{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 73, "pageSize": 60, "pageCount": 5333, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 107, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 8, EF 24, EF 30) and their overlaps with other operational areas or administrative processes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/107", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-107", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 106, "name": "Sensitivity Test", "slug": "52-sensitivity-test", "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-2974563388cb", "evidence": "Eight-page 'Beskrivelse af overlap' section quantifying overlap (-22, -49, -3) and overhead-rate sensitivity.", "position": 18, "objective": "Stress-test gross savings for inter-initiative overlap", "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.", "position": 4, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 108, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table shows specific overlaps between efficiency initiatives, noting that some have zero impact while others show negative values (savings/reductions).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/108", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-108", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 106, "name": "Sensitivity Test", "slug": "52-sensitivity-test", "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-2974563388cb", "evidence": "Eight-page 'Beskrivelse af overlap' section quantifying overlap (-22, -49, -3) and overhead-rate sensitivity.", "position": 18, "objective": "Stress-test gross savings for inter-initiative overlap", "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.", "position": 4, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 109, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 14, 17, 18, 21, 23, 24) and their interdependencies.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/109", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-109", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 106, "name": "Sensitivity Test", "slug": "52-sensitivity-test", "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-2974563388cb", "evidence": "Eight-page 'Beskrivelse af overlap' section quantifying overlap (-22, -49, -3) and overhead-rate sensitivity.", "position": 18, "objective": "Stress-test gross savings for inter-initiative overlap", "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.", "position": 4, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 110, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table shows zero values for all years, indicating no financial overlap identified for these specific proposals.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/110", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-110", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 106, "name": "Sensitivity Test", "slug": "52-sensitivity-test", "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-2974563388cb", "evidence": "Eight-page 'Beskrivelse af overlap' section quantifying overlap (-22, -49, -3) and overhead-rate sensitivity.", "position": 18, "objective": "Stress-test gross savings for inter-initiative overlap", "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.", "position": 4, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 111, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table shows negative values representing the overlap (deduction) between efficiency initiatives.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/111", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-111", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 106, "name": "Sensitivity Test", "slug": "52-sensitivity-test", "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-2974563388cb", "evidence": "Eight-page 'Beskrivelse af overlap' section quantifying overlap (-22, -49, -3) and overhead-rate sensitivity.", "position": 18, "objective": "Stress-test gross savings for inter-initiative overlap", "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.", "position": 4, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 112, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 32, 35, 36, 40, 41, 42) and their interdependencies.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/112", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-112", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 106, "name": "Sensitivity Test", "slug": "52-sensitivity-test", "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-2974563388cb", "evidence": "Eight-page 'Beskrivelse af overlap' section quantifying overlap (-22, -49, -3) and overhead-rate sensitivity.", "position": 18, "objective": "Stress-test gross savings for inter-initiative overlap", "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.", "position": 4, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 113, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table shows negative values, indicating cost reductions or savings associated with the identified overlaps.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/113", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-113", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 106, "name": "Sensitivity Test", "slug": "52-sensitivity-test", "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-2974563388cb", "evidence": "Eight-page 'Beskrivelse af overlap' section quantifying overlap (-22, -49, -3) and overhead-rate sensitivity.", "position": 18, "objective": "Stress-test gross savings for inter-initiative overlap", "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.", "position": 4, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 114, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table outlines two specific efficiency proposal overlaps (EF 45 and general overhead reductions).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/114", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-114", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 106, "name": "Sensitivity Test", "slug": "52-sensitivity-test", "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-2974563388cb", "evidence": "Eight-page 'Beskrivelse af overlap' section quantifying overlap (-22, -49, -3) and overhead-rate sensitivity.", "position": 18, "objective": "Stress-test gross savings for inter-initiative overlap", "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.", "position": 4, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 115, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The table outlines four specific initiatives (Logistics, Structure/Concepts, Materiel/IT, and Cross-functional) and their financial impact.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/115", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-115", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 106, "name": "Sensitivity Test", "slug": "52-sensitivity-test", "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-2974563388cb", "evidence": "Eight-page 'Beskrivelse af overlap' section quantifying overlap (-22, -49, -3) and overhead-rate sensitivity.", "position": 18, "objective": "Stress-test gross savings for inter-initiative overlap", "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.", "position": 4, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 116, "slideType": "table_of_contents", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/116", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-116", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 117, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide outlines financial potential (855-1.135M DKK), implementation timeline (2018-2022), FTE reductions (684-931), and overhead/turnover assumptions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/117", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-117", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 121, "from": 117, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-2f2bcf0b262e", "evidence": "Total potential, investment bars 68-296 mio. kr., year-by-year indfasning, alternative pace.", "position": 19, "objective": "Reconcile gross to net 855-1.135 mio. kr. and show investments", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 118, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The table includes a specific highlight (green oval) around the 2022 total net potential of 855-1135 million DKK.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/118", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-118", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 121, "from": 117, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-2f2bcf0b262e", "evidence": "Total potential, investment bars 68-296 mio. kr., year-by-year indfasning, alternative pace.", "position": 19, "objective": "Reconcile gross to net 855-1.135 mio. kr. and show investments", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 119, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-like structure to present quantitative data across time and categories.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/119", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-119", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 121, "from": 117, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-2f2bcf0b262e", "evidence": "Total potential, investment bars 68-296 mio. kr., year-by-year indfasning, alternative pace.", "position": 19, "objective": "Reconcile gross to net 855-1.135 mio. kr. and show investments", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 120, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide compares current assumptions against future decision points regarding personnel turnover and resource allocation within the Danish Defense.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/120", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-120", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 121, "from": 117, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-2f2bcf0b262e", "evidence": "Total potential, investment bars 68-296 mio. kr., year-by-year indfasning, alternative pace.", "position": 19, "objective": "Reconcile gross to net 855-1.135 mio. kr. and show investments", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 121, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The table includes rows for specific operational areas, overlaps, total net potential, average percentage, investments, and final net potential excluding investments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/121", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-121", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 121, "from": 117, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-2f2bcf0b262e", "evidence": "Total potential, investment bars 68-296 mio. kr., year-by-year indfasning, alternative pace.", "position": 19, "objective": "Reconcile gross to net 855-1.135 mio. kr. and show investments", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 122, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to show the distribution of FTE (årsværk) adjustments. Includes source attribution to BCG and Struensee & Co.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/122", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-122", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 129, "from": 122, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-31abc80ff671", "evidence": "FTE distribution by myndighed, military vs. civilian, M1-M4 levels, low vs. high potential.", "position": 20, "objective": "Decompose impact by entity, FTE category, and grade level", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 123, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart displays FTE reductions across three categories: Operative, IT/Material, and Administrative, with a total column. Data is segmented by year and estimate level.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/123", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-123", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 129, "from": 122, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-31abc80ff671", "evidence": "FTE distribution by myndighed, military vs. civilian, M1-M4 levels, low vs. high potential.", "position": 20, "objective": "Decompose impact by entity, FTE category, and grade level", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 124, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart shows negative values for 'Civile' and positive values for the other three categories, indicating a conversion or shift in roles.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/124", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-124", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 129, "from": 122, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-31abc80ff671", "evidence": "FTE distribution by myndighed, military vs. civilian, M1-M4 levels, low vs. high potential.", "position": 20, "objective": "Decompose impact by entity, FTE category, and grade level", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 125, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart highlights that most reductions occur at middle management (M2xx) and leadership levels. Data is split into low and high estimates.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/125", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-125", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 129, "from": 122, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-31abc80ff671", "evidence": "FTE distribution by myndighed, military vs. civilian, M1-M4 levels, low vs. high potential.", "position": 20, "objective": "Decompose impact by entity, FTE category, and grade level", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 126, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart compares current structure with two proposed scenarios (low span vs high span) across four job levels.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/126", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-126", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 129, "from": 122, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-31abc80ff671", "evidence": "FTE distribution by myndighed, military vs. civilian, M1-M4 levels, low vs. high potential.", "position": 20, "objective": "Decompose impact by entity, FTE category, and grade level", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 127, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart compares current staffing levels against two proposed scenarios (low and high range) across four management levels.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/127", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-127", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 129, "from": 122, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-31abc80ff671", "evidence": "FTE distribution by myndighed, military vs. civilian, M1-M4 levels, low vs. high potential.", "position": 20, "objective": "Decompose impact by entity, FTE category, and grade level", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 128, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table breaks down budget reductions by department and category (operative, support/IT, administrative, and overlaps).