{
  "kind": "all",
  "value": "all",
  "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 319975,
  "page": 55,
  "pageSize": 60,
  "pageCount": 5333,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 5,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/5",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-5",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 5,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a649f8adf4db",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Cover, intro, exec summary, sector boundaries, agenda",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 6,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The slide uses stacked bar charts to show the composition of employment and spend across different sub-sectors of the filmed production industry.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/6",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-6",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 6,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-9c2f12ad04aa",
          "evidence": "Each slide breaks down a different segment of filmed entertainment with consistent metrics ($ spend, jobs).",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Size NYC filmed entertainment by segment (TV, film, commercials, production-related)",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 7,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The slide uses a table to show job growth by sector and bullet points to explain the drivers (incentives, TV/reality show boom).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/7",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-7",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 6,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-9c2f12ad04aa",
          "evidence": "Each slide breaks down a different segment of filmed entertainment with consistent metrics ($ spend, jobs).",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Size NYC filmed entertainment by segment (TV, film, commercials, production-related)",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 8,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/8",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-8",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 6,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-9c2f12ad04aa",
          "evidence": "Each slide breaks down a different segment of filmed entertainment with consistent metrics ($ spend, jobs).",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Size NYC filmed entertainment by segment (TV, film, commercials, production-related)",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 9,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The slide uses stacked bar charts to show growth in spend and FTEs, supplemented by a data table showing the number of shows.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/9",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-9",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 6,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-9c2f12ad04aa",
          "evidence": "Each slide breaks down a different segment of filmed entertainment with consistent metrics ($ spend, jobs).",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Size NYC filmed entertainment by segment (TV, film, commercials, production-related)",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 10,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The chart uses a dual-axis combination (stacked bar for spend, line for FTEs).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/10",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-10",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 6,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-9c2f12ad04aa",
          "evidence": "Each slide breaks down a different segment of filmed entertainment with consistent metrics ($ spend, jobs).",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Size NYC filmed entertainment by segment (TV, film, commercials, production-related)",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 11,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide uses a dual-axis chart (bar for spend, line for FTEs) to show trends in two segments of the filmed entertainment industry.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/11",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-11",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 6,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-9c2f12ad04aa",
          "evidence": "Each slide breaks down a different segment of filmed entertainment with consistent metrics ($ spend, jobs).",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Size NYC filmed entertainment by segment (TV, film, commercials, production-related)",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 12,
      "slideType": "impact_sizing",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The chart shows a trend of production-related jobs in NYC, with a note explaining the distinction between direct production-related jobs and broader indirect economic impacts.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/12",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-12",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 6,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-9c2f12ad04aa",
          "evidence": "Each slide breaks down a different segment of filmed entertainment with consistent metrics ($ spend, jobs).",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Size NYC filmed entertainment by segment (TV, film, commercials, production-related)",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 13,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/13",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-13",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 14,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "Includes a dual-axis chart showing FTEs (stacked bar) and revenue (line) from 2002-2011, with a supporting table for average salary.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/14",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-14",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 15,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/15",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-15",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 16,
      "slideType": "market_landscape",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "Includes a dual-axis chart (stacked bar for FTEs, line for revenues) and a data table for salary metrics.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/16",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-16",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 16,
          "name": "Benchmark Gap",
          "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
          "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-a2815f654acf",
          "evidence": "p.17 explicitly compares NYC job growth (+40k) vs US (-40k) across subsectors with shared salary.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Position NYC media against US national performance",
          "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 17,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide uses a table to contrast NYC's share of US media jobs across subsectors and provides qualitative drivers for this growth.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/17",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-17",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 16,
          "name": "Benchmark Gap",
          "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
          "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-a2815f654acf",
          "evidence": "p.17 explicitly compares NYC job growth (+40k) vs US (-40k) across subsectors with shared salary.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Position NYC media against US national performance",
          "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 18,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/18",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-18",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 19,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "Includes a dual-axis chart combining stacked bar (FTEs) and line (revenues) with a data table for average salary.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/19",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-19",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 20,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/20",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-20",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 21,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "Includes a dual-axis chart combining stacked bar (FTEs) and line (revenue) data, with a supporting data table for average salary.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/21",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-21",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 22,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/22",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-22",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 23,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "establish_context",
      "notes": "The chart combines a bar chart for FTEs and a line chart for revenues, with a data table for average salary at the bottom.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/23",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-23",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 23,
          "name": "Pattern Hunter",
          "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
          "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-a4268ef610ac",
          "evidence": "Sector growth chart, VC explosion chart, and 4-year activity timeline together show one digital boom pattern.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Build evidence that NYC's digital/tech sector has emerged as a force",
          "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
          "confidence": 72,
          "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 24,
      "slideType": "market_landscape",
      "function": "size_opportunity",
      "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to compare NYC VC investment against other regions (LA, Silicon Valley, Other) and provides supporting bullet points on market maturity.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/24",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-24",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 23,
          "name": "Pattern Hunter",
          "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
          "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-a4268ef610ac",
          "evidence": "Sector growth chart, VC explosion chart, and 4-year activity timeline together show one digital boom pattern.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Build evidence that NYC's digital/tech sector has emerged as a force",
          "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
          "confidence": 72,
          "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 25,
      "slideType": "timeline",
      "function": "establish_context",
      "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-style timeline layout to track four distinct categories of activity over time.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/25",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-25",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 23,
          "name": "Pattern Hunter",
          "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
          "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-a4268ef610ac",
          "evidence": "Sector growth chart, VC explosion chart, and 4-year activity timeline together show one digital boom pattern.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Build evidence that NYC's digital/tech sector has emerged as a force",
          "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
          "confidence": 72,
          "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 26,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/26",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-26",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 27,
      "slideType": "key_takeaways",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list of findings paired with corresponding pull-quotes.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/27",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-27",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 27,
          "name": "Voice Of Customer",
          "slug": "51-voice-of-customer",
          "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-a9f6c8383863",
          "evidence": "Both slides are structured as numbered themes paired with verbatim torn-paper quotes from interviewees.",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Surface the city's perceived strengths and weaknesses through media-leader interviews",
          "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response",
          "confidence": 88,
          "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 29,
          "from": 27,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-af870a2f6899",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Interview-derived concerns and subsector trend implications",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 29,
          "from": 27,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-bd59b1030f24",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Interview synthesis + subsector trend matrix",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 28,
      "slideType": "pain_points",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses numbered circles for the points and colored paper-strip graphics for the quotes.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/28",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-28",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 27,
          "name": "Voice Of Customer",
          "slug": "51-voice-of-customer",
          "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-a9f6c8383863",
          "evidence": "Both slides are structured as numbered themes paired with verbatim torn-paper quotes from interviewees.",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Surface the city's perceived strengths and weaknesses through media-leader interviews",
          "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response",
          "confidence": 88,
          "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 29,
          "from": 27,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-af870a2f6899",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Interview-derived concerns and subsector trend implications",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 29,
          "from": 27,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-bd59b1030f24",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Interview synthesis + subsector trend matrix",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 29,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide uses a custom matrix format to evaluate subsectors. BCG copyright present.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/29",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-29",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 30,
          "from": 29,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-af1c0b65612f",
          "evidence": "p.29 is the trend matrix (data → outlook arrows); p.30 translates outlook into growth-area recommendations.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Move from observed subsector trends to where future NYC growth will come from",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 29,
          "from": 27,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-af870a2f6899",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Interview-derived concerns and subsector trend implications",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 29,
          "from": 27,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-bd59b1030f24",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Interview synthesis + subsector trend matrix",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 30,
      "slideType": "comparison_table",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/30",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-30",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 30,
          "from": 29,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-af1c0b65612f",
          "evidence": "p.29 is the trend matrix (data → outlook arrows); p.30 translates outlook into growth-area recommendations.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Move from observed subsector trends to where future NYC growth will come from",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 36,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b1944c45139a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, four development dimensions, initiatives",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-c2798d405505",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, dev dimensions, subsector recommendations",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 31,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/31",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-31",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 36,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b1944c45139a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, four development dimensions, initiatives",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-c2798d405505",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, dev dimensions, subsector recommendations",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 32,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a structured table to map qualitative interview findings to strategic development pillars.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/32",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-32",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 36,
          "from": 32,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-b3ebcffac05d",
          "evidence": "p.32 declares four areas (sector promotion, community, talent, infrastructure); pp.33-36 populate them with initiatives.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Structure recommendations into four MECE development areas with initiatives",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 36,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b1944c45139a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, four development dimensions, initiatives",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-c2798d405505",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, dev dimensions, subsector recommendations",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 33,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/33",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-33",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 36,
          "from": 32,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-b3ebcffac05d",
          "evidence": "p.32 declares four areas (sector promotion, community, talent, infrastructure); pp.33-36 populate them with initiatives.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Structure recommendations into four MECE development areas with initiatives",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 36,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b1944c45139a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, four development dimensions, initiatives",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-c2798d405505",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, dev dimensions, subsector recommendations",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 34,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/34",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-34",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 36,
          "from": 32,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-b3ebcffac05d",
          "evidence": "p.32 declares four areas (sector promotion, community, talent, infrastructure); pp.33-36 populate them with initiatives.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Structure recommendations into four MECE development areas with initiatives",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 36,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b1944c45139a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, four development dimensions, initiatives",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-c2798d405505",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, dev dimensions, subsector recommendations",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 35,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "plan_implementation",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/35",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-35",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 36,
          "from": 32,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-b3ebcffac05d",
          "evidence": "p.32 declares four areas (sector promotion, community, talent, infrastructure); pp.33-36 populate them with initiatives.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Structure recommendations into four MECE development areas with initiatives",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 36,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b1944c45139a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, four development dimensions, initiatives",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-c2798d405505",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, dev dimensions, subsector recommendations",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 36,
      "slideType": "recommendation",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "Uses a temple metaphor to represent the three pillars of talent development.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/36",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-36",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 36,
          "from": 32,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-b3ebcffac05d",
          "evidence": "p.32 declares four areas (sector promotion, community, talent, infrastructure); pp.33-36 populate them with initiatives.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Structure recommendations into four MECE development areas with initiatives",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 36,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b1944c45139a",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, four development dimensions, initiatives",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-c2798d405505",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, dev dimensions, subsector recommendations",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 37,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/37",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-37",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-c2798d405505",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, dev dimensions, subsector recommendations",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 38,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a structured comparison table format to link industry challenges to potential policy responses.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/38",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-38",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 38,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-b596797179ce",
          "evidence": "Each appendix slide takes one subsector (filmed, broadcasting, publishing, advertising, digital) and pairs trends with city actions.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Tailor recommendations to each subsector",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 38,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b6c491c14056",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "Subsector-specific recommendations and priorities",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        },
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-c2798d405505",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, dev dimensions, subsector recommendations",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 39,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a 4-row matrix structure to map industry trends to potential policy responses.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/39",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-39",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 38,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-b596797179ce",
          "evidence": "Each appendix slide takes one subsector (filmed, broadcasting, publishing, advertising, digital) and pairs trends with city actions.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Tailor recommendations to each subsector",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 38,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b6c491c14056",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "Subsector-specific recommendations and priorities",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        },
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-c2798d405505",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, dev dimensions, subsector recommendations",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 40,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/40",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-40",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 38,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-b596797179ce",
          "evidence": "Each appendix slide takes one subsector (filmed, broadcasting, publishing, advertising, digital) and pairs trends with city actions.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Tailor recommendations to each subsector",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 38,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b6c491c14056",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "Subsector-specific recommendations and priorities",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        },
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-c2798d405505",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, dev dimensions, subsector recommendations",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 41,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list format to map specific trends to potential city actions.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/41",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-41",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 38,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-b596797179ce",
          "evidence": "Each appendix slide takes one subsector (filmed, broadcasting, publishing, advertising, digital) and pairs trends with city actions.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Tailor recommendations to each subsector",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 38,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b6c491c14056",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "Subsector-specific recommendations and priorities",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        },
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-c2798d405505",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, dev dimensions, subsector recommendations",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d",
      "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 42,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a 4-row table structure to map specific themes (Media startups, Big tech growth, Investment needs, Talent needs) to industry observations and policy suggestions.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/42",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-42",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 38,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-b596797179ce",
          "evidence": "Each appendix slide takes one subsector (filmed, broadcasting, publishing, advertising, digital) and pairs trends with city actions.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Tailor recommendations to each subsector",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 38,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b6c491c14056",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "Subsector-specific recommendations and priorities",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        },
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 30,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-c2798d405505",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Growth areas, dev dimensions, subsector recommendations",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 1,
      "slideType": "cover",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/emmmXGEMd7FZHoXj5uIJvpp5xwrkxGjKLxih1EbsW9g/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iYzljMjI4ODFkOTk3NDM1L3AwMDEuanBn",
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/1",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-1",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e0224ad2017b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Cover, objectives, 'BCG hired to do more with less', scope, joint team.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/oW2NKnqTyqbiRw5uY6r2LB0M2asL4m-0g91c9e9ccIg/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iYzljMjI4ODFkOTk3NDM1L3AwMDEucG5n",
      "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/nv7u4qqwDGKEZMb7uz2wEOfGAoHG6auQfl0O6A-6XwI/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iYzljMjI4ODFkOTk3NDM1L3AwMDEuanBn",
      "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/Wto5pQfuu7rcas2LGEtW3tYRGOKPHluKnugfqQJ3xR8/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iYzljMjI4ODFkOTk3NDM1L3AwMDEucG5n"
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 2,
      "slideType": "executive_summary",
      "function": "establish_context",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/2",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-2",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e0224ad2017b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Cover, objectives, 'BCG hired to do more with less', scope, joint team.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 3,
      "slideType": "table_of_contents",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/3",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-3",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e0224ad2017b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Cover, objectives, 'BCG hired to do more with less', scope, joint team.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 4,
      "slideType": "problem_statement",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/4",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-4",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 4,
          "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
          "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
          "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-e9ecd1635814",
          "evidence": "p4 mandate vs p7-8 expanded scope and BCG's $5M investment frame the gap.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Establish 'do more with less' mandate and BCG's expanded scope",
          "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e0224ad2017b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Cover, objectives, 'BCG hired to do more with less', scope, joint team.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 5,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "establish_context",
      "notes": "The slide uses a visual bridge to connect the vision to the specific list of imperatives.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/5",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-5",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 4,
          "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
          "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
          "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-e9ecd1635814",
          "evidence": "p4 mandate vs p7-8 expanded scope and BCG's $5M investment frame the gap.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Establish 'do more with less' mandate and BCG's expanded scope",
          "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e0224ad2017b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Cover, objectives, 'BCG hired to do more with less', scope, joint team.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 6,
      "slideType": "implementation_plan",
      "function": "plan_implementation",
      "notes": "The slide uses a chevron-based process flow to represent a multi-phase consulting engagement.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/6",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-6",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 4,
          "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
          "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
          "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-e9ecd1635814",
          "evidence": "p4 mandate vs p7-8 expanded scope and BCG's $5M investment frame the gap.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Establish 'do more with less' mandate and BCG's expanded scope",
          "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e0224ad2017b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Cover, objectives, 'BCG hired to do more with less', scope, joint team.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 7,
      "slideType": "segmentation",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": "The slide uses a star icon to denote areas receiving 'deep dive' support.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/7",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-7",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 4,
          "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
          "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
          "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-e9ecd1635814",
          "evidence": "p4 mandate vs p7-8 expanded scope and BCG's $5M investment frame the gap.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Establish 'do more with less' mandate and BCG's expanded scope",
          "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e0224ad2017b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Cover, objectives, 'BCG hired to do more with less', scope, joint team.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 8,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a hierarchical list structure to group activities under 'Activities beyond original scope' and 'Deeper support within areas of scope'.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/8",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-8",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 4,
          "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
          "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
          "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-e9ecd1635814",
          "evidence": "p4 mandate vs p7-8 expanded scope and BCG's $5M investment frame the gap.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Establish 'do more with less' mandate and BCG's expanded scope",
          "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e0224ad2017b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Cover, objectives, 'BCG hired to do more with less', scope, joint team.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 9,
      "slideType": "table_of_contents",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/9",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-9",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e0224ad2017b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Cover, objectives, 'BCG hired to do more with less', scope, joint team.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 10,
      "slideType": "executive_summary",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide describes a methodology for organizational transformation, focusing on process, IT, structure, and culture.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/10",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-10",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e0224ad2017b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Cover, objectives, 'BCG hired to do more with less', scope, joint team.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 11,
      "slideType": "org_design",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a hierarchical structure to show the integration of BCG and NYCHA personnel in steering, management, and operational roles.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/11",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-11",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e0224ad2017b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Cover, objectives, 'BCG hired to do more with less', scope, joint team.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 12,
      "slideType": "appendix",
      "function": "appendix",
      "notes": "The slide serves as an appendix to document the breadth of stakeholder engagement.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/12",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-12",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e0224ad2017b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Cover, objectives, 'BCG hired to do more with less', scope, joint team.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 13,
      "slideType": "team_bio",
      "function": "other",
      "notes": "The slide lists personnel involved in the NYCHA project, categorized by seniority and role, with specific project phases noted for many individuals.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/13",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-13",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e0224ad2017b",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Cover, objectives, 'BCG hired to do more with less', scope, joint team.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 14,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a central 'Opportunity identification' box fed by six surrounding analytical approaches.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/14",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-14",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 16,
          "from": 14,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-ee09643d2eab",
          "evidence": "p14 'lenses to identify opps' + p16 'Four types of opportunities' presented as MECE.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Lay out the lenses & four opportunity types that structure the engagement",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e587ebad39a3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Lenses to identify opps; '$16B challenges, mutually reinforcing' on p23.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 15,
      "slideType": "appendix_data",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": "The slide uses a diamond-marked matrix to indicate the presence of specific functional departments within different organizations.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/15",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-15",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 16,
          "from": 14,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-ee09643d2eab",
          "evidence": "p14 'lenses to identify opps' + p16 'Four types of opportunities' presented as MECE.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Lay out the lenses & four opportunity types that structure the engagement",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e587ebad39a3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Lenses to identify opps; '$16B challenges, mutually reinforcing' on p23.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 16,
      "slideType": "strategic_options",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "The slide uses a split-column layout with a central arrow to indicate the relationship between opportunity types and value delivery.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/16",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-16",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 16,
          "from": 14,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-ee09643d2eab",
          "evidence": "p14 'lenses to identify opps' + p16 'Four types of opportunities' presented as MECE.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Lay out the lenses & four opportunity types that structure the engagement",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e587ebad39a3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Lenses to identify opps; '$16B challenges, mutually reinforcing' on p23.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 17,
      "slideType": "client_example",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a swimlane-style process map to visualize the applicant journey and identify bottlenecks.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/17",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-17",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 17,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-f2d69ce24c40",
          "evidence": "Tenant-interview process diagnostic, systems example, org redesign, HR sizing, HR maturity ladder.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Illustrate each opportunity type with a worked example",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e587ebad39a3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Lenses to identify opps; '$16B challenges, mutually reinforcing' on p23.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 18,
      "slideType": "market_landscape",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The diagram uses a color-coded legend to categorize IT systems based on performance and issue status.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/18",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-18",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 17,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-f2d69ce24c40",
          "evidence": "Tenant-interview process diagnostic, systems example, org redesign, HR sizing, HR maturity ladder.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Illustrate each opportunity type with a worked example",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e587ebad39a3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Lenses to identify opps; '$16B challenges, mutually reinforcing' on p23.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 19,
      "slideType": "org_design",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "The slide uses organizational charts to demonstrate the removal of management layers.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/19",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-19",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 17,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-f2d69ce24c40",
          "evidence": "Tenant-interview process diagnostic, systems example, org redesign, HR sizing, HR maturity ladder.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Illustrate each opportunity type with a worked example",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e587ebad39a3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Lenses to identify opps; '$16B challenges, mutually reinforcing' on p23.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 20,
      "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": "The chart uses a box-plot style visualization to show 25th, median, and 75th percentiles for HR FTE ratios across industries.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/20",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-20",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 17,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-f2d69ce24c40",
          "evidence": "Tenant-interview process diagnostic, systems example, org redesign, HR sizing, HR maturity ladder.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Illustrate each opportunity type with a worked example",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e587ebad39a3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Lenses to identify opps; '$16B challenges, mutually reinforcing' on p23.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 21,
      "slideType": "maturity_model",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a stepped progression framework to categorize HR activities by their strategic impact.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/21",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-21",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 17,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-f2d69ce24c40",
          "evidence": "Tenant-interview process diagnostic, systems example, org redesign, HR sizing, HR maturity ladder.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Illustrate each opportunity type with a worked example",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e587ebad39a3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Lenses to identify opps; '$16B challenges, mutually reinforcing' on p23.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 22,
      "slideType": "table_of_contents",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/22",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-22",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e587ebad39a3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Lenses to identify opps; '$16B challenges, mutually reinforcing' on p23.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}