{
  "kind": "all",
  "value": "all",
  "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 319975,
  "page": 759,
  "pageSize": 60,
  "pageCount": 5333,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 1,
      "slideType": "cover",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/aIkCiEAihfvVw--uWDpnoqXZM-ScsbDnxsOfmsDccEw/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8zMjY1YTAwZTNhMjFjNjYyL3AwMDEuanBn",
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/1",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-1",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 3,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-1c60c36437ff",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Cover, TOC, highlights frame the EBA exercise",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/JkDCLJpNVpLOiMOIa3tvfhE7tbUmKxHlOOH6gdBOJ4k/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8zMjY1YTAwZTNhMjFjNjYyL3AwMDEucG5n",
      "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/NGoo9yu3eNDTs44jZy5rQ0UQG_Na2a_zkUMIEXWGACg/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8zMjY1YTAwZTNhMjFjNjYyL3AwMDEuanBn",
      "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/3ApM7GqqlELs6uQgTVydB2P6Md0exKCjOGAHXYd_fQg/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8zMjY1YTAwZTNhMjFjNjYyL3AwMDEucG5n"
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 2,
      "slideType": "table_of_contents",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/2",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-2",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 3,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-1c60c36437ff",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Cover, TOC, highlights frame the EBA exercise",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 3,
      "slideType": "executive_summary",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a four-column layout with icons to categorize key findings.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/3",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-3",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 3,
          "from": 3,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-e0a2ef0bb019",
          "evidence": "Single page with 4 numbered pillars summarizing Impacts, Distribution, Country, Going Forward with takeaway bullets each.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Top-down highlights cascading from finding to action",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 3,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-1c60c36437ff",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Cover, TOC, highlights frame the EBA exercise",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 4,
      "slideType": "section_divider",
      "function": "transition",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/4",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-4",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-114a20fddded",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Section 1 'Capital Stress Test Impacts' — depletion data, bank/country rankings",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 5,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "Includes a comparison table of best/worst performers and a list of impact drivers.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/5",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-5",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-e7ddc322321b",
          "evidence": "Sequence moves big-picture history (p6) to global comparison (p7) to bank dispersion (p8-9).",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Zoom from historical depletion picture into 2023 specifics",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-114a20fddded",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Section 1 'Capital Stress Test Impacts' — depletion data, bank/country rankings",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        },
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-22238c36fe14",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Second-highest depletion in stress history flagged",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 6,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to show CET1 post-stress vs. minimum requirements over time.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/6",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-6",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-e7ddc322321b",
          "evidence": "Sequence moves big-picture history (p6) to global comparison (p7) to bank dispersion (p8-9).",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Zoom from historical depletion picture into 2023 specifics",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-114a20fddded",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Section 1 'Capital Stress Test Impacts' — depletion data, bank/country rankings",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        },
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-22238c36fe14",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Second-highest depletion in stress history flagged",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 7,
      "slideType": "comparison_table",
      "function": "compare_options",
      "notes": "The slide uses a custom 'Picasso graphing' technique to visualize the trajectory of stress test results over time.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/7",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-7",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-e7ddc322321b",
          "evidence": "Sequence moves big-picture history (p6) to global comparison (p7) to bank dispersion (p8-9).",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Zoom from historical depletion picture into 2023 specifics",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-114a20fddded",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Section 1 'Capital Stress Test Impacts' — depletion data, bank/country rankings",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        },
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-22238c36fe14",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Second-highest depletion in stress history flagged",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 8,
      "slideType": "kpi_dashboard",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The chart uses a scatter plot to categorize banks into three zones based on post-stress CET1 levels (No Buffer, Low Buffer, Ample Buffer).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/8",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-8",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-e7ddc322321b",
          "evidence": "Sequence moves big-picture history (p6) to global comparison (p7) to bank dispersion (p8-9).",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Zoom from historical depletion picture into 2023 specifics",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-114a20fddded",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Section 1 'Capital Stress Test Impacts' — depletion data, bank/country rankings",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        },
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-22238c36fe14",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Second-highest depletion in stress history flagged",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 9,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The table includes country, bank name, fully loaded depletion metrics, and quarter indicators for both 2023 and 2021 stress tests.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/9",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-9",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-e7ddc322321b",
          "evidence": "Sequence moves big-picture history (p6) to global comparison (p7) to bank dispersion (p8-9).",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Zoom from historical depletion picture into 2023 specifics",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-114a20fddded",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Section 1 'Capital Stress Test Impacts' — depletion data, bank/country rankings",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 10,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The table includes a visual bar chart representation of depletion levels for each bank.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/10",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-10",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-e930910299e1",
          "evidence": "Bank ranking (p10-11), country ranking (p12), credit-risk asset class ranking (p13).",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Split aggregate depletion across banks, countries and asset classes",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-114a20fddded",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Section 1 'Capital Stress Test Impacts' — depletion data, bank/country rankings",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 11,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide uses a horizontal bar chart embedded within the table rows to visualize the 'Fully Loaded' depletion impact.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/11",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-11",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-e930910299e1",
          "evidence": "Bank ranking (p10-11), country ranking (p12), credit-risk asset class ranking (p13).",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Split aggregate depletion across banks, countries and asset classes",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-114a20fddded",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Section 1 'Capital Stress Test Impacts' — depletion data, bank/country rankings",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 12,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The table compares 2023 and 2021 stress test results across European countries, including G-SIB and EU weighted averages.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/12",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-12",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-e930910299e1",
          "evidence": "Bank ranking (p10-11), country ranking (p12), credit-risk asset class ranking (p13).",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Split aggregate depletion across banks, countries and asset classes",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-114a20fddded",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Section 1 'Capital Stress Test Impacts' — depletion data, bank/country rankings",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 13,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The table provides a granular breakdown of stress test impacts by asset class, including stage-specific metrics.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/13",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-13",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-e930910299e1",
          "evidence": "Bank ranking (p10-11), country ranking (p12), credit-risk asset class ranking (p13).",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Split aggregate depletion across banks, countries and asset classes",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-114a20fddded",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Section 1 'Capital Stress Test Impacts' — depletion data, bank/country rankings",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 14,
      "slideType": "section_divider",
      "function": "transition",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/14",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-14",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-159d0e86ada5",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Section 2 maps stress results to dividend/buyback potential via P2G",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 15,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The chart illustrates capital flexibility across European banks based on 2023 EBA Stress Test results.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/15",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-15",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "2x2 Matrix",
          "slug": "30-2x2-matrix",
          "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-ed7c8cf4d6c5",
          "evidence": "Builds from threshold (p15) to P2G method (p16) to bank-level tables (p17-19) to a labelled 2x2 with four quadrants (p20).",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Position banks on Capital Flexibility vs P2G to surface dividend winners/losers",
          "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-159d0e86ada5",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Section 2 maps stress results to dividend/buyback potential via P2G",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        },
        {
          "to": 16,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-2763077973fd",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "P2G two-step methodology presented",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 16,
      "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide details the methodology for P2G calculation based on EBA Stress Test results.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/16",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-16",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "2x2 Matrix",
          "slug": "30-2x2-matrix",
          "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-ed7c8cf4d6c5",
          "evidence": "Builds from threshold (p15) to P2G method (p16) to bank-level tables (p17-19) to a labelled 2x2 with four quadrants (p20).",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Position banks on Capital Flexibility vs P2G to surface dividend winners/losers",
          "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-159d0e86ada5",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Section 2 maps stress results to dividend/buyback potential via P2G",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        },
        {
          "to": 16,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-2763077973fd",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "P2G two-step methodology presented",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 17,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The table includes columns for Maximum CET1 Depletion, P2G (Bps), P2G Bucket, CET 1 (%), Total Capital Requirement (%), Excess Capital (%), and Quartile.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/17",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-17",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "2x2 Matrix",
          "slug": "30-2x2-matrix",
          "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-ed7c8cf4d6c5",
          "evidence": "Builds from threshold (p15) to P2G method (p16) to bank-level tables (p17-19) to a labelled 2x2 with four quadrants (p20).",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Position banks on Capital Flexibility vs P2G to surface dividend winners/losers",
          "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-159d0e86ada5",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Section 2 maps stress results to dividend/buyback potential via P2G",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        },
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 17,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-292af5ecc95c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Bank-by-bank P2G winners/losers tables and 2x2",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 18,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The table highlights the impact of EBA stress test results on capital distribution potential.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/18",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-18",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "2x2 Matrix",
          "slug": "30-2x2-matrix",
          "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-ed7c8cf4d6c5",
          "evidence": "Builds from threshold (p15) to P2G method (p16) to bank-level tables (p17-19) to a labelled 2x2 with four quadrants (p20).",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Position banks on Capital Flexibility vs P2G to surface dividend winners/losers",