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/128", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-128", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 129, "from": 122, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-31abc80ff671", "evidence": "FTE distribution by myndighed, military vs. civilian, M1-M4 levels, low vs. high potential.", "position": 20, "objective": "Decompose impact by entity, FTE category, and grade level", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 129, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The table breaks down budget impacts by department and category (operational, materiel/IT, administrative, and overlaps).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/129", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-129", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 129, "from": 122, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-31abc80ff671", "evidence": "FTE distribution by myndighed, military vs. civilian, M1-M4 levels, low vs. high potential.", "position": 20, "objective": "Decompose impact by entity, FTE category, and grade level", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 130, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table displays financial and operational potential (Løn/ØD) across multiple organizational units. BCG/Struensee branding present.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/130", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-130", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 131, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table displays financial or resource potential values across multiple organizational units (VFK, Hæren, Søværnet, etc.) and specific initiatives (26-35).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/131", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-131", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 132, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table breaks down financial potential (Løn, ØD, Anlæg) by specific organizational units and initiatives.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/132", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-132", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 133, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table displays 'Løn' (Salary) and 'ØD' (Operating Expenses) impacts for 25 initiatives across multiple organizational units.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/133", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-133", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 134, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table displays financial impact data across multiple organizational units. The rows represent specific initiatives, and columns represent organizational entities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/134", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-134", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 135, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table includes rows for specific initiatives (36-45) and summary rows for overlaps and totals.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/135", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-135", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 136, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The table maps specific efficiency proposals (numbered 7, 12, 13, 15, 16, 21) to their corresponding task eliminations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/136", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-136", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 137, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Data source: Notat af 29. maj 2017 fra FMN.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/137", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-137", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 138, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide details collaboration with FES (Forsvarets Bygnings- og Etablissementstjeneste) and VFK (Værnsfælles Forsvarskommando) to assess infrastructure needs and financial implications.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/138", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-138", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 139, "slideType": "table_of_contents", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/139", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-139", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 140, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide lists specific operational efficiency proposals that were deemed unfeasible due to lack of revenue, time constraints, or mutual exclusivity.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/140", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-140", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 144, "from": 140, "name": "Elimination", "slug": "07-elimination", "bestFor": "Decision justification, recommendation defense, skeptical stakeholders", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-37262b5ac5e5", "evidence": "Five-part 'Udgåede effektiviseringsforslag' list explaining why 28 proposals were closed.", "position": 21, "objective": "Justify which proposals were dropped and why", "structure": "The Options -> Why Not A -> Why Not B -> Why C is the Answer", "confidence": 80, "description": "Systematically rule out alternatives to arrive at the only viable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 141, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide is part of a series (II/V) documenting discarded efficiency measures for the Danish Armed Forces.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/141", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-141", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 144, "from": 140, "name": "Elimination", "slug": "07-elimination", "bestFor": "Decision justification, recommendation defense, skeptical stakeholders", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-37262b5ac5e5", "evidence": "Five-part 'Udgåede effektiviseringsforslag' list explaining why 28 proposals were closed.", "position": 21, "objective": "Justify which proposals were dropped and why", "structure": "The Options -> Why Not A -> Why Not B -> Why C is the Answer", "confidence": 80, "description": "Systematically rule out alternatives to arrive at the only viable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 142, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide is part of a series (III/V) documenting discarded efficiency measures.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/142", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-142", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 144, "from": 140, "name": "Elimination", "slug": "07-elimination", "bestFor": "Decision justification, recommendation defense, skeptical stakeholders", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-37262b5ac5e5", "evidence": "Five-part 'Udgåede effektiviseringsforslag' list explaining why 28 proposals were closed.", "position": 21, "objective": "Justify which proposals were dropped and why", "structure": "The Options -> Why Not A -> Why Not B -> Why C is the Answer", "confidence": 80, "description": "Systematically rule out alternatives to arrive at the only viable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 143, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide lists specific organizational proposals (e.g., Frederiksberg Slot, Army training consolidation, Arctic Command) and explains why they were dropped (usually because they were already covered by other reorganization plans or deemed unfeasible).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/143", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-143", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 144, "from": 140, "name": "Elimination", "slug": "07-elimination", "bestFor": "Decision justification, recommendation defense, skeptical stakeholders", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-37262b5ac5e5", "evidence": "Five-part 'Udgåede effektiviseringsforslag' list explaining why 28 proposals were closed.", "position": 21, "objective": "Justify which proposals were dropped and why", "structure": "The Options -> Why Not A -> Why Not B -> Why C is the Answer", "confidence": 80, "description": "Systematically rule out alternatives to arrive at the only viable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 144, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide lists two specific areas where efficiency proposals were considered but ultimately discarded.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/144", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-144", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 144, "from": 140, "name": "Elimination", "slug": "07-elimination", "bestFor": "Decision justification, recommendation defense, skeptical stakeholders", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-37262b5ac5e5", "evidence": "Five-part 'Udgåede effektiviseringsforslag' list explaining why 28 proposals were closed.", "position": 21, "objective": "Justify which proposals were dropped and why", "structure": "The Options -> Why Not A -> Why Not B -> Why C is the Answer", "confidence": 80, "description": "Systematically rule out alternatives to arrive at the only viable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 145, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to outline the logistics reorganization initiative, including financial impact and operational considerations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/145", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-145", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 147, "from": 145, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3bf7554bbb68", "evidence": "Three one-pagers (35-60, 46, 285 mio. kr.) flagged for videreførelse.", "position": 22, "objective": "Add the three proposals continuing outside the analysis", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 70, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 146, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to present a business case for a specific military procurement initiative.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/146", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-146", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 147, "from": 145, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3bf7554bbb68", "evidence": "Three one-pagers (35-60, 46, 285 mio. kr.) flagged for videreførelse.", "position": 22, "objective": "Add the three proposals continuing outside the analysis", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 70, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 147, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to present a business case/diagnosis for organizational optimization.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/147", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-147", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 147, "from": 145, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3bf7554bbb68", "evidence": "Three one-pagers (35-60, 46, 285 mio. kr.) flagged for videreførelse.", "position": 22, "objective": "Add the three proposals continuing outside the analysis", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 70, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 148, "slideType": "table_of_contents", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/148", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-148", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 149, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a simple table-like structure to distinguish between primary and secondary goals.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/149", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-149", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 150, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide serves as a disclaimer/limitation note for a scaling model developed by BCG/Struensee.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/150", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-150", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 151, "slideType": "table_of_contents", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/151", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-151", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 152, "slideType": "other", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a two-column comparison structure to define tasks vs. capabilities in a military/defense context.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/152", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-152", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 162, "from": 152, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3c7d05fd6019", "evidence": "Process diagrams walk through 4 trin: kapacitetsudvælgelse → omkostninger → skalering → økonomisk effekt; Thetis worked example on p.160.", "position": 23, "objective": "Zoom into Track-4 capacity-scaling methodology", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 153, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a sequential process framework to define the analytical approach.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/153", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-153", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 162, "from": 152, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3c7d05fd6019", "evidence": "Process diagrams walk through 4 trin: kapacitetsudvælgelse → omkostninger → skalering → økonomisk effekt; Thetis worked example on p.160.", "position": 23, "objective": "Zoom into Track-4 capacity-scaling methodology", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 154, "slideType": "process", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide outlines a methodology for capacity selection, cost definition, scaling analysis, and economic impact assessment.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/154", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-154", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 162, "from": 152, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3c7d05fd6019", "evidence": "Process diagrams walk through 4 trin: kapacitetsudvælgelse → omkostninger → skalering → økonomisk effekt; Thetis worked example on p.160.", "position": 23, "objective": "Zoom into Track-4 capacity-scaling methodology", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 155, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a funnel framework to visualize the filtering process of military capabilities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/155", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-155", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 162, "from": 152, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3c7d05fd6019", "evidence": "Process diagrams walk through 4 trin: kapacitetsudvælgelse → omkostninger → skalering → økonomisk effekt; Thetis worked example on p.160.", "position": 23, "objective": "Zoom into Track-4 capacity-scaling methodology", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 156, "slideType": "cost_structure", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a logic of additive cost components leading to a total base, followed by exclusions and a normalization approach for representative costs.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/156", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-156", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 162, "from": 152, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3c7d05fd6019", "evidence": "Process diagrams walk through 4 trin: kapacitetsudvælgelse → omkostninger → skalering → økonomisk effekt; Thetis worked example on p.160.", "position": 23, "objective": "Zoom into Track-4 capacity-scaling methodology", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 157, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The diagram illustrates a causal chain where task scaling leads to activity changes, which then drive resource and cost requirements.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/157", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-157", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 162, "from": 152, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3c7d05fd6019", "evidence": "Process diagrams walk through 4 trin: kapacitetsudvælgelse → omkostninger → skalering → økonomisk effekt; Thetis worked example on p.160.", "position": 23, "objective": "Zoom into Track-4 capacity-scaling methodology", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 158, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a causal chain/process flow to illustrate how scaling decisions propagate through activity levels to cost impacts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/158", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-158", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 162, "from": 152, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3c7d05fd6019", "evidence": "Process diagrams walk through 4 trin: kapacitetsudvælgelse → omkostninger → skalering → økonomisk effekt; Thetis worked example on p.160.", "position": 23, "objective": "Zoom into Track-4 capacity-scaling methodology", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 159, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide outlines a three-step logic: estimating representative costs, multiplying by scenario units, and applying time-based phasing profiles.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/159", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-159", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 162, "from": 152, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3c7d05fd6019", "evidence": "Process diagrams walk through 4 trin: kapacitetsudvælgelse → omkostninger → skalering → økonomisk effekt; Thetis worked example on p.160.", "position": 23, "objective": "Zoom into Track-4 capacity-scaling methodology", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 160, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a 2x2 grid layout to present a four-step process.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/160", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-160", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 162, "from": 152, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3c7d05fd6019", "evidence": "Process diagrams walk through 4 trin: kapacitetsudvælgelse → omkostninger → skalering → økonomisk effekt; Thetis worked example on p.160.", "position": 23, "objective": "Zoom into Track-4 capacity-scaling methodology", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 161, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide serves as a disclaimer/methodological disclosure for a financial or operational model.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/161", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-161", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 162, "from": 152, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3c7d05fd6019", "evidence": "Process diagrams walk through 4 trin: kapacitetsudvælgelse → omkostninger → skalering → økonomisk effekt; Thetis worked example on p.160.", "position": 23, "objective": "Zoom into Track-4 capacity-scaling methodology", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 162, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a two-column layout to map excluded capabilities to their specific exclusion criteria.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/162", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-162", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 162, "from": 152, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3c7d05fd6019", "evidence": "Process diagrams walk through 4 trin: kapacitetsudvælgelse → omkostninger → skalering → økonomisk effekt; Thetis worked example on p.160.", "position": 23, "objective": "Zoom into Track-4 capacity-scaling methodology", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 163, "slideType": "table_of_contents", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/163", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-163", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 164, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Includes a footnote regarding Army capabilities and cost variations based on deployment duration.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/164", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-164", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 183, "from": 164, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-40d41af340bf", "evidence": "20 small-multiples 'Skaleringsoversigt' pages showing 5-7 scenarios per capacity (Thetis, EH101, IKK, Leopard, Absalon, etc.).", "position": 24, "objective": "Show up/down scenarios for each of the 15 operative capacities", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 90, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 165, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table includes a legend for 'Basis for 2017' and detailed footnotes explaining the methodology and specific scenario constraints.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/165", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-165", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 183, "from": 164, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-40d41af340bf", "evidence": "20 small-multiples 'Skaleringsoversigt' pages showing 5-7 scenarios per capacity (Thetis, EH101, IKK, Leopard, Absalon, etc.).", "position": 24, "objective": "Show up/down scenarios for each of the 15 operative capacities", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 90, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 166, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a scenario-based comparison framework to evaluate operational scaling options.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/166", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-166", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 183, "from": 164, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-40d41af340bf", "evidence": "20 small-multiples 'Skaleringsoversigt' pages showing 5-7 scenarios per capacity (Thetis, EH101, IKK, Leopard, Absalon, etc.).", "position": 24, "objective": "Show up/down scenarios for each of the 15 operative capacities", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 90, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }