{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 557, "pageSize": 60, "pageCount": 5333, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/xtZfYg0frIR41LSx1cWqy12Dq5vODss6foWOcOeFUrc/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8yNTI5ZTg2Y2MxY2YyZDhkL3AwMDEuanBn", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-1", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/rW_1I3Out5J1UQCAKZFkBYjgLyb3--m3UQVMnc7BhP8/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8yNTI5ZTg2Y2MxY2YyZDhkL3AwMDEucG5n", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/TO0u8OBzgQiEFB1zecRRbPshGL0FX46bhf80XH6pI4U/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8yNTI5ZTg2Y2MxY2YyZDhkL3AwMDEuanBn", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/QYgTYzKUMkjItDv-EuU6Wo07_LAkrrnWyA7TvU173js/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8yNTI5ZTg2Y2MxY2YyZDhkL3AwMDEucG5n" }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-2", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "table_of_contents", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-3", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a two-column text layout to introduce the context of climate change and the strategic role of green hydrogen.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-4", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-ca2a8d8587b8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Introduction, value chain, shades of hydrogen, drivers and scenarios establish the field", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "appendix", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide is divided into two distinct sections: 'About this guide' and 'IRENA's work on green hydrogen and hard to abate sectors'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-5", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-ca2a8d8587b8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Introduction, value chain, shades of hydrogen, drivers and scenarios establish the field", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a mix of historical facts and chemical definitions to frame the topic of green hydrogen.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 6, "name": "Value Chain Walk", "slug": "44-value-chain-walk", "bestFor": "Operations improvement, cost reduction, competitive advantage", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-614a76bdef73", "evidence": "Figure 1.1 explicitly walks Production→Transformation→Transport→End Use", "position": 1, "objective": "Map green hydrogen across production, transformation, transport, end use", "structure": "Input -> Process Step 1 -> Process Step 2 -> Process Step 3 -> Output -> Value Assessment", "confidence": 85, "description": "Walk through each step of the value chain to identify where value is created or destroyed" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-ca2a8d8587b8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Introduction, value chain, shades of hydrogen, drivers and scenarios establish the field", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-de5cfdcfdb18", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Status, drivers, scenarios for green hydrogen", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a value chain framework to map the lifecycle of green hydrogen from renewable energy sources to various industrial and transport applications.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 6, "name": "Value Chain Walk", "slug": "44-value-chain-walk", "bestFor": "Operations improvement, cost reduction, competitive advantage", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-614a76bdef73", "evidence": "Figure 1.1 explicitly walks Production→Transformation→Transport→End Use", "position": 1, "objective": "Map green hydrogen across production, transformation, transport, end use", "structure": "Input -> Process Step 1 -> Process Step 2 -> Process Step 3 -> Output -> Value Assessment", "confidence": 85, "description": "Walk through each step of the value chain to identify where value is created or destroyed" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-ca2a8d8587b8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Introduction, value chain, shades of hydrogen, drivers and scenarios establish the field", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-de5cfdcfdb18", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Status, drivers, scenarios for green hydrogen", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a table to map hydrogen 'shades' (Grey, Blue, Turquoise, Green) to their respective production processes and energy sources.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 6, "name": "Value Chain Walk", "slug": "44-value-chain-walk", "bestFor": "Operations improvement, cost reduction, competitive advantage", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-614a76bdef73", "evidence": "Figure 1.1 explicitly walks Production→Transformation→Transport→End Use", "position": 1, "objective": "Map green hydrogen across production, transformation, transport, end use", "structure": "Input -> Process Step 1 -> Process Step 2 -> Process Step 3 -> Output -> Value Assessment", "confidence": 85, "description": "Walk through each step of the value chain to identify where value is created or destroyed" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-ca2a8d8587b8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Introduction, value chain, shades of hydrogen, drivers and scenarios establish the field", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-de5cfdcfdb18", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Status, drivers, scenarios for green hydrogen", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a color-coded classification system for hydrogen types.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 9, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-678a3a437cb1", "evidence": "Drivers section narrows from macro context to electricity-cost driver and scenario implications", "position": 2, "objective": "Drill into drivers and scenario role for green hydrogen", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-ca2a8d8587b8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Introduction, value chain, shades of hydrogen, drivers and scenarios establish the field", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-de5cfdcfdb18", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Status, drivers, scenarios for green hydrogen", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "Includes a footnote explaining fuel cell principles.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 9, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-678a3a437cb1", "evidence": "Drivers section narrows from macro context to electricity-cost driver and scenario implications", "position": 2, "objective": "Drill into drivers and scenario role for green hydrogen", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-ca2a8d8587b8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Introduction, value chain, shades of hydrogen, drivers and scenarios establish the field", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-de5cfdcfdb18", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Status, drivers, scenarios for green hydrogen", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide continues a numbered list (3, 4, 5, 6) describing drivers for green hydrogen.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 9, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-678a3a437cb1", "evidence": "Drivers section narrows from macro context to electricity-cost driver and scenario implications", "position": 2, "objective": "Drill into drivers and scenario role for green hydrogen", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-ca2a8d8587b8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Introduction, value chain, shades of hydrogen, drivers and scenarios establish the field", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-de5cfdcfdb18", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Status, drivers, scenarios for green hydrogen", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 65, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "Uses icons to categorize threats (skull for air, speaker for noise, warning for fire).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/65", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-65", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 65, "from": 55, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-963bc221d215", "evidence": "Current emissions highest in SSA (p57); solar can avoid 5M tonnes CO2e by 2030 (p56, p64)", "position": 8, "objective": "Environment dimension: emissions trajectory vs FGN 45% target", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8370f154005a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Health, Education, Food security, Environment, Trade dimension chapters", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8ddb0b48fe56", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Lost ANC coverage, study hours, food, MSME revenue, GHG emissions piled up", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 66, "slideType": "business_case", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a three-part structure: Use case, Rationale, and Impact measures, connected by a flow line.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/66", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-66", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 66, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-9b29295c56f0", "evidence": "$4-5bn lost annually (p71), 10% of fires (p72); solar markets see 30-40% revenue lift (p74) yields $1-2bn GDP uplift", "position": 9, "objective": "Trade dimension: MSME income lift from solar", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 84, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8370f154005a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Health, Education, Food security, Environment, Trade dimension chapters", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8ddb0b48fe56", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Lost ANC coverage, study hours, food, MSME revenue, GHG emissions piled up", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 67, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a clear problem-solution structure, contrasting the current reliance on expensive, dangerous generators with the benefits of solar mini-grids.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/67", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-67", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 66, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-9b29295c56f0", "evidence": "$4-5bn lost annually (p71), 10% of fires (p72); solar markets see 30-40% revenue lift (p74) yields $1-2bn GDP uplift", "position": 9, "objective": "Trade dimension: MSME income lift from solar", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 84, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8370f154005a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Health, Education, Food security, Environment, Trade dimension chapters", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8ddb0b48fe56", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Lost ANC coverage, study hours, food, MSME revenue, GHG emissions piled up", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 68, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a callout box on the left to emphasize the primary finding for Nigeria.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/68", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-68", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 66, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-9b29295c56f0", "evidence": "$4-5bn lost annually (p71), 10% of fires (p72); solar markets see 30-40% revenue lift (p74) yields $1-2bn GDP uplift", "position": 9, "objective": "Trade dimension: MSME income lift from solar", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 84, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8370f154005a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Health, Education, Food security, Environment, Trade dimension chapters", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8ddb0b48fe56", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Lost ANC coverage, study hours, food, MSME revenue, GHG emissions piled up", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 69, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to show the breakdown of power reliability and the subsequent reliance on generators.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/69", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-69", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 66, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-9b29295c56f0", "evidence": "$4-5bn lost annually (p71), 10% of fires (p72); solar markets see 30-40% revenue lift (p74) yields $1-2bn GDP uplift", "position": 9, "objective": "Trade dimension: MSME income lift from solar", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 84, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8370f154005a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Health, Education, Food security, Environment, Trade dimension chapters", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8ddb0b48fe56", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Lost ANC coverage, study hours, food, MSME revenue, GHG emissions piled up", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 70, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart to compare LCOE and a circular callout to emphasize the fire risk statistic.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/70", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-70", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 66, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-9b29295c56f0", "evidence": "$4-5bn lost annually (p71), 10% of fires (p72); solar markets see 30-40% revenue lift (p74) yields $1-2bn GDP uplift", "position": 9, "objective": "Trade dimension: MSME income lift from solar", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 84, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8370f154005a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Health, Education, Food security, Environment, Trade dimension chapters", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8ddb0b48fe56", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Lost ANC coverage, study hours, food, MSME revenue, GHG emissions piled up", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 71, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a two-part visual: a stacked bar chart showing the prevalence of reduced hours, and a bar chart showing the distribution of hours lost per day, culminating in a total impact figure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/71", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-71", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 66, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-9b29295c56f0", "evidence": "$4-5bn lost annually (p71), 10% of fires (p72); solar markets see 30-40% revenue lift (p74) yields $1-2bn GDP uplift", "position": 9, "objective": "Trade dimension: MSME income lift from solar", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 84, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8370f154005a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Health, Education, Food security, Environment, Trade dimension chapters", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8ddb0b48fe56", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Lost ANC coverage, study hours, food, MSME revenue, GHG emissions piled up", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 72, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a combination of qualitative causal explanations and a quantitative bar chart to illustrate the problem.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/72", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-72", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 66, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-9b29295c56f0", "evidence": "$4-5bn lost annually (p71), 10% of fires (p72); solar markets see 30-40% revenue lift (p74) yields $1-2bn GDP uplift", "position": 9, "objective": "Trade dimension: MSME income lift from solar", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 84, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8370f154005a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Health, Education, Food security, Environment, Trade dimension chapters", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8ddb0b48fe56", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Lost ANC coverage, study hours, food, MSME revenue, GHG emissions piled up", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 73, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart to compare different causes of fire-related financial losses for MSMEs, with a callout emphasizing the impact of generator-linked fires.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/73", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-73", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 66, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-9b29295c56f0", "evidence": "$4-5bn lost annually (p71), 10% of fires (p72); solar markets see 30-40% revenue lift (p74) yields $1-2bn GDP uplift", "position": 9, "objective": "Trade dimension: MSME income lift from solar", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 84, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8370f154005a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Health, Education, Food security, Environment, Trade dimension chapters", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8ddb0b48fe56", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Lost ANC coverage, study hours, food, MSME revenue, GHG emissions piled up", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 74, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a causal chain logic to link power supply to operating hours and subsequently to revenue.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/74", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-74", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 66, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-9b29295c56f0", "evidence": "$4-5bn lost annually (p71), 10% of fires (p72); solar markets see 30-40% revenue lift (p74) yields $1-2bn GDP uplift", "position": 9, "objective": "Trade dimension: MSME income lift from solar", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 84, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8370f154005a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Health, Education, Food security, Environment, Trade dimension chapters", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8ddb0b48fe56", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Lost ANC coverage, study hours, food, MSME revenue, GHG emissions piled up", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 75, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a combination of a bar chart for incident frequency and a table-like row of metrics for financial impact per period.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/75", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-75", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 66, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-9b29295c56f0", "evidence": "$4-5bn lost annually (p71), 10% of fires (p72); solar markets see 30-40% revenue lift (p74) yields $1-2bn GDP uplift", "position": 9, "objective": "Trade dimension: MSME income lift from solar", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 84, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8370f154005a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Health, Education, Food security, Environment, Trade dimension chapters", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8ddb0b48fe56", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Lost ANC coverage, study hours, food, MSME revenue, GHG emissions piled up", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 76, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a bridge-style visualization to show the baseline sales, the incremental increase, and the final post-deployment sales figure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/76", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-76", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 66, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-9b29295c56f0", "evidence": "$4-5bn lost annually (p71), 10% of fires (p72); solar markets see 30-40% revenue lift (p74) yields $1-2bn GDP uplift", "position": 9, "objective": "Trade dimension: MSME income lift from solar", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 84, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8370f154005a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Health, Education, Food security, Environment, Trade dimension chapters", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8ddb0b48fe56", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Lost ANC coverage, study hours, food, MSME revenue, GHG emissions piled up", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 77, "slideType": "table_of_contents", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/77", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-77", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 78, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a four-pillar structure to categorize market barriers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/78", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-78", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 83, "from": 78, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30d-55e440cc100b", "evidence": "Financing, Commercial, Operational, Enabling environment - each with own deep-dive slide", "position": 10, "objective": "Diagnose 4 distinct categories of barriers", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 86, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 85, "from": 78, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-85a46b629974", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Challenges across 4 pillars (p78-83) + 12 interventions in 4 pillars (p85)", "position": 5, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 85, "from": 78, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-91ad26b99563", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "Challenges diagnosed then 12 interventions across 4 pillars proposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 79, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a custom legend for 'Favorability for market entry' and 'Consultant Confidence level'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/79", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-79", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 83, "from": 78, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30d-55e440cc100b", "evidence": "Financing, Commercial, Operational, Enabling environment - each with own deep-dive slide", "position": 10, "objective": "Diagnose 4 distinct categories of barriers", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 86, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 85, "from": 78, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-85a46b629974", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Challenges across 4 pillars (p78-83) + 12 interventions in 4 pillars (p85)", "position": 5, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 85, "from": 78, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-91ad26b99563", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "Challenges diagnosed then 12 interventions across 4 pillars proposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 80, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide is part of an appendix, likely supporting a broader financial assessment. It uses a specific color-coded legend for 'Favorability for market entry' and 'Consultant Confidence level'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/80", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-80", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 83, "from": 78, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30d-55e440cc100b", "evidence": "Financing, Commercial, Operational, Enabling environment - each with own deep-dive slide", "position": 10, "objective": "Diagnose 4 distinct categories of barriers", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 86, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 85, "from": 78, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-85a46b629974", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Challenges across 4 pillars (p78-83) + 12 interventions in 4 pillars (p85)", "position": 5, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 85, "from": 78, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-91ad26b99563", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "Challenges diagnosed then 12 interventions across 4 pillars proposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 81, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a custom legend for 'Favorability for market entry' and 'Consultant Confidence level'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/81", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-81", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 83, "from": 78, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30d-55e440cc100b", "evidence": "Financing, Commercial, Operational, Enabling environment - each with own deep-dive slide", "position": 10, "objective": "Diagnose 4 distinct categories of barriers", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 86, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 85, "from": 78, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-85a46b629974", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Challenges across 4 pillars (p78-83) + 12 interventions in 4 pillars (p85)", "position": 5, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 85, "from": 78, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-91ad26b99563", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "Challenges diagnosed then 12 interventions across 4 pillars proposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 82, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a custom assessment framework with a legend for favorability and confidence.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/82", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-82", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 83, "from": 78, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30d-55e440cc100b", "evidence": "Financing, Commercial, Operational, Enabling environment - each with own deep-dive slide", "position": 10, "objective": "Diagnose 4 distinct categories of barriers", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 86, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 85, "from": 78, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-85a46b629974", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Challenges across 4 pillars (p78-83) + 12 interventions in 4 pillars (p85)", "position": 5, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 85, "from": 78, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-91ad26b99563", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "Challenges diagnosed then 12 interventions across 4 pillars proposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 83, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a custom assessment framework with color-coded favorability indicators and consultant confidence levels.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/83", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-83", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 83, "from": 78, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30d-55e440cc100b", "evidence": "Financing, Commercial, Operational, Enabling environment - each with own deep-dive slide", "position": 10, "objective": "Diagnose 4 distinct categories of barriers", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 86, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 85, "from": 78, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-85a46b629974", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Challenges across 4 pillars (p78-83) + 12 interventions in 4 pillars (p85)", "position": 5, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 85, "from": 78, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-91ad26b99563", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "Challenges diagnosed then 12 interventions across 4 pillars proposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 84, "slideType": "table_of_contents", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/84", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-84", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 85, "from": 78, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-85a46b629974", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Challenges across 4 pillars (p78-83) + 12 interventions in 4 pillars (p85)", "position": 5, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 85, "from": 78, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-91ad26b99563", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "Challenges diagnosed then 12 interventions across 4 pillars proposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 85, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a horizontal process-like layout to group interventions under four thematic pillars.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/85", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-85", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 85, "from": 85, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30d-588acd52e33f", "evidence": "12 interventions structured into 4 pillars from stakeholder consultations", "position": 11, "objective": "Sequence 12 interventions across 4 pillars", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 70, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 85, "from": 78, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-85a46b629974", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Challenges across 4 pillars (p78-83) + 12 interventions in 4 pillars (p85)", "position": 5, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 85, "from": 78, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-91ad26b99563", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "Challenges diagnosed then 12 interventions across 4 pillars proposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 86, "slideType": "disclaimer", "function": "other", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/86", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-86", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 87, "slideType": "closing_ask", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/87", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-87", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "docSlug": "0ec770bd87313ce8", "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Guide to Cybersecurity", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.784, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/yvc-lSfjbkvLecoafV5hrOb09PQG16LnY2ObzfN-6cA/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8wZWM3NzBiZDg3MzEzY2U4L3AwMDEuanBn", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b#slide-1", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-64c707d12a09", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover hook 'Are We Safe?', TOC, intro on why CEOs must ask these questions", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/Zpz5U1sYSGcmy-bPCytXzDRCvSdhOwD-kDe0oEb03BQ/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8wZWM3NzBiZDg3MzEzY2U4L3AwMDEucG5n", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/uib4Zt5LESIfCB1XBUbsYRWZuUAbGaEx5MR34l-5cdA/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8wZWM3NzBiZDg3MzEzY2U4L3AwMDEuanBn", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/sCiBIFOiGLIpAQFe_4_ma94CYSMYztVtLX3Q4XHE9HY/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8wZWM3NzBiZDg3MzEzY2U4L3AwMDEucG5n" }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "docSlug": "0ec770bd87313ce8", "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Guide to Cybersecurity", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.784, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "table_of_contents", "function": "front_matter", "notes": "The slide uses a teal background with white text and dotted leaders connecting the section titles to page numbers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b#slide-2", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-64c707d12a09", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover hook 'Are We Safe?', TOC, intro on why CEOs must ask these questions", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "docSlug": "0ec770bd87313ce8", "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Guide to Cybersecurity", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.784, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide introduces two foundational questions: 'Are you sure?' and 'Why are you sure?' as a baseline for evaluating cybersecurity information.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30d-fd91b0cb420d", "evidence": "Intro frames the question set, then six distinct, non-overlapping diagnostic questions (assets, training, strategy, attack vectors, recovery, prevention)", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate the foundational cybersecurity readiness questions a CEO must diagnose", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 70, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-64c707d12a09", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover hook 'Are We Safe?', TOC, intro on why CEOs must ask these questions", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "docSlug": "0ec770bd87313ce8", "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Guide to Cybersecurity", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.784, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list format (1) to structure a diagnostic inquiry into asset management.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30d-fd91b0cb420d", "evidence": "Intro frames the question set, then six distinct, non-overlapping diagnostic questions (assets, training, strategy, attack vectors, recovery, prevention)", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate the foundational cybersecurity readiness questions a CEO must diagnose", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 70, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-68abc4f9b35a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Questions 1-6 enumerate exposure: assets, education, strategy, attack vectors, recovery, prevention", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "docSlug": "0ec770bd87313ce8", "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Guide to Cybersecurity", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.784, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a '2' as a section marker, suggesting it is part of a larger diagnostic or assessment framework.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30d-fd91b0cb420d", "evidence": "Intro frames the question set, then six distinct, non-overlapping diagnostic questions (assets, training, strategy, attack vectors, recovery, prevention)", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate the foundational cybersecurity readiness questions a CEO must diagnose", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 70, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-68abc4f9b35a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Questions 1-6 enumerate exposure: assets, education, strategy, attack vectors, recovery, prevention", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "docSlug": "0ec770bd87313ce8", "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Guide to Cybersecurity", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.784, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a numbered header '3' suggesting it is part of a larger diagnostic sequence.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30d-fd91b0cb420d", "evidence": "Intro frames the question set, then six distinct, non-overlapping diagnostic questions (assets, training, strategy, attack vectors, recovery, prevention)", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate the foundational cybersecurity readiness questions a CEO must diagnose", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 70, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-68abc4f9b35a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Questions 1-6 enumerate exposure: assets, education, strategy, attack vectors, recovery, prevention", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "docSlug": "0ec770bd87313ce8", "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Guide to Cybersecurity", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.784, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "other", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "This slide is part of a series of diagnostic questions, likely for a board or executive leadership team.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30d-fd91b0cb420d", "evidence": "Intro frames the question set, then six distinct, non-overlapping diagnostic questions (assets, training, strategy, attack vectors, recovery, prevention)", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate the foundational cybersecurity readiness questions a CEO must diagnose", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 70, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-68abc4f9b35a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Questions 1-6 enumerate exposure: assets, education, strategy, attack vectors, recovery, prevention", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "docSlug": "0ec770bd87313ce8", "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Guide to Cybersecurity", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.784, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list format (5) to frame a diagnostic inquiry into organizational resilience.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30d-fd91b0cb420d", "evidence": "Intro frames the question set, then six distinct, non-overlapping diagnostic questions (assets, training, strategy, attack vectors, recovery, prevention)", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate the foundational cybersecurity readiness questions a CEO must diagnose", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 70, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-68abc4f9b35a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Questions 1-6 enumerate exposure: assets, education, strategy, attack vectors, recovery, prevention", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "docSlug": "0ec770bd87313ce8", "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Guide to Cybersecurity", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.784, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "other", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Part of a series of diagnostic questions for cybersecurity assessment.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30d-fd91b0cb420d", "evidence": "Intro frames the question set, then six distinct, non-overlapping diagnostic questions (assets, training, strategy, attack vectors, recovery, prevention)", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate the foundational cybersecurity readiness questions a CEO must diagnose", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 70, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-68abc4f9b35a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Questions 1-6 enumerate exposure: assets, education, strategy, attack vectors, recovery, prevention", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "docSlug": "0ec770bd87313ce8", "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Guide to Cybersecurity", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.784, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": "The slide uses a large '7' as a section marker, typical of a deck structure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 10, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-0316b53f0e64", "evidence": "Q7-Q11 cover distinct management levers: measurement, budget, threat outlook, talent, current risks", "position": 2, "objective": "Enumerate the operational/strategic management dimensions of a cybersecurity program", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 65, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-6dec5482820e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Q7-8 prescribe measurement program and budget allocation method", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "docSlug": "0ec770bd87313ce8", "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Guide to Cybersecurity", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.784, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list format (8) suggesting it is part of a larger series of questions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 10, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-0316b53f0e64", "evidence": "Q7-Q11 cover distinct management levers: measurement, budget, threat outlook, talent, current risks", "position": 2, "objective": "Enumerate the operational/strategic management dimensions of a cybersecurity program", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 65, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-6dec5482820e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Q7-8 prescribe measurement program and budget allocation method", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "docSlug": "0ec770bd87313ce8", "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Guide to Cybersecurity", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.784, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "transition", "function": "transition", "notes": "The slide uses a large number '9' as a section marker.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 10, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-0316b53f0e64", "evidence": "Q7-Q11 cover distinct management levers: measurement, budget, threat outlook, talent, current risks", "position": 2, "objective": "Enumerate the operational/strategic management dimensions of a cybersecurity program", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 65, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-717aa3475ad1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Q9-10 cite expert guidance on threat outlook and talent strategy", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "docSlug": "0ec770bd87313ce8", "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Guide to Cybersecurity", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.784, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a numbered header '10' suggesting it is part of a larger series of questions or steps.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 10, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-0316b53f0e64", "evidence": "Q7-Q11 cover distinct management levers: measurement, budget, threat outlook, talent, current risks", "position": 2, "objective": "Enumerate the operational/strategic management dimensions of a cybersecurity program", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 65, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-717aa3475ad1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Q9-10 cite expert guidance on threat outlook and talent strategy", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "docSlug": "0ec770bd87313ce8", "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Guide to Cybersecurity", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.784, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a '11' numbering, likely indicating a section or sequence number. It includes a decorative wave graphic.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 10, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-0316b53f0e64", "evidence": "Q7-Q11 cover distinct management levers: measurement, budget, threat outlook, talent, current risks", "position": 2, "objective": "Enumerate the operational/strategic management dimensions of a cybersecurity program", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 65, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-75a62047f8be", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Q11 culture-of-resilience close + CompTIA advisor authority backstop", "position": 5, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "docSlug": "0ec770bd87313ce8", "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Guide to Cybersecurity", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.784, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "other", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This slide serves as an organizational profile or 'About Us' page.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-54303fbbe19b#slide-15", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-75a62047f8be", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Q11 culture-of-resilience close + CompTIA advisor authority backstop", "position": 5, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "docSlug": "9502c7945ed8adea", "documentTitle": "US Inflation Reduction Act: Climate & Energy Featuresand Potential Implications", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "Practice Greenhealth", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Includes a footnote detailing tax credit mechanisms like direct pay and transferability.", "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/XtKIQwrLuWnPjZcn6RnLlZJl9pxWnlpp--iTAILky6A/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy85NTAyYzc5NDVlZDhhZGVhL3AwMDEuanBn", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673#slide-1", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 1, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4431d6caa79d", "evidence": "Cover lists 7 distinct sections; each subsequent page works through a sector with non-overlapping provisions.", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate IRA climate/energy provisions across mutually exclusive sectoral categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 1, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-180c81c79b56", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover defines IRA scope and lists 7 sections to follow.", "position": 1, "confidence": 45, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/9SUR9z8zm1aYbAwAtnTG4fvUC1z7q0baW9usmmBcEmw/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy85NTAyYzc5NDVlZDhhZGVhL3AwMDEucG5n", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/FhpBbivDTOYM5zE_3hjGuy5p4lRgxb5nLN8u_I788Gw/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy85NTAyYzc5NDVlZDhhZGVhL3AwMDEuanBn", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/eidNqD4QicxMK8-2kqkQS5LQBlEoWYeMEu6lrY_nYEM/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy85NTAyYzc5NDVlZDhhZGVhL3AwMDEucG5n" }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "docSlug": "9502c7945ed8adea", "documentTitle": "US Inflation Reduction Act: Climate & Energy Featuresand Potential Implications", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "Practice Greenhealth", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Part of a series of summaries on IRA provisions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673#slide-2", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 1, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4431d6caa79d", "evidence": "Cover lists 7 distinct sections; each subsequent page works through a sector with non-overlapping provisions.", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate IRA climate/energy provisions across mutually exclusive sectoral categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" }, { "to": 11, "from": 2, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4accc5227b16", "evidence": "Each section adds dollar-figure provisions ($4.3B HOMES, $4B EJ, $290B DOE) building toward the IRA total.", "position": 2, "objective": "Add up sectoral tax credits and grants into the IRA's total climate investment", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 55, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-1df209bb3e08", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sector-by-sector breakdown of IRA provisions and tax credits.", "position": 2, "confidence": 45, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "docSlug": "9502c7945ed8adea", "documentTitle": "US Inflation Reduction Act: Climate & Energy Featuresand Potential Implications", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "Practice Greenhealth", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide provides technical details on tax credit phase-outs, eligibility, and specific investment amounts for transmission infrastructure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 1, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4431d6caa79d", "evidence": "Cover lists 7 distinct sections; each subsequent page works through a sector with non-overlapping provisions.", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate IRA climate/energy provisions across mutually exclusive sectoral categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" }, { "to": 11, "from": 2, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4accc5227b16", "evidence": "Each section adds dollar-figure provisions ($4.3B HOMES, $4B EJ, $290B DOE) building toward the IRA total.", "position": 2, "objective": "Add up sectoral tax credits and grants into the IRA's total climate investment", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 55, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-1df209bb3e08", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sector-by-sector breakdown of IRA provisions and tax credits.", "position": 2, "confidence": 45, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "docSlug": "9502c7945ed8adea", "documentTitle": "US Inflation Reduction Act: Climate & Energy Featuresand Potential Implications", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "Practice Greenhealth", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Page 4 of a summary deck on the Inflation Reduction Act.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 1, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4431d6caa79d", "evidence": "Cover lists 7 distinct sections; each subsequent page works through a sector with non-overlapping provisions.", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate IRA climate/energy provisions across mutually exclusive sectoral categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" }, { "to": 11, "from": 2, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4accc5227b16", "evidence": "Each section adds dollar-figure provisions ($4.3B HOMES, $4B EJ, $290B DOE) building toward the IRA total.", "position": 2, "objective": "Add up sectoral tax credits and grants into the IRA's total climate investment", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 55, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-1df209bb3e08", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sector-by-sector breakdown of IRA provisions and tax credits.", "position": 2, "confidence": 45, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "docSlug": "9502c7945ed8adea", "documentTitle": "US Inflation Reduction Act: Climate & Energy Featuresand Potential Implications", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "Practice Greenhealth", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This slide appears to be a continuation from a previous page, starting mid-sentence.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 1, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4431d6caa79d", "evidence": "Cover lists 7 distinct sections; each subsequent page works through a sector with non-overlapping provisions.", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate IRA climate/energy provisions across mutually exclusive sectoral categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" }, { "to": 11, "from": 2, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4accc5227b16", "evidence": "Each section adds dollar-figure provisions ($4.3B HOMES, $4B EJ, $290B DOE) building toward the IRA total.", "position": 2, "objective": "Add up sectoral tax credits and grants into the IRA's total climate investment", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 55, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-1df209bb3e08", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sector-by-sector breakdown of IRA provisions and tax credits.", "position": 2, "confidence": 45, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "docSlug": "9502c7945ed8adea", "documentTitle": "US Inflation Reduction Act: Climate & Energy Featuresand Potential Implications", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "Practice Greenhealth", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "This is page 6 of an Inflation Reduction Act summary document, formatted as a text-heavy slide or report page.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 1, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4431d6caa79d", "evidence": "Cover lists 7 distinct sections; each subsequent page works through a sector with non-overlapping provisions.", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate IRA climate/energy provisions across mutually exclusive sectoral categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" }, { "to": 11, "from": 2, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4accc5227b16", "evidence": "Each section adds dollar-figure provisions ($4.3B HOMES, $4B EJ, $290B DOE) building toward the IRA total.", "position": 2, "objective": "Add up sectoral tax credits and grants into the IRA's total climate investment", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 55, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-1df209bb3e08", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sector-by-sector breakdown of IRA provisions and tax credits.", "position": 2, "confidence": 45, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "docSlug": "9502c7945ed8adea", "documentTitle": "US Inflation Reduction Act: Climate & Energy Featuresand Potential Implications", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "Practice Greenhealth", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide lists specific legislative provisions including 179D (implied), 45L, 25D, 25C, and HOMES rebates.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 1, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4431d6caa79d", "evidence": "Cover lists 7 distinct sections; each subsequent page works through a sector with non-overlapping provisions.", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate IRA climate/energy provisions across mutually exclusive sectoral categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" }, { "to": 11, "from": 2, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4accc5227b16", "evidence": "Each section adds dollar-figure provisions ($4.3B HOMES, $4B EJ, $290B DOE) building toward the IRA total.", "position": 2, "objective": "Add up sectoral tax credits and grants into the IRA's total climate investment", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 55, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-1df209bb3e08", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sector-by-sector breakdown of IRA provisions and tax credits.", "position": 2, "confidence": 45, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "docSlug": "9502c7945ed8adea", "documentTitle": "US Inflation Reduction Act: Climate & Energy Featuresand Potential Implications", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "Practice Greenhealth", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Page 8 of a summary deck on the Inflation Reduction Act.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 1, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4431d6caa79d", "evidence": "Cover lists 7 distinct sections; each subsequent page works through a sector with non-overlapping provisions.", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate IRA climate/energy provisions across mutually exclusive sectoral categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" }, { "to": 11, "from": 2, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4accc5227b16", "evidence": "Each section adds dollar-figure provisions ($4.3B HOMES, $4B EJ, $290B DOE) building toward the IRA total.", "position": 2, "objective": "Add up sectoral tax credits and grants into the IRA's total climate investment", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 55, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-1df209bb3e08", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sector-by-sector breakdown of IRA provisions and tax credits.", "position": 2, "confidence": 45, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "docSlug": "9502c7945ed8adea", "documentTitle": "US Inflation Reduction Act: Climate & Energy Featuresand Potential Implications", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "Practice Greenhealth", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide lists various initiatives with their associated funding or policy goals.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 1, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4431d6caa79d", "evidence": "Cover lists 7 distinct sections; each subsequent page works through a sector with non-overlapping provisions.", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate IRA climate/energy provisions across mutually exclusive sectoral categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" }, { "to": 11, "from": 2, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4accc5227b16", "evidence": "Each section adds dollar-figure provisions ($4.3B HOMES, $4B EJ, $290B DOE) building toward the IRA total.", "position": 2, "objective": "Add up sectoral tax credits and grants into the IRA's total climate investment", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 55, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-1df209bb3e08", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sector-by-sector breakdown of IRA provisions and tax credits.", "position": 2, "confidence": 45, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "docSlug": "9502c7945ed8adea", "documentTitle": "US Inflation Reduction Act: Climate & Energy Featuresand Potential Implications", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "Practice Greenhealth", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide lists various government programs (48C, DOE programs, EPA funds) and their specific mandates.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 1, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4431d6caa79d", "evidence": "Cover lists 7 distinct sections; each subsequent page works through a sector with non-overlapping provisions.", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate IRA climate/energy provisions across mutually exclusive sectoral categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" }, { "to": 11, "from": 2, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4accc5227b16", "evidence": "Each section adds dollar-figure provisions ($4.3B HOMES, $4B EJ, $290B DOE) building toward the IRA total.", "position": 2, "objective": "Add up sectoral tax credits and grants into the IRA's total climate investment", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 55, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-1df209bb3e08", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sector-by-sector breakdown of IRA provisions and tax credits.", "position": 2, "confidence": 45, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "docSlug": "9502c7945ed8adea", "documentTitle": "US Inflation Reduction Act: Climate & Energy Featuresand Potential Implications", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "Practice Greenhealth", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Page 11 of a deck summarizing the Inflation Reduction Act.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-53af739fb673#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 1, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4431d6caa79d", "evidence": "Cover lists 7 distinct sections; each subsequent page works through a sector with non-overlapping provisions.", "position": 1, "objective": "Enumerate IRA climate/energy provisions across mutually exclusive sectoral categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" }, { "to": 11, "from": 2, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-4accc5227b16", "evidence": "Each section adds dollar-figure provisions ($4.3B HOMES, $4B EJ, $290B DOE) building toward the IRA total.", "position": 2, "objective": "Add up sectoral tax credits and grants into the IRA's total climate investment", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 55, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-20f5125a1a73", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "DOE Loan Guarantee callout: $290B authority enables private investment.", "position": 3, "confidence": 45, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }