{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 872, "pageSize": 18, "pageCount": 17777, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a legal or investigative report (likely a Congressional or regulatory report) rather than a standard consulting deck, but it is inventoried as requested.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This page appears to be from a formal investigative report or legal document, given the heavy reliance on document reference numbers (MCK-HCOR) as footnotes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": "This page appears to be from a legal or investigative report, containing detailed footnotes referencing internal McKinsey documents.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This page appears to be an excerpt from a formal report or investigative document, containing narrative text and extensive footnotes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "The slide highlights potential conflicts of interest by showing consultants who worked for both regulatory bodies and the companies they regulated.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Contains extensive footnotes documenting specific internal McKinsey engagement lists and correspondence.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This page appears to be an excerpt from a report or legal document, containing narrative text and extensive footnotes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide highlights potential conflicts of interest by mapping concurrent consulting engagements and meetings.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a legal or investigative report (e.g., a congressional report) rather than a standard consulting deck.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, containing footnotes and narrative text.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "The slide serves as a disclosure/evidence page for a report, citing specific internal documents.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide is an embedded image within a larger document, likely a report or legal filing.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": "This page appears to be an excerpt from a legal or investigative report, containing footnotes and narrative text.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This slide is a text-heavy disclosure page from a report, likely a congressional or investigative document.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, containing narrative text and extensive footnotes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, likely an appendix or supporting evidence section.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }