{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 72, "pageSize": 30, "pageCount": 10666, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced", "docSlug": "37f2d6c9a34eff09", "documentTitle": "Introduction to A&M Services in Asia", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 38, "slideType": "roadmap", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a linear process flow to describe consulting services.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced/38", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced#slide-38", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 35, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-3555732fea73", "evidence": "Disputes (p35-36), Investigations & forensic accounting (p37-38), Compliance (p39), Forensic technology (p40).", "position": 4, "objective": "Break Disputes & Investigations into distinct, complete capability areas", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 65, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 41, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-a519781895f3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Recent PI projects (p21), service-line teams (p23,28-29,33-34), Chambers/GIR/WWL recognition (p41).", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced", "docSlug": "37f2d6c9a34eff09", "documentTitle": "Introduction to A&M Services in Asia", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 39, "slideType": "other", "function": "present_solution", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced/39", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced#slide-39", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 35, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-3555732fea73", "evidence": "Disputes (p35-36), Investigations & forensic accounting (p37-38), Compliance (p39), Forensic technology (p40).", "position": 4, "objective": "Break Disputes & Investigations into distinct, complete capability areas", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 65, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 41, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-a519781895f3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Recent PI projects (p21), service-line teams (p23,28-29,33-34), Chambers/GIR/WWL recognition (p41).", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced", "docSlug": "37f2d6c9a34eff09", "documentTitle": "Introduction to A&M Services in Asia", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 40, "slideType": "other", "function": "present_solution", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced/40", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced#slide-40", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 35, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-3555732fea73", "evidence": "Disputes (p35-36), Investigations & forensic accounting (p37-38), Compliance (p39), Forensic technology (p40).", "position": 4, "objective": "Break Disputes & Investigations into distinct, complete capability areas", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 65, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 41, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-a519781895f3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Recent PI projects (p21), service-line teams (p23,28-29,33-34), Chambers/GIR/WWL recognition (p41).", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced", "docSlug": "37f2d6c9a34eff09", "documentTitle": "Introduction to A&M Services in Asia", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 41, "slideType": "other", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "The slide uses a two-column layout to distinguish between practice-wide and individual expert recognition.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced/41", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced#slide-41", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 41, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-a519781895f3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Recent PI projects (p21), service-line teams (p23,28-29,33-34), Chambers/GIR/WWL recognition (p41).", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced", "docSlug": "37f2d6c9a34eff09", "documentTitle": "Introduction to A&M Services in Asia", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 42, "slideType": "disclaimer", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced/42", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e1433b468ced#slide-42", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/kxvJemfYsEdXBJXHh-YT4e9YJgRDi5qctppMcnMhRdg/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy80ZTM3ZDgzZWU2ZTI1ZmFlL3AwMDEuanBn", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-1", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/SVBtKNEBmRxNm7xZ_xuNOb1wBFwex_wfVGCc765qpNU/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy80ZTM3ZDgzZWU2ZTI1ZmFlL3AwMDEucG5n", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/AQSdrq-b21wd4o_bGOXzeWW9-FLaQQOZ3o9poOlqfGw/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy80ZTM3ZDgzZWU2ZTI1ZmFlL3AwMDEuanBn", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/cqKuhbM4ccH6AtUG7_DC_mZPu0ckrqbkbF9NFBKWEHI/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy80ZTM3ZDgzZWU2ZTI1ZmFlL3AwMDEucG5n" }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "table_of_contents", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-2", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide outlines the methodology for selecting 76 E&P companies based on a $50M market cap minimum, replacing the previous 'top 100' approach.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 3, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-55581f9130fb", "evidence": "Intro establishes data set; Key Takeaways slide groups Total Comp / AIP / LTI insights with stat callouts", "position": 1, "objective": "Frame methodology then cascade headline data into so-what insights across three comp categories", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 65, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-c605dcbb08e5", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Surface Observation", "beatSlug": "onion-surface-observation", "evidence": "Intro frames scope; Key Takeaways gives top-line synthesis", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 3, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-55581f9130fb", "evidence": "Intro establishes data set; Key Takeaways slide groups Total Comp / AIP / LTI insights with stat callouts", "position": 1, "objective": "Frame methodology then cascade headline data into so-what insights across three comp categories", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 65, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-c605dcbb08e5", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Surface Observation", "beatSlug": "onion-surface-observation", "evidence": "Intro frames scope; Key Takeaways gives top-line synthesis", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide presents two distinct sections: Change in Control Benefits and Bankruptcy Compensation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 5, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-59a38f36534e", "evidence": "CEO vs CFO bars and donut breakouts; quartile-segmented data on incentive share", "position": 2, "objective": "Split total compensation by role and market-cap quartile to expose magnitude and mix", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 70, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-cb72ea7c4f9d", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer", "evidence": "Total compensation magnitude and mix - the visible layer", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Data sourced from 2017 proxy statements.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 5, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-59a38f36534e", "evidence": "CEO vs CFO bars and donut breakouts; quartile-segmented data on incentive share", "position": 2, "objective": "Split total compensation by role and market-cap quartile to expose magnitude and mix", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 70, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-cb72ea7c4f9d", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer", "evidence": "Total compensation magnitude and mix - the visible layer", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses donut charts to visualize the breakdown of total compensation components.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 5, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-59a38f36534e", "evidence": "CEO vs CFO bars and donut breakouts; quartile-segmented data on incentive share", "position": 2, "objective": "Split total compensation by role and market-cap quartile to expose magnitude and mix", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 70, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-cb72ea7c4f9d", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer", "evidence": "Total compensation magnitude and mix - the visible layer", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "quote_slide", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a stylized financial background with stock market-like charts and numbers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 8, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-5dd8fd38592c", "evidence": "Quote intro plus 3 data slides each adding evidence about AIP prevalence and structure", "position": 3, "objective": "Aggregate AIP evidence (discretion type, metrics, market-condition response) into pattern about plan design", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-cfce13a66087", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Annual incentive plan and LTI mechanics decomposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart shows that larger companies (Top Quartile) are more likely to use 'Part Formulaic/Part Discretionary' plans, while smaller companies (Bottom Quartile) lean more towards 'Discretionary' plans.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 8, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-5dd8fd38592c", "evidence": "Quote intro plus 3 data slides each adding evidence about AIP prevalence and structure", "position": 3, "objective": "Aggregate AIP evidence (discretion type, metrics, market-condition response) into pattern about plan design", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-cfce13a66087", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Annual incentive plan and LTI mechanics decomposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide discusses the shift from formulaic to discretionary compensation and provides a bar chart showing the prevalence of specific performance metrics.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 8, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-5dd8fd38592c", "evidence": "Quote intro plus 3 data slides each adding evidence about AIP prevalence and structure", "position": 3, "objective": "Aggregate AIP evidence (discretion type, metrics, market-condition response) into pattern about plan design", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-cfce13a66087", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Annual incentive plan and LTI mechanics decomposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide presents two tables comparing CEO and CFO incentive payout structures (Threshold, Target, Maximum) across percentiles.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 8, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-5dd8fd38592c", "evidence": "Quote intro plus 3 data slides each adding evidence about AIP prevalence and structure", "position": 3, "objective": "Aggregate AIP evidence (discretion type, metrics, market-condition response) into pattern about plan design", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-cfce13a66087", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Annual incentive plan and LTI mechanics decomposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "quote_slide", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 12, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-61fc47176d7c", "evidence": "Quote intro then 7 data slides each contributing one LTI design dimension", "position": 4, "objective": "Layer LTI evidence (vehicle mix, performance metrics, period, payout) into pattern of best practice", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 75, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-cfce13a66087", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Annual incentive plan and LTI mechanics decomposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a grouped bar chart to compare the prevalence of three types of LTI awards across 2015, 2016, and 2017.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 12, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-61fc47176d7c", "evidence": "Quote intro then 7 data slides each contributing one LTI design dimension", "position": 4, "objective": "Layer LTI evidence (vehicle mix, performance metrics, period, payout) into pattern of best practice", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 75, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-cfce13a66087", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Annual incentive plan and LTI mechanics decomposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Data presented in two grouped bar charts comparing LTI practices across years and market cap segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 12, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-61fc47176d7c", "evidence": "Quote intro then 7 data slides each contributing one LTI design dimension", "position": 4, "objective": "Layer LTI evidence (vehicle mix, performance metrics, period, payout) into pattern of best practice", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 75, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-cfce13a66087", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Annual incentive plan and LTI mechanics decomposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Includes definitions of ratable vs cliff vesting.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 12, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-61fc47176d7c", "evidence": "Quote intro then 7 data slides each contributing one LTI design dimension", "position": 4, "objective": "Layer LTI evidence (vehicle mix, performance metrics, period, payout) into pattern of best practice", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 75, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-cfce13a66087", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Annual incentive plan and LTI mechanics decomposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Includes two bar charts: one showing prevalence by market cap quartile, the other comparing ratable vs. cliff vesting across 2015-2017.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 12, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-61fc47176d7c", "evidence": "Quote intro then 7 data slides each contributing one LTI design dimension", "position": 4, "objective": "Layer LTI evidence (vehicle mix, performance metrics, period, payout) into pattern of best practice", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 75, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-cfce13a66087", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Annual incentive plan and LTI mechanics decomposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Includes data on TSR (Total Shareholder Return) usage and multi-metric award prevalence.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 12, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-61fc47176d7c", "evidence": "Quote intro then 7 data slides each contributing one LTI design dimension", "position": 4, "objective": "Layer LTI evidence (vehicle mix, performance metrics, period, payout) into pattern of best practice", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 75, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-cfce13a66087", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Annual incentive plan and LTI mechanics decomposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a quote to reinforce the strategic rationale for longer performance periods.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 12, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-61fc47176d7c", "evidence": "Quote intro then 7 data slides each contributing one LTI design dimension", "position": 4, "objective": "Layer LTI evidence (vehicle mix, performance metrics, period, payout) into pattern of best practice", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 75, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-cfce13a66087", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Annual incentive plan and LTI mechanics decomposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart highlights that 200% of target is the most prevalent maximum payout level.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 12, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-61fc47176d7c", "evidence": "Quote intro then 7 data slides each contributing one LTI design dimension", "position": 4, "objective": "Layer LTI evidence (vehicle mix, performance metrics, period, payout) into pattern of best practice", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 75, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-cfce13a66087", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Annual incentive plan and LTI mechanics decomposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "quote_slide", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-65c4dd9f03c3", "evidence": "Quote intro then table plus 4 trend slides on different CIC components", "position": 5, "objective": "Stack change-in-control evidence (benefit values, severance, double trigger, excise tax) into pattern", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-d2dd149b620a", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Change-in-control benefits as the critical retention lever", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide provides a detailed breakdown of compensation components across market capitalization quartiles for CEOs and CFOs, with a specific focus on the impact of LTI valuation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-65c4dd9f03c3", "evidence": "Quote intro then table plus 4 trend slides on different CIC components", "position": 5, "objective": "Stack change-in-control evidence (benefit values, severance, double trigger, excise tax) into pattern", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-d2dd149b620a", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Change-in-control benefits as the critical retention lever", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-65c4dd9f03c3", "evidence": "Quote intro then table plus 4 trend slides on different CIC components", "position": 5, "objective": "Stack change-in-control evidence (benefit values, severance, double trigger, excise tax) into pattern", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-d2dd149b620a", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Change-in-control benefits as the critical retention lever", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Data presented as donut charts showing distribution of severance multiples.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-65c4dd9f03c3", "evidence": "Quote intro then table plus 4 trend slides on different CIC components", "position": 5, "objective": "Stack change-in-control evidence (benefit values, severance, double trigger, excise tax) into pattern", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-d2dd149b620a", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Change-in-control benefits as the critical retention lever", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide defines single, double, and discretionary triggers and provides a bar chart comparing their prevalence in 2016 vs 2017.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-65c4dd9f03c3", "evidence": "Quote intro then table plus 4 trend slides on different CIC components", "position": 5, "objective": "Stack change-in-control evidence (benefit values, severance, double trigger, excise tax) into pattern", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-d2dd149b620a", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Change-in-control benefits as the critical retention lever", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide defines common 'Golden Parachute' tax mitigation strategies and provides a breakdown of their usage in the industry.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-65c4dd9f03c3", "evidence": "Quote intro then table plus 4 trend slides on different CIC components", "position": 5, "objective": "Stack change-in-control evidence (benefit values, severance, double trigger, excise tax) into pattern", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-d2dd149b620a", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Change-in-control benefits as the critical retention lever", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }