra, Director of Inclusion and Diversity at CPPIB.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-e144f5764afd", "evidence": "p10 lists three calls; p11 BMO/CPPIB, p12 Suncor, p13 Sherritt as paired precedent cases.", "position": 3, "objective": "Prove each of the three calls to action with a real-company case", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 82, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-eaa2ada5470c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "CPPIB and Suncor case studies validating the calls", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 13, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-fb94e93467c8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Three calls to action with three case studies", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "docSlug": "bc0ba3d90f68cf59", "documentTitle": "Beyond good intentions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Includes a pull quote from Arlene Strom and a detailed narrative on Suncor's D&I initiatives.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-e144f5764afd", "evidence": "p10 lists three calls; p11 BMO/CPPIB, p12 Suncor, p13 Sherritt as paired precedent cases.", "position": 3, "objective": "Prove each of the three calls to action with a real-company case", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 82, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-eaa2ada5470c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "CPPIB and Suncor case studies validating the calls", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 13, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-fb94e93467c8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Three calls to action with three case studies", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "docSlug": "bc0ba3d90f68cf59", "documentTitle": "Beyond good intentions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Includes a pull-quote from the CEO of Sherritt.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-e144f5764afd", "evidence": "p10 lists three calls; p11 BMO/CPPIB, p12 Suncor, p13 Sherritt as paired precedent cases.", "position": 3, "objective": "Prove each of the three calls to action with a real-company case", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 82, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-eeddc80de078", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Sherritt program design recipe + BCG centre methodology backstop", "position": 5, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 13, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-fb94e93467c8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Three calls to action with three case studies", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "docSlug": "bc0ba3d90f68cf59", "documentTitle": "Beyond good intentions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "appendix", "function": "other", "notes": "Includes headshots of 6 team members and a stylized city illustration.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-54533de9ddf2#slide-14", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-eeddc80de078", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Sherritt program design recipe + BCG centre methodology backstop", "position": 5, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "docSlug": "2175b6c0e7a3a0e6", "documentTitle": "Changing automotive work environment: Job effects in Germany until 2030", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": "Includes logos for BCG and Agora Verkehrswende.", "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/-gTuIhtzAIVWW-ctWPnGgaOGczS8GPtR3Ip5K_tyeTs/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8yMTc1YjZjMGU3YTNhMGU2L3AwMDEuanBn", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c#slide-1", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/bP4Uxtzos7yeDjyMLRH99vst1xXfVyUORxTvI8-SswM/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8yMTc1YjZjMGU3YTNhMGU2L3AwMDEucG5n", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/jVFxVkaqFZS_27OrFKzzwUlagiZibSm7tjsIQy8Gnc0/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8yMTc1YjZjMGU3YTNhMGU2L3AwMDEuanBn", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/WzNeMb1GvPQ5YI9hZu3WsRIuMon8Zi4CdE-X8gi52fE/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8yMTc1YjZjMGU3YTNhMGU2L3AwMDEucG5n" }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "docSlug": "2175b6c0e7a3a0e6", "documentTitle": "Changing automotive work environment: Job effects in Germany until 2030", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c#slide-2", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-7c59996560d5", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Exec summary + 1.7M jobs across 8 industries", "position": 1, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "docSlug": "2175b6c0e7a3a0e6", "documentTitle": "Changing automotive work environment: Job effects in Germany until 2030", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "market_sizing", "function": "size_opportunity", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall-style layout to show the composition of the total workforce.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-a9b18b3d2f66", "evidence": "p5 is a literal waterfall by trend (+105, +20, +80, -100, -220, +205, -65 to +25k); p6 mirrors it by industry.", "position": 1, "objective": "Bridge from 1.69M jobs through trend drivers to 1.715M with industry-level shifts", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 90, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-7c59996560d5", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Exec summary + 1.7M jobs across 8 industries", "position": 1, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 5, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-92121f190323", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Job totals and net waterfall of trends", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "docSlug": "2175b6c0e7a3a0e6", "documentTitle": "Changing automotive work environment: Job effects in Germany until 2030", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-a9b18b3d2f66", "evidence": "p5 is a literal waterfall by trend (+105, +20, +80, -100, -220, +205, -65 to +25k); p6 mirrors it by industry.", "position": 1, "objective": "Bridge from 1.69M jobs through trend drivers to 1.715M with industry-level shifts", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 90, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-815faf3c6a97", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "6 trends, sum stable but shifts between industries", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 5, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-92121f190323", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Job totals and net waterfall of trends", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "docSlug": "2175b6c0e7a3a0e6", "documentTitle": "Changing automotive work environment: Job effects in Germany until 2030", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart illustrates how positive and negative trends balance out to maintain relatively stable employment figures.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-a9b18b3d2f66", "evidence": "p5 is a literal waterfall by trend (+105, +20, +80, -100, -220, +205, -65 to +25k); p6 mirrors it by industry.", "position": 1, "objective": "Bridge from 1.69M jobs through trend drivers to 1.715M with industry-level shifts", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 90, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-815faf3c6a97", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "6 trends, sum stable but shifts between industries", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 5, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-92121f190323", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Job totals and net waterfall of trends", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "docSlug": "2175b6c0e7a3a0e6", "documentTitle": "Changing automotive work environment: Job effects in Germany until 2030", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a broken axis to represent the large total employment figures (1.69M to 1.715M) while focusing on the delta of +25k jobs.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-a9b18b3d2f66", "evidence": "p5 is a literal waterfall by trend (+105, +20, +80, -100, -220, +205, -65 to +25k); p6 mirrors it by industry.", "position": 1, "objective": "Bridge from 1.69M jobs through trend drivers to 1.715M with industry-level shifts", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 90, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-815faf3c6a97", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "6 trends, sum stable but shifts between industries", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 10, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-96115207e4cd", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Shifts between industries seen via 3 lenses", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "docSlug": "2175b6c0e7a3a0e6", "documentTitle": "Changing automotive work environment: Job effects in Germany until 2030", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "transition", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 7, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-ac18081ad9d8", "evidence": "p7 explicitly enumerates 3 perspectives (time, industries/job families, regions); p8-10 deliver each.", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose the transition into three distinct, exhaustive perspectives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 88, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-858e7555440d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Transition viewed through 3 perspectives framework", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 10, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-96115207e4cd", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Shifts between industries seen via 3 lenses", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "docSlug": "2175b6c0e7a3a0e6", "documentTitle": "Changing automotive work environment: Job effects in Germany until 2030", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart shows a shift in labor composition over time, with a notable disruption in 2020-2021 attributed to government intervention.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 7, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-ac18081ad9d8", "evidence": "p7 explicitly enumerates 3 perspectives (time, industries/job families, regions); p8-10 deliver each.", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose the transition into three distinct, exhaustive perspectives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 88, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-886f3fa613ac", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Time, industry/job-family, regional data slides", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 10, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-96115207e4cd", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Shifts between industries seen via 3 lenses", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }