{
  "kind": "all",
  "value": "all",
  "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 319975,
  "page": 598,
  "pageSize": 30,
  "pageCount": 10666,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 5,
      "slideType": "cover",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/5",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-5",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54a0-722e-a491-86c4fa6a3eb0",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Debt stock + 5 challenges to fiscus with charts",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 6,
      "slideType": "problem_statement",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": "The slide uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to represent the central role of the government in relation to five specific fiscal issues.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/6",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-6",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 6,
          "name": "Root Cause Tree",
          "slug": "37-root-cause-tree",
          "bestFor": "Problem diagnosis, quality issues, operational failures",
          "matchId": "019de98a-55e1-76ea-b3ef-38f2e2b7e256",
          "evidence": "p6 central Government node fans into 5 challenge circles, p7-9 detail each with charts.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Decompose fiscal weakness into 5 root causes",
          "structure": "The Problem -> Branch 1 (Cause A) -> Branch 2 (Cause B) -> Branch 3 (Cause C) -> The Primary Root",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Branch out from a problem to its multiple contributing causes"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54a0-722e-a491-86c4fa6a3eb0",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Debt stock + 5 challenges to fiscus with charts",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 7,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a dual-axis chart approach to show both absolute values (N$) and percentage of GDP for debt and deficit.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/7",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-7",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 6,
          "name": "Root Cause Tree",
          "slug": "37-root-cause-tree",
          "bestFor": "Problem diagnosis, quality issues, operational failures",
          "matchId": "019de98a-55e1-76ea-b3ef-38f2e2b7e256",
          "evidence": "p6 central Government node fans into 5 challenge circles, p7-9 detail each with charts.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Decompose fiscal weakness into 5 root causes",
          "structure": "The Problem -> Branch 1 (Cause A) -> Branch 2 (Cause B) -> Branch 3 (Cause C) -> The Primary Root",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Branch out from a problem to its multiple contributing causes"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54a0-722e-a491-86c4fa6a3eb0",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Debt stock + 5 challenges to fiscus with charts",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 8,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The chart includes a callout indicating an increase in personnel expenditure over the period, with total expenditure values at the start and end points.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/8",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-8",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 6,
          "name": "Root Cause Tree",
          "slug": "37-root-cause-tree",
          "bestFor": "Problem diagnosis, quality issues, operational failures",
          "matchId": "019de98a-55e1-76ea-b3ef-38f2e2b7e256",
          "evidence": "p6 central Government node fans into 5 challenge circles, p7-9 detail each with charts.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Decompose fiscal weakness into 5 root causes",
          "structure": "The Problem -> Branch 1 (Cause A) -> Branch 2 (Cause B) -> Branch 3 (Cause C) -> The Primary Root",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Branch out from a problem to its multiple contributing causes"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54a0-722e-a491-86c4fa6a3eb0",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Debt stock + 5 challenges to fiscus with charts",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 9,
      "slideType": "pain_points",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a dual-axis combo chart to illustrate the dependency on SACU revenue.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/9",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-9",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 6,
          "name": "Root Cause Tree",
          "slug": "37-root-cause-tree",
          "bestFor": "Problem diagnosis, quality issues, operational failures",
          "matchId": "019de98a-55e1-76ea-b3ef-38f2e2b7e256",
          "evidence": "p6 central Government node fans into 5 challenge circles, p7-9 detail each with charts.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Decompose fiscal weakness into 5 root causes",
          "structure": "The Problem -> Branch 1 (Cause A) -> Branch 2 (Cause B) -> Branch 3 (Cause C) -> The Primary Root",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Branch out from a problem to its multiple contributing causes"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54a0-722e-a491-86c4fa6a3eb0",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Debt stock + 5 challenges to fiscus with charts",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 10,
      "slideType": "financial_analysis",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The chart title mentions 2019/20, but the data covers three years.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/10",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-10",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019de98a-5611-735d-a9d9-9c7921f489f1",
          "evidence": "Sequence ends with explicit 'Spending Priorities' chevron after expenditure breakdowns.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Cascade rev/exp data into spending priorities",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 65,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 19,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 11,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "Data source: PwC Namibia Budget Review 2019/2020.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/11",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-11",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019de98a-5611-735d-a9d9-9c7921f489f1",
          "evidence": "Sequence ends with explicit 'Spending Priorities' chevron after expenditure breakdowns.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Cascade rev/exp data into spending priorities",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 65,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 19,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 12,
      "slideType": "comparison_table",
      "function": "compare_options",
      "notes": "The chart shows budget figures in N$ millions for 10 categories. The 'Other' category is missing a percentage label.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/12",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-12",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019de98a-5611-735d-a9d9-9c7921f489f1",
          "evidence": "Sequence ends with explicit 'Spending Priorities' chevron after expenditure breakdowns.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Cascade rev/exp data into spending priorities",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 65,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 19,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 13,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The chart displays absolute values in N$ thousands, despite the title mentioning N$ millions.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/13",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-13",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019de98a-5611-735d-a9d9-9c7921f489f1",
          "evidence": "Sequence ends with explicit 'Spending Priorities' chevron after expenditure breakdowns.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Cascade rev/exp data into spending priorities",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 65,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 19,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 14,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/14",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-14",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019de98a-5611-735d-a9d9-9c7921f489f1",
          "evidence": "Sequence ends with explicit 'Spending Priorities' chevron after expenditure breakdowns.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Cascade rev/exp data into spending priorities",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 65,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 19,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 15,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "prioritize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a chevron-based process flow to represent a prioritized list.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/15",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-15",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019de98a-5611-735d-a9d9-9c7921f489f1",
          "evidence": "Sequence ends with explicit 'Spending Priorities' chevron after expenditure breakdowns.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Cascade rev/exp data into spending priorities",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 65,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 19,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 16,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "prioritize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a bubble-cluster diagram to emphasize 'Reigning in Expenditure' as the central focus.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/16",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-16",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 19,
          "from": 16,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019de98a-563e-756f-baf9-763f49090083",
          "evidence": "p16 names Quality Spending, Revenue Mobilization, Structural Reforms around expenditure control.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Present consolidation as 3 mutually-exclusive pillars",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 19,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 17,
      "slideType": "financial_analysis",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The chart shows a dual-axis combination of bar (expenditure in N$) and line (expenditure as % of GDP).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/17",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-17",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 19,
          "from": 16,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019de98a-563e-756f-baf9-763f49090083",
          "evidence": "p16 names Quality Spending, Revenue Mobilization, Structural Reforms around expenditure control.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Present consolidation as 3 mutually-exclusive pillars",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 19,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 18,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "The slide contrasts quantitative revenue forecasts with a qualitative list of structural reforms.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/18",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-18",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 19,
          "from": 16,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019de98a-563e-756f-baf9-763f49090083",
          "evidence": "p16 names Quality Spending, Revenue Mobilization, Structural Reforms around expenditure control.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Present consolidation as 3 mutually-exclusive pillars",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 19,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 19,
      "slideType": "kpi_dashboard",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide highlights the fiscal consolidation efforts by tracking deficit and debt levels against GDP.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/19",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-19",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 19,
          "from": 16,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019de98a-563e-756f-baf9-763f49090083",
          "evidence": "p16 names Quality Spending, Revenue Mobilization, Structural Reforms around expenditure control.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Present consolidation as 3 mutually-exclusive pillars",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 19,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 20,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide uses a dramatic background image of a dead tree under a starry sky, likely to emphasize the 'low growth' theme.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/20",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-20",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 20,
          "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
          "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
          "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
          "matchId": "019de98a-5666-713e-9e01-d635f5afed04",
          "evidence": "p20/p25 explicitly chart Namibia vs regional and global GDP outlook.",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Contrast Namibia GDP/revenue vs region/global",
          "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
          "confidence": 65,
          "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 20,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 21,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The chart title 'REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE COMPARISON: 2019/20' seems slightly mislabeled as it covers three years.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/21",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-21",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 20,
          "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
          "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
          "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
          "matchId": "019de98a-5666-713e-9e01-d635f5afed04",
          "evidence": "p20/p25 explicitly chart Namibia vs regional and global GDP outlook.",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Contrast Namibia GDP/revenue vs region/global",
          "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
          "confidence": 65,
          "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 20,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 22,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/22",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-22",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 20,
          "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
          "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
          "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
          "matchId": "019de98a-5666-713e-9e01-d635f5afed04",
          "evidence": "p20/p25 explicitly chart Namibia vs regional and global GDP outlook.",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Contrast Namibia GDP/revenue vs region/global",
          "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
          "confidence": 65,
          "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 20,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 23,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide uses a donut chart for the revenue composition and horizontal bar charts for historical comparisons.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/23",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-23",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 20,
          "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
          "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
          "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
          "matchId": "019de98a-5666-713e-9e01-d635f5afed04",
          "evidence": "p20/p25 explicitly chart Namibia vs regional and global GDP outlook.",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Contrast Namibia GDP/revenue vs region/global",
          "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
          "confidence": 65,
          "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 20,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 24,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "PwC Namibia Budget Review 2019/2020",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/24",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-24",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 20,
          "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
          "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
          "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
          "matchId": "019de98a-5666-713e-9e01-d635f5afed04",
          "evidence": "p20/p25 explicitly chart Namibia vs regional and global GDP outlook.",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Contrast Namibia GDP/revenue vs region/global",
          "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
          "confidence": 65,
          "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 20,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 25,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide uses a dramatic background image of a dead tree under a starry sky, likely to emphasize the 'low growth' theme.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/25",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-25",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 20,
          "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
          "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
          "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
          "matchId": "019de98a-5666-713e-9e01-d635f5afed04",
          "evidence": "p20/p25 explicitly chart Namibia vs regional and global GDP outlook.",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Contrast Namibia GDP/revenue vs region/global",
          "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
          "confidence": 65,
          "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 20,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 26,
      "slideType": "financial_analysis",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The chart highlights the fiscal pressure by comparing 2018 projections against 2019 projections for both revenue and expenditure.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/26",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-26",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 20,
          "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
          "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
          "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
          "matchId": "019de98a-5666-713e-9e01-d635f5afed04",
          "evidence": "p20/p25 explicitly chart Namibia vs regional and global GDP outlook.",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Contrast Namibia GDP/revenue vs region/global",
          "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
          "confidence": 65,
          "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 20,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 27,
      "slideType": "comparison_table",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/27",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-27",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 27,
          "name": "Benchmark Gap",
          "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
          "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
          "matchId": "019de98a-568e-7786-87e6-9679f0e84c0d",
          "evidence": "Side-by-side 6-country teardrop charts for corporate tax and VAT.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Position Namibia vs peers on tax rates",
          "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
          "confidence": 88,
          "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 20,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 28,
      "slideType": "comparison_table",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": "The slide uses a hanging drop chart visualization to display VAT percentages for Namibia, Angola, Botswana, South Africa, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/28",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-28",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 27,
          "name": "Benchmark Gap",
          "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
          "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
          "matchId": "019de98a-568e-7786-87e6-9679f0e84c0d",
          "evidence": "Side-by-side 6-country teardrop charts for corporate tax and VAT.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Position Namibia vs peers on tax rates",
          "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
          "confidence": 88,
          "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 20,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 29,
      "slideType": "geographic_map",
      "function": "establish_context",
      "notes": "PwC Namibia Budget Review 2019/2020",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/29",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-29",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 20,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 30,
      "slideType": "problem_statement",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": "The slide uses a gear-based process diagram to show how current economic factors are linked.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/30",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-30",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 30,
          "name": "Pivot",
          "slug": "17-pivot",
          "bestFor": "Project updates, board meetings, agile retrospectives",
          "matchId": "019de98a-56b8-727e-becb-8b7e619daafe",
          "evidence": "Gears diagram on p30 routes 3 dependencies into 'Agro-Processing' as new direction.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Pivot from commodity dependence to agro-processing",
          "structure": "The Original Hypothesis -> The New Discovery -> The Strategic Shift",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Validate a change in direction by showing it is a reaction to new intelligence, not failure"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 20,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 31,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/31",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-31",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 30,
          "name": "Pivot",
          "slug": "17-pivot",
          "bestFor": "Project updates, board meetings, agile retrospectives",
          "matchId": "019de98a-56b8-727e-becb-8b7e619daafe",
          "evidence": "Gears diagram on p30 routes 3 dependencies into 'Agro-Processing' as new direction.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Pivot from commodity dependence to agro-processing",
          "structure": "The Original Hypothesis -> The New Discovery -> The Strategic Shift",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Validate a change in direction by showing it is a reaction to new intelligence, not failure"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 20,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 32,
      "slideType": "market_landscape",
      "function": "size_opportunity",
      "notes": "The slide uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to represent regional market access and a pie chart for budget allocation.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/32",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-32",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 30,
          "name": "Pivot",
          "slug": "17-pivot",
          "bestFor": "Project updates, board meetings, agile retrospectives",
          "matchId": "019de98a-56b8-727e-becb-8b7e619daafe",
          "evidence": "Gears diagram on p30 routes 3 dependencies into 'Agro-Processing' as new direction.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Pivot from commodity dependence to agro-processing",
          "structure": "The Original Hypothesis -> The New Discovery -> The Strategic Shift",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Validate a change in direction by showing it is a reaction to new intelligence, not failure"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 20,
          "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 33,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/33",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-33",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 41,
          "from": 33,
          "beatId": "019de98a-5517-74ae-ab2f-8b92f8ee39db",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Structural reforms, tax proposals, private sector close",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 39,
          "from": 33,
          "beatId": "019de98a-55b8-75e9-bbf9-8ca2e2d888bd",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Structural reforms and tax proposals",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5",
      "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20",
      "authorId": "PwC",
      "authorName": "PwC",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 34,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The diagram uses a circular flow to represent interconnected reform initiatives.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/34",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-34",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 41,
          "from": 33,
          "beatId": "019de98a-5517-74ae-ab2f-8b92f8ee39db",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Structural reforms, tax proposals, private sector close",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 39,
          "from": 33,
          "beatId": "019de98a-55b8-75e9-bbf9-8ca2e2d888bd",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Structural reforms and tax proposals",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}