          "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-159d0e86ada5",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Section 2 maps stress results to dividend/buyback potential via P2G",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        },
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 17,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-292af5ecc95c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Bank-by-bank P2G winners/losers tables and 2x2",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 19,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The table displays Maximum CET1 Depletion, P2G (Bps), P2G Bucket, CET 1 (%), Total Capital Requirement (%), Excess Capital (%), and Quarter for 18 banks.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/19",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-19",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "2x2 Matrix",
          "slug": "30-2x2-matrix",
          "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-ed7c8cf4d6c5",
          "evidence": "Builds from threshold (p15) to P2G method (p16) to bank-level tables (p17-19) to a labelled 2x2 with four quadrants (p20).",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Position banks on Capital Flexibility vs P2G to surface dividend winners/losers",
          "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-159d0e86ada5",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Section 2 maps stress results to dividend/buyback potential via P2G",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        },
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 17,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-292af5ecc95c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Bank-by-bank P2G winners/losers tables and 2x2",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 20,
      "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": "The chart uses a 2x2 matrix structure to categorize banks based on median values of P2G and Excess Capital.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/20",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-20",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "2x2 Matrix",
          "slug": "30-2x2-matrix",
          "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-ed7c8cf4d6c5",
          "evidence": "Builds from threshold (p15) to P2G method (p16) to bank-level tables (p17-19) to a labelled 2x2 with four quadrants (p20).",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Position banks on Capital Flexibility vs P2G to surface dividend winners/losers",
          "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-159d0e86ada5",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Section 2 maps stress results to dividend/buyback potential via P2G",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        },
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 17,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-292af5ecc95c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Bank-by-bank P2G winners/losers tables and 2x2",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 21,
      "slideType": "section_divider",
      "function": "transition",
      "notes": "The slide uses a background image of a keyboard and financial charts, typical of Alvarez & Marsal section dividers.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/21",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-21",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 21,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-18bf5a50e472",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Section 3 'What to expect going forward?' — Climate, Cyber, 2025 EBA",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 22,
      "slideType": "roadmap",
      "function": "plan_implementation",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/22",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-22",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 22,
          "name": "Three Horizons",
          "slug": "49-three-horizons",
          "bestFor": "Innovation strategy, long-term planning, board presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-f2356ccf144a",
          "evidence": "p22 splits future into 2024 Climate, 2024 Cyber, 2025 EBA/ECB; p23-25 expand each.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Lay out three forward-looking exercises across 2024-2025",
          "structure": "Horizon 1 (Core Business) -> Horizon 2 (Emerging Opportunities) -> Horizon 3 (Future Bets) -> Balanced Portfolio",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Structure initiatives across time horizons: protect core, grow adjacencies, create futures"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 21,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-18bf5a50e472",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Section 3 'What to expect going forward?' — Climate, Cyber, 2025 EBA",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 22,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-2f44158c6300",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "Roadmap of 2024 Climate, 2024 Cyber, 2025 EBA exercises",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 23,
      "slideType": "situation_overview",
      "function": "establish_context",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/23",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-23",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 22,
          "name": "Three Horizons",
          "slug": "49-three-horizons",
          "bestFor": "Innovation strategy, long-term planning, board presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-f2356ccf144a",
          "evidence": "p22 splits future into 2024 Climate, 2024 Cyber, 2025 EBA/ECB; p23-25 expand each.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Lay out three forward-looking exercises across 2024-2025",
          "structure": "Horizon 1 (Core Business) -> Horizon 2 (Emerging Opportunities) -> Horizon 3 (Future Bets) -> Balanced Portfolio",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Structure initiatives across time horizons: protect core, grow adjacencies, create futures"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 21,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-18bf5a50e472",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Section 3 'What to expect going forward?' — Climate, Cyber, 2025 EBA",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 22,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-2f44158c6300",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "Roadmap of 2024 Climate, 2024 Cyber, 2025 EBA exercises",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 24,
      "slideType": "situation_overview",
      "function": "establish_context",
      "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to outline the key parameters of the regulatory stress test.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/24",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-24",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 22,
          "name": "Three Horizons",
          "slug": "49-three-horizons",
          "bestFor": "Innovation strategy, long-term planning, board presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-f2356ccf144a",
          "evidence": "p22 splits future into 2024 Climate, 2024 Cyber, 2025 EBA/ECB; p23-25 expand each.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Lay out three forward-looking exercises across 2024-2025",
          "structure": "Horizon 1 (Core Business) -> Horizon 2 (Emerging Opportunities) -> Horizon 3 (Future Bets) -> Balanced Portfolio",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Structure initiatives across time horizons: protect core, grow adjacencies, create futures"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 21,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-18bf5a50e472",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Section 3 'What to expect going forward?' — Climate, Cyber, 2025 EBA",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 22,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-2f44158c6300",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "Roadmap of 2024 Climate, 2024 Cyber, 2025 EBA exercises",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 25,
      "slideType": "roadmap",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a sequential process flow with icons representing each stage.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/25",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-25",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 22,
          "name": "Three Horizons",
          "slug": "49-three-horizons",
          "bestFor": "Innovation strategy, long-term planning, board presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-f2356ccf144a",
          "evidence": "p22 splits future into 2024 Climate, 2024 Cyber, 2025 EBA/ECB; p23-25 expand each.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Lay out three forward-looking exercises across 2024-2025",
          "structure": "Horizon 1 (Core Business) -> Horizon 2 (Emerging Opportunities) -> Horizon 3 (Future Bets) -> Balanced Portfolio",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Structure initiatives across time horizons: protect core, grow adjacencies, create futures"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 21,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-18bf5a50e472",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Section 3 'What to expect going forward?' — Climate, Cyber, 2025 EBA",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 22,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-2f44158c6300",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "Roadmap of 2024 Climate, 2024 Cyber, 2025 EBA exercises",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 26,
      "slideType": "section_divider",
      "function": "transition",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/26",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-26",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 27,
      "slideType": "scenario_analysis",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The table includes sparkline-style bar charts to visualize the difference in basis points between the two stress test years.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/27",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-27",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 28,
      "slideType": "scenario_analysis",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide compares ST 2023 vs ST 2021 scenarios for UK and US, showing net shocks and differences in basis points (bps) or percentage points (pp).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/28",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-28",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 29,
      "slideType": "appendix",
      "function": "appendix",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/29",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-29",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 30,
      "slideType": "appendix_data",
      "function": "appendix",
      "notes": "The slide serves as a reference list for the entities analyzed in the stress test report.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/30",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-30",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 31,
      "slideType": "appendix",
      "function": "appendix",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/31",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-31",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 32,
      "slideType": "team_bio",
      "function": "other",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/32",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-32",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
      "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 33,
      "slideType": "disclaimer",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/33",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-33",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "docSlug": "80328e1a1097a9f7",
      "documentTitle": "apr12jlovelock 840572",
      "authorId": "Gartner",
      "authorName": "Gartner",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 12,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "Includes a 'We are here' marker indicating the current timeframe.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872/12",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872#slide-12",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Logic Chain",
          "slug": "01-logic-chain",
          "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
          "matchId": "8d4030b0-4539-42d7-b9bd-1e01c0d5dba0",
          "evidence": "Data-driven analysis and market insights",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Understand IT spending trends and forecast",
          "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "6ee85288-84a1-4b12-87d2-37d1744fa7b0",
          "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
          "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
          "beatName": "Satisfaction",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction",
          "evidence": "Detailed market analysis and data",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "docSlug": "80328e1a1097a9f7",
      "documentTitle": "apr12jlovelock 840572",
      "authorId": "Gartner",
      "authorName": "Gartner",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 13,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "Prices are normalized to 2020 levels (100%).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872/13",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872#slide-13",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Logic Chain",
          "slug": "01-logic-chain",
          "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
          "matchId": "8d4030b0-4539-42d7-b9bd-1e01c0d5dba0",
          "evidence": "Data-driven analysis and market insights",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Understand IT spending trends and forecast",
          "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "6ee85288-84a1-4b12-87d2-37d1744fa7b0",
          "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
          "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
          "beatName": "Satisfaction",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction",
          "evidence": "Detailed market analysis and data",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "docSlug": "80328e1a1097a9f7",
      "documentTitle": "apr12jlovelock 840572",
      "authorId": "Gartner",
      "authorName": "Gartner",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 14,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide uses two line charts to visualize price index changes relative to a 2020 baseline.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872/14",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872#slide-14",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Logic Chain",
          "slug": "01-logic-chain",
          "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
          "matchId": "8d4030b0-4539-42d7-b9bd-1e01c0d5dba0",
          "evidence": "Data-driven analysis and market insights",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Understand IT spending trends and forecast",
          "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "6ee85288-84a1-4b12-87d2-37d1744fa7b0",
          "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
          "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
          "beatName": "Satisfaction",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction",
          "evidence": "Detailed market analysis and data",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "docSlug": "80328e1a1097a9f7",
      "documentTitle": "apr12jlovelock 840572",
      "authorId": "Gartner",
      "authorName": "Gartner",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 15,
      "slideType": "pain_points",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide highlights that CIOs face a broad range of persistent problems, with talent being the primary concern.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872/15",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872#slide-15",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Logic Chain",
          "slug": "01-logic-chain",
          "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
          "matchId": "8d4030b0-4539-42d7-b9bd-1e01c0d5dba0",
          "evidence": "Data-driven analysis and market insights",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Understand IT spending trends and forecast",
          "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
        },
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "4c75d119-7428-4435-8c03-ee0d84f60c19",
          "evidence": "Talent is now the overwhelming #1 pain point",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Highlight impact of talent shortage on IT spending",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "6ee85288-84a1-4b12-87d2-37d1744fa7b0",
          "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
          "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
          "beatName": "Satisfaction",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction",
          "evidence": "Detailed market analysis and data",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "docSlug": "80328e1a1097a9f7",
      "documentTitle": "apr12jlovelock 840572",
      "authorId": "Gartner",
      "authorName": "Gartner",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 16,
      "slideType": "market_landscape",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The right chart is a sunburst/pie variant showing market concentration.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872/16",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872#slide-16",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Logic Chain",
          "slug": "01-logic-chain",
          "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
          "matchId": "8d4030b0-4539-42d7-b9bd-1e01c0d5dba0",
          "evidence": "Data-driven analysis and market insights",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Understand IT spending trends and forecast",
          "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
        },
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "4c75d119-7428-4435-8c03-ee0d84f60c19",
          "evidence": "Talent is now the overwhelming #1 pain point",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Highlight impact of talent shortage on IT spending",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "6ee85288-84a1-4b12-87d2-37d1744fa7b0",
          "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
          "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
          "beatName": "Satisfaction",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction",
          "evidence": "Detailed market analysis and data",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "docSlug": "80328e1a1097a9f7",
      "documentTitle": "apr12jlovelock 840572",
      "authorId": "Gartner",
      "authorName": "Gartner",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 17,
      "slideType": "market_landscape",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The pie chart is a non-standard visualization (a 'sunburst' or 'radial' style) representing market share.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872/17",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872#slide-17",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Logic Chain",
          "slug": "01-logic-chain",
          "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
          "matchId": "8d4030b0-4539-42d7-b9bd-1e01c0d5dba0",
          "evidence": "Data-driven analysis and market insights",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Understand IT spending trends and forecast",
          "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
        },
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "4c75d119-7428-4435-8c03-ee0d84f60c19",
          "evidence": "Talent is now the overwhelming #1 pain point",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Highlight impact of talent shortage on IT spending",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "6ee85288-84a1-4b12-87d2-37d1744fa7b0",
          "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
          "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
          "beatName": "Satisfaction",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction",
          "evidence": "Detailed market analysis and data",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "docSlug": "80328e1a1097a9f7",
      "documentTitle": "apr12jlovelock 840572",
      "authorId": "Gartner",
      "authorName": "Gartner",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 18,
      "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": "The chart uses circles to group countries into three distinct clusters based on IT spending and value-added metrics.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872/18",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872#slide-18",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Logic Chain",
          "slug": "01-logic-chain",
          "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
          "matchId": "8d4030b0-4539-42d7-b9bd-1e01c0d5dba0",
          "evidence": "Data-driven analysis and market insights",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Understand IT spending trends and forecast",
          "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
        },
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "4c75d119-7428-4435-8c03-ee0d84f60c19",
          "evidence": "Talent is now the overwhelming #1 pain point",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Highlight impact of talent shortage on IT spending",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "6ee85288-84a1-4b12-87d2-37d1744fa7b0",
          "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
          "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
          "beatName": "Satisfaction",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction",
          "evidence": "Detailed market analysis and data",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "docSlug": "80328e1a1097a9f7",
      "documentTitle": "apr12jlovelock 840572",
      "authorId": "Gartner",
      "authorName": "Gartner",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 19,
      "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": "The chart uses colored circles to segment countries into three distinct clusters based on their IT spending and value-added metrics, with the United States as an outlier.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872/19",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872#slide-19",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Logic Chain",
          "slug": "01-logic-chain",
          "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
          "matchId": "8d4030b0-4539-42d7-b9bd-1e01c0d5dba0",
          "evidence": "Data-driven analysis and market insights",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Understand IT spending trends and forecast",
          "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
        },
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "4c75d119-7428-4435-8c03-ee0d84f60c19",
          "evidence": "Talent is now the overwhelming #1 pain point",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Highlight impact of talent shortage on IT spending",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "6ee85288-84a1-4b12-87d2-37d1744fa7b0",
          "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
          "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
          "beatName": "Satisfaction",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction",
          "evidence": "Detailed market analysis and data",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "docSlug": "80328e1a1097a9f7",
      "documentTitle": "apr12jlovelock 840572",
      "authorId": "Gartner",
      "authorName": "Gartner",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 20,
      "slideType": "market_landscape",
      "function": "size_opportunity",
      "notes": "The chart uses bubble size to represent market volume or relative importance, with color-coding for 'Run', 'Build', and 'Design' service categories.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872/20",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872#slide-20",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Logic Chain",
          "slug": "01-logic-chain",
          "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
          "matchId": "8d4030b0-4539-42d7-b9bd-1e01c0d5dba0",
          "evidence": "Data-driven analysis and market insights",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Understand IT spending trends and forecast",
          "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
        },
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "4c75d119-7428-4435-8c03-ee0d84f60c19",
          "evidence": "Talent is now the overwhelming #1 pain point",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Highlight impact of talent shortage on IT spending",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "6ee85288-84a1-4b12-87d2-37d1744fa7b0",
          "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
          "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
          "beatName": "Satisfaction",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction",
          "evidence": "Detailed market analysis and data",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "docSlug": "80328e1a1097a9f7",
      "documentTitle": "apr12jlovelock 840572",
      "authorId": "Gartner",
      "authorName": "Gartner",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 21,
      "slideType": "market_landscape",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The chart uses bubble size to represent market segments, with color-coding for service phases (Design, Build, Run).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872/21",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872#slide-21",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Logic Chain",
          "slug": "01-logic-chain",
          "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
          "matchId": "8d4030b0-4539-42d7-b9bd-1e01c0d5dba0",
          "evidence": "Data-driven analysis and market insights",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Understand IT spending trends and forecast",
          "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
        },
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "4c75d119-7428-4435-8c03-ee0d84f60c19",
          "evidence": "Talent is now the overwhelming #1 pain point",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Highlight impact of talent shortage on IT spending",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "6ee85288-84a1-4b12-87d2-37d1744fa7b0",
          "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
          "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
          "beatName": "Satisfaction",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction",
          "evidence": "Detailed market analysis and data",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "docSlug": "80328e1a1097a9f7",
      "documentTitle": "apr12jlovelock 840572",
      "authorId": "Gartner",
      "authorName": "Gartner",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 22,
      "slideType": "market_landscape",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The chart uses bubble size to represent market scale or spending volume. Categories are color-coded by strategy.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872/22",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872#slide-22",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Logic Chain",
          "slug": "01-logic-chain",
          "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
          "matchId": "8d4030b0-4539-42d7-b9bd-1e01c0d5dba0",
          "evidence": "Data-driven analysis and market insights",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Understand IT spending trends and forecast",
          "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
        },
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "4c75d119-7428-4435-8c03-ee0d84f60c19",
          "evidence": "Talent is now the overwhelming #1 pain point",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Highlight impact of talent shortage on IT spending",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "6ee85288-84a1-4b12-87d2-37d1744fa7b0",
          "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
          "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
          "beatName": "Satisfaction",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction",
          "evidence": "Detailed market analysis and data",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "docSlug": "80328e1a1097a9f7",
      "documentTitle": "apr12jlovelock 840572",
      "authorId": "Gartner",
      "authorName": "Gartner",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 23,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "Source: Gartner Market Databook, 3Q21 Update, July 2021",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872/23",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872#slide-23",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Logic Chain",
          "slug": "01-logic-chain",
          "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
          "matchId": "8d4030b0-4539-42d7-b9bd-1e01c0d5dba0",
          "evidence": "Data-driven analysis and market insights",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Understand IT spending trends and forecast",
          "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
        },
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 15,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "4c75d119-7428-4435-8c03-ee0d84f60c19",
          "evidence": "Talent is now the overwhelming #1 pain point",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Highlight impact of talent shortage on IT spending",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "6ee85288-84a1-4b12-87d2-37d1744fa7b0",
          "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
          "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
          "beatName": "Satisfaction",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction",
          "evidence": "Detailed market analysis and data",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "docSlug": "80328e1a1097a9f7",
      "documentTitle": "apr12jlovelock 840572",
      "authorId": "Gartner",
      "authorName": "Gartner",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 24,
      "slideType": "other",
      "function": "other",
      "notes": "This slide serves as a functional instruction or UI demonstration for the audience.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872/24",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872#slide-24",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 27,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "83afc93a-b29b-4235-91e2-526566a1d074",
          "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
          "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
          "beatName": "Action",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-action",
          "evidence": "Call to action and next steps",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "docSlug": "80328e1a1097a9f7",
      "documentTitle": "apr12jlovelock 840572",
      "authorId": "Gartner",
      "authorName": "Gartner",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 25,
      "slideType": "other",
      "function": "other",
      "notes": "The slide contains a screenshot of a Gartner web page and a URL link.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872/25",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872#slide-25",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 27,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "83afc93a-b29b-4235-91e2-526566a1d074",
          "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
          "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
          "beatName": "Action",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-action",
          "evidence": "Call to action and next steps",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "docSlug": "80328e1a1097a9f7",
      "documentTitle": "apr12jlovelock 840572",
      "authorId": "Gartner",
      "authorName": "Gartner",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 26,
      "slideType": "closing_ask",
      "function": "state_next_steps",
      "notes": "Includes a visual mockup of a LinkedIn page and social media handles.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872/26",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872#slide-26",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 27,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "83afc93a-b29b-4235-91e2-526566a1d074",
          "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
          "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
          "beatName": "Action",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-action",
          "evidence": "Call to action and next steps",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "docSlug": "80328e1a1097a9f7",
      "documentTitle": "apr12jlovelock 840572",
      "authorId": "Gartner",
      "authorName": "Gartner",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 27,
      "slideType": "next_steps",
      "function": "state_next_steps",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872/27",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-90204b6c9872#slide-27",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 27,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "83afc93a-b29b-4235-91e2-526566a1d074",
          "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
          "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
          "beatName": "Action",
          "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-action",
          "evidence": "Call to action and next steps",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "docSlug": "47b4243419de0c46",
      "documentTitle": "The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?",
      "authorId": "Kearney",
      "authorName": "ATKearney",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.678,
      "pageNumber": 1,
      "slideType": "cover",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": "Features a dramatic image of a hammer smashing a keyboard to symbolize disruption.",
      "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/yXH8nyNjBqFjrNPxRir4Nzv-nYHDdNbjNBiNxv7eK00/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy80N2I0MjQzNDE5ZGUwYzQ2L3AwMDEuanBn",
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936/1",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936#slide-1",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/NiQVwdri4iWe2BXoXhbPXBsWfaugGUQqbbZO0imOQAE/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy80N2I0MjQzNDE5ZGUwYzQ2L3AwMDEucG5n",
      "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/Z5iyYsn5d7DH4BlM7wfXbA587PaimP4FTPAEXRCcYTc/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy80N2I0MjQzNDE5ZGUwYzQ2L3AwMDEuanBn",
      "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/L0g068UoJbFPj6x9KMNFuBxdb2K2fnT3DNRQD5nrono/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy80N2I0MjQzNDE5ZGUwYzQ2L3AwMDEucG5n"
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "docSlug": "47b4243419de0c46",
      "documentTitle": "The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?",
      "authorId": "Kearney",
      "authorName": "ATKearney",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.678,
      "pageNumber": 2,
      "slideType": "problem_statement",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": "The slide serves as an introductory problem statement for a consulting deck on procurement technology.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936/2",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936#slide-2",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 2,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "21b9706f-e1ab-4255-97c2-fb1c2c3064db",
          "evidence": "The problem statement and strategic options suggest a cost of inaction loop",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "What are the costs of not improving procurement technology?",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 2,
          "from": 2,
          "beatId": "6b10f860-9c36-49cd-88fa-6e1d2957f64d",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Problem",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain",
          "evidence": "The problem statement on page 2",
          "position": 0,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "docSlug": "47b4243419de0c46",
      "documentTitle": "The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?",
      "authorId": "Kearney",
      "authorName": "ATKearney",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.678,
      "pageNumber": 3,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "establish_context",
      "notes": "Contains two figures: a process map of procurement functions and a timeline of M&A activity in the procurement tech space.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936/3",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936#slide-3",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 2,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "21b9706f-e1ab-4255-97c2-fb1c2c3064db",
          "evidence": "The problem statement and strategic options suggest a cost of inaction loop",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "What are the costs of not improving procurement technology?",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 3,
          "from": 3,
          "beatId": "50669cb6-f687-462d-afeb-ba29467d4c1b",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Agitate",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
          "evidence": "The industry trends on page 3",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "docSlug": "47b4243419de0c46",
      "documentTitle": "The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?",
      "authorId": "Kearney",
      "authorName": "ATKearney",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.678,
      "pageNumber": 4,
      "slideType": "thesis_headline",
      "function": "establish_context",
      "notes": "The slide uses a narrative structure to critique the current state of procurement software and advocate for a user-centric 'north star' approach.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936/4",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936#slide-4",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 2,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "21b9706f-e1ab-4255-97c2-fb1c2c3064db",
          "evidence": "The problem statement and strategic options suggest a cost of inaction loop",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "What are the costs of not improving procurement technology?",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        },
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 4,
          "name": "Jobs To Be Done",
          "slug": "53-jobs-to-be-done",
          "bestFor": "Product innovation, market entry, competitive positioning",
          "matchId": "6e83893c-cf11-4759-a192-4204bfb91e22",
          "evidence": "The thesis headline and market landscape suggest a jobs-to-be-done loop",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "What are the requirements for procurement technology?",
          "structure": "The Customer's Job -> Current Solutions (Hired/Fired) -> Unmet Needs -> Our Solution Fit",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Reframe the problem around what the customer is trying to accomplish, not what they're buying"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "docSlug": "47b4243419de0c46",
      "documentTitle": "The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?",
      "authorId": "Kearney",
      "authorName": "ATKearney",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.678,
      "pageNumber": 5,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide includes a table titled 'Figure 3: Selected start-ups to watch'.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936/5",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936#slide-5",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 2,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "21b9706f-e1ab-4255-97c2-fb1c2c3064db",
          "evidence": "The problem statement and strategic options suggest a cost of inaction loop",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "What are the costs of not improving procurement technology?",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        },
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 4,
          "name": "Jobs To Be Done",
          "slug": "53-jobs-to-be-done",
          "bestFor": "Product innovation, market entry, competitive positioning",
          "matchId": "6e83893c-cf11-4759-a192-4204bfb91e22",
          "evidence": "The thesis headline and market landscape suggest a jobs-to-be-done loop",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "What are the requirements for procurement technology?",
          "structure": "The Customer's Job -> Current Solutions (Hired/Fired) -> Unmet Needs -> Our Solution Fit",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Reframe the problem around what the customer is trying to accomplish, not what they're buying"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "docSlug": "47b4243419de0c46",
      "documentTitle": "The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?",
      "authorId": "Kearney",
      "authorName": "ATKearney",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.678,
      "pageNumber": 6,
      "slideType": "market_landscape",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The diagram illustrates a hub-and-spoke model where various specialized procurement software vendors connect to a central AI hub.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936/6",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936#slide-6",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 2,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "21b9706f-e1ab-4255-97c2-fb1c2c3064db",
          "evidence": "The problem statement and strategic options suggest a cost of inaction loop",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "What are the costs of not improving procurement technology?",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        },
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 4,
          "name": "Jobs To Be Done",
          "slug": "53-jobs-to-be-done",
          "bestFor": "Product innovation, market entry, competitive positioning",
          "matchId": "6e83893c-cf11-4759-a192-4204bfb91e22",
          "evidence": "The thesis headline and market landscape suggest a jobs-to-be-done loop",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "What are the requirements for procurement technology?",
          "structure": "The Customer's Job -> Current Solutions (Hired/Fired) -> Unmet Needs -> Our Solution Fit",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Reframe the problem around what the customer is trying to accomplish, not what they're buying"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "docSlug": "47b4243419de0c46",
      "documentTitle": "The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?",
      "authorId": "Kearney",
      "authorName": "ATKearney",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.678,
      "pageNumber": 7,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "illustrate_case",
      "notes": "The slide includes a conversational flow diagram (Figure 5) demonstrating an AI chatbot interacting with a user regarding invoice status and compliance.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936/7",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936#slide-7",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 2,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "21b9706f-e1ab-4255-97c2-fb1c2c3064db",
          "evidence": "The problem statement and strategic options suggest a cost of inaction loop",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "What are the costs of not improving procurement technology?",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "docSlug": "47b4243419de0c46",
      "documentTitle": "The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?",
      "authorId": "Kearney",
      "authorName": "ATKearney",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.678,
      "pageNumber": 8,
      "slideType": "strategic_options",
      "function": "compare_options",
      "notes": "The slide presents a comparison matrix of three procurement technology adoption strategies, detailing benefits and trade-offs for each.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936/8",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936#slide-8",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 2,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "21b9706f-e1ab-4255-97c2-fb1c2c3064db",
          "evidence": "The problem statement and strategic options suggest a cost of inaction loop",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "What are the costs of not improving procurement technology?",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 8,
          "beatId": "5e562a95-76b0-4445-849e-9a7ef69b722b",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Solution",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief",
          "evidence": "The strategic options on page 8",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "docSlug": "47b4243419de0c46",
      "documentTitle": "The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?",
      "authorId": "Kearney",
      "authorName": "ATKearney",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.678,
      "pageNumber": 9,
      "slideType": "appendix",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "This appears to be the final page of a white paper or report.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936/9",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936#slide-9",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "docSlug": "47b4243419de0c46",
      "documentTitle": "The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?",
      "authorId": "Kearney",
      "authorName": "ATKearney",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.678,
      "pageNumber": 10,
      "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": "This is a standard corporate boilerplate slide often found at the end of consulting decks.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936/10",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936#slide-10",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-9c4e3f2eca1c",
      "docSlug": "ed563b135cfdf32b",
      "documentTitle": "Wilton Park Policy Brief 17102024",
      "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
      "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 1,
      "slideType": "cover",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": "Includes logos for Alvarez & Marsal, RBC BlueBay Asset Management, and White & Case.",
      "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/FtlvpKwZnE5BTGjC8ZVuAIXhNu-jwsWXqXuAmbQj-qk/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9lZDU2M2IxMzVjZmRmMzJiL3AwMDEuanBn",
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-9c4e3f2eca1c/1",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-9c4e3f2eca1c",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-9c4e3f2eca1c#slide-1",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/_gIDbzZ2cwHOYgEPJEZMRUlcT5qw6xwnNJY5zug6X3M/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9lZDU2M2IxMzVjZmRmMzJiL3AwMDEucG5n",
      "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/UHCNF5wg4rM7hecCjF0IhUg8-tCdaXfyfPCPfIa9Dys/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9lZDU2M2IxMzVjZmRmMzJiL3AwMDEuanBn",
      "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/uS4Fj4kjfHPLCW6RKCYJMK94tQoihNVsdO8dD7U7fX0/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9lZDU2M2IxMzVjZmRmMzJiL3AwMDEucG5n"
    }
  ]
}