{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 54, "pageSize": 60, "pageCount": 5333, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76", "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d", "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/u8nwH1Xd3AcydRWUBy9dB60cfk6PpIVOlkKZZNpYch8/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9lMTc3MmE1MzZhYzBmYjBkL3AwMDEuanBn", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-1", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a649f8adf4db", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, intro, exec summary, sector boundaries, agenda", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/yFPH13JB3ARe27N_3gXpUOt88fJBQXxqI7pQ61wM2X4/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9lMTc3MmE1MzZhYzBmYjBkL3AwMDEucG5n", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/W9KcbhS69vABeIDq9bcwlUVkWKNjn6eHc2q3ZFW8O2c/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9lMTc3MmE1MzZhYzBmYjBkL3AwMDEuanBn", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/gkQlgtwghwoj1RFeFVAd9r8fusDWDPKd5ANNkKPXwHM/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9lMTc3MmE1MzZhYzBmYjBkL3AwMDEucG5n" }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76", "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d", "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide serves as a front-matter introduction to a BCG report on NYC media.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-2", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a649f8adf4db", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, intro, exec summary, sector boundaries, agenda", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76", "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d", "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list format to structure key findings about the NYC media industry.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-3", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a649f8adf4db", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, intro, exec summary, sector boundaries, agenda", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76", "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d", "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a column-based categorization to define scope boundaries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-4", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a649f8adf4db", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, intro, exec summary, sector boundaries, agenda", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "BCG slide from 2008 regarding the LA Harbor Commission.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 7, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-abec01fab6a7", "evidence": "Numbered 5-element list, interaction diagram, then truck/driver market sizing.", "position": 3, "objective": "Decompose CTP into five interlocking elements plus market sizing", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a07bf07db208", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Five CTP elements, interactions, labor market, three options defined.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The diagram uses a system dynamics approach to show how policy levers (ban, fee, financing) impact truck supply and driver availability.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 7, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-abec01fab6a7", "evidence": "Numbered 5-element list, interaction diagram, then truck/driver market sizing.", "position": 3, "objective": "Decompose CTP into five interlocking elements plus market sizing", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a07bf07db208", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Five CTP elements, interactions, labor market, three options defined.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "market_sizing", "function": "size_opportunity", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall-style approach to represent labor supply segments, commonly referred to as a 'supply stack' in labor economics.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 7, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-abec01fab6a7", "evidence": "Numbered 5-element list, interaction diagram, then truck/driver market sizing.", "position": 3, "objective": "Decompose CTP into five interlocking elements plus market sizing", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a07bf07db208", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Five CTP elements, interactions, labor market, three options defined.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix structure to compare three distinct policy models (Basic, Enhanced, Enhanced with employee commitment).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-adba23b8c08f", "evidence": "Side-by-side option matrix then narrative slides on Option II rationale and Option III stretch.", "position": 4, "objective": "Define and contrast Options I/II/III as a decision fork", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 86, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a07bf07db208", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Five CTP elements, interactions, labor market, three options defined.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-adba23b8c08f", "evidence": "Side-by-side option matrix then narrative slides on Option II rationale and Option III stretch.", "position": 4, "objective": "Define and contrast Options I/II/III as a decision fork", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 86, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a07bf07db208", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Five CTP elements, interactions, labor market, three options defined.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "present_solution", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-adba23b8c08f", "evidence": "Side-by-side option matrix then narrative slides on Option II rationale and Option III stretch.", "position": 4, "objective": "Define and contrast Options I/II/III as a decision fork", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 86, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a07bf07db208", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Five CTP elements, interactions, labor market, three options defined.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a series of line charts to compare three options (I, II, III) across four dimensions: environmental impact, labor supply, market structure, and costs.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 13, "name": "Risk Reward Plot", "slug": "46-risk-reward-plot", "bestFor": "Investment decisions, project prioritization, strategic bets", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-b2457136824b", "evidence": "Quant model output -> benefits/risks per horizon -> Harvey-ball verdict naming Option III.", "position": 5, "objective": "Compare options on risk vs reward across short and long term to pick Option III", "structure": "The Options -> Risk Assessment -> Reward Assessment -> The Optimal Choice", "confidence": 84, "description": "Evaluate options by plotting risk against potential reward" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a5668e465f0e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Analytical model output, benefits/risks matrix, Harvey-ball scorecard.", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses color coding (green for benefits, red for risks) to distinguish between positive and negative outcomes for each option.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 13, "name": "Risk Reward Plot", "slug": "46-risk-reward-plot", "bestFor": "Investment decisions, project prioritization, strategic bets", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-b2457136824b", "evidence": "Quant model output -> benefits/risks per horizon -> Harvey-ball verdict naming Option III.", "position": 5, "objective": "Compare options on risk vs reward across short and long term to pick Option III", "structure": "The Options -> Risk Assessment -> Reward Assessment -> The Optimal Choice", "confidence": 84, "description": "Evaluate options by plotting risk against potential reward" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a5668e465f0e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Analytical model output, benefits/risks matrix, Harvey-ball scorecard.", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "Uses a qualitative pie-chart visual to represent performance levels (Worse to Better).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 13, "name": "Risk Reward Plot", "slug": "46-risk-reward-plot", "bestFor": "Investment decisions, project prioritization, strategic bets", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-b2457136824b", "evidence": "Quant model output -> benefits/risks per horizon -> Harvey-ball verdict naming Option III.", "position": 5, "objective": "Compare options on risk vs reward across short and long term to pick Option III", "structure": "The Options -> Risk Assessment -> Reward Assessment -> The Optimal Choice", "confidence": 84, "description": "Evaluate options by plotting risk against potential reward" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a5668e465f0e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Analytical model output, benefits/risks matrix, Harvey-ball scorecard.", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 16, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b6add3d20d5c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Option III chosen; unified-approach recommendation.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide evaluates three options for a drayage market program, concluding that a unified approach between the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles is necessary.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-16", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a943e317302a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Six-point conclusion recommending Option III and unified approach.", "position": 5, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 16, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b6add3d20d5c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Option III chosen; unified-approach recommendation.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "agenda", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-17", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list format to present strategic levers alongside their implementation details and justifications.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 18, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-b61b323b14e8", "evidence": "Option I baseline, Option II 'Blue = adjustment from Option I', Option III 'Red = adjustment from Option II'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Detail options additively: base plan, then incentives, then employee commitment", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a table structure to map specific policy levers to their rationales, with numbered categories (1, 4, 5) indicating their place in a broader framework.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 18, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-b61b323b14e8", "evidence": "Option I baseline, Option II 'Blue = adjustment from Option I', Option III 'Red = adjustment from Option II'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Detail options additively: base plan, then incentives, then employee commitment", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a table structure to define the mechanics of a policy option. Red text indicates changes from a previous option.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 18, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-b61b323b14e8", "evidence": "Option I baseline, Option II 'Blue = adjustment from Option I', Option III 'Red = adjustment from Option II'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Detail options additively: base plan, then incentives, then employee commitment", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This is a bibliography/reference slide.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-21", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/opeSlI6uEfZ7CNX9HcuKHHx-1RsFSOWJJZO5PEfdL8Q/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iODc3MTgyNzZkMmU4ZWY4L3AwMDEuanBn", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-1", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6469ee183b79", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, objectives, approach, mail segmentation methodology", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/zGc-KbarAvy6pjSHN_6ntqJYxv9QcZJ_ixWGEAy_cu8/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iODc3MTgyNzZkMmU4ZWY4L3AwMDEucG5n", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/7e2O0MENOCvyS3I3wmtgjwSaz7jXA2zaatmRRcyhDWw/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iODc3MTgyNzZkMmU4ZWY4L3AwMDEuanBn", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/ykvWCgkiYVb-Byl1Itg2ZiKbpNk4aFYjSJNdqsLAkU8/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iODc3MTgyNzZkMmU4ZWY4L3AwMDEucG5n" }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-2", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6469ee183b79", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, objectives, approach, mail segmentation methodology", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "situation_overview", "function": "establish_context", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-823083bd233c", "evidence": "p5 splits all mail into First-Class vs Standard subcategories; p6 forecasts each segment", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish methodology by segmenting mail into MECE categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6469ee183b79", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, objectives, approach, mail segmentation methodology", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-823083bd233c", "evidence": "p5 splits all mail into First-Class vs Standard subcategories; p6 forecasts each segment", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish methodology by segmenting mail into MECE categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6469ee183b79", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, objectives, approach, mail segmentation methodology", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "segmentation", "function": "decompose_segments", "notes": "The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast First-Class Mail and Standard Mail, with visual examples for each sub-segment.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-823083bd233c", "evidence": "p5 splits all mail into First-Class vs Standard subcategories; p6 forecasts each segment", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish methodology by segmenting mail into MECE categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6469ee183b79", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, objectives, approach, mail segmentation methodology", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "market_sizing", "function": "size_opportunity", "notes": "The chart uses a Marimekko (mosaic) plot to visualize volume distribution across multiple categorical dimensions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-823083bd233c", "evidence": "p5 splits all mail into First-Class vs Standard subcategories; p6 forecasts each segment", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish methodology by segmenting mail into MECE categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6469ee183b79", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, objectives, approach, mail segmentation methodology", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-7", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a BCG-branded background. It highlights a -1.5% annual decline rate.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Uses green arrows for positive trends and red arrows for negative trends for USPS.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a dual-line forecast (Sender vs Consumer perspective) and compares it against a worst-case EU benchmark.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart shows a sharp decline after 2008 and projects three distinct recovery paths through 2020.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a Marimekko (mosaic) layout to show volume distribution across segments and sender types.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "testimonial", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a dark green background typical of BCG decks. It presents qualitative evidence to support a quantitative trend.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 15, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-8a4d57c193f9", "evidence": "Section explicitly titled 'Benchmarks from other global posts'; p17 plots CAGR vs broadband across countries", "position": 3, "objective": "Validate decline thesis using peer-post benchmarks", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a dual-chart layout to demonstrate a causal link between broadband adoption and mail volume decline across multiple countries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 15, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-8a4d57c193f9", "evidence": "Section explicitly titled 'Benchmarks from other global posts'; p17 plots CAGR vs broadband across countries", "position": 3, "objective": "Validate decline thesis using peer-post benchmarks", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a regression line with an R-squared value of 0.57 to illustrate the relationship.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 15, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-8a4d57c193f9", "evidence": "Section explicitly titled 'Benchmarks from other global posts'; p17 plots CAGR vs broadband across countries", "position": 3, "objective": "Validate decline thesis using peer-post benchmarks", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-18", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 21, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-7d013d49ef95", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Implications section: revenue gap, scenarios, external events", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a dark green background typical of BCG decks. It includes a specific callout for the -44% change in First-Class Mail revenue.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 19, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-8fc7077006e7", "evidence": "p20 'All reasonable scenarios suggest volume will continue to decline'; p21 lists external/USPS events", "position": 4, "objective": "Test robustness of decline through revenue gap and scenarios", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 75, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 21, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-7d013d49ef95", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Implications section: revenue gap, scenarios, external events", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The matrix uses a 3x3 grid to show volume outcomes. Callouts provide context for the extreme scenarios (top-right and bottom-left).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 19, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-8fc7077006e7", "evidence": "p20 'All reasonable scenarios suggest volume will continue to decline'; p21 lists external/USPS events", "position": 4, "objective": "Test robustness of decline through revenue gap and scenarios", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 75, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 21, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-7d013d49ef95", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Implications section: revenue gap, scenarios, external events", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "risk_register", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Uses a simple binary classification (positive/negative) for various risk/opportunity factors.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 19, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-8fc7077006e7", "evidence": "p20 'All reasonable scenarios suggest volume will continue to decline'; p21 lists external/USPS events", "position": 4, "objective": "Test robustness of decline through revenue gap and scenarios", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 75, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 21, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-7d013d49ef95", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Implications section: revenue gap, scenarios, external events", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a 2x2-like matrix structure to contrast 'Conventional' vs 'Structural' changes across revenue and cost dimensions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 22, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-90af6e415be9", "evidence": "p22 lists changes 'implemented by other posts'; p23 'Some posts are pursuing these structural changes now'", "position": 5, "objective": "Recommend structural changes by citing peer-post precedent", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 78, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-701645d8b834", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Structural cost changes table; precedent of other posts pursuing them", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 24, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-82072b43dde1", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Structural changes required and path forward", "position": 3, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast implemented changes versus proposed changes in postal delivery frequency and scope.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 22, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-90af6e415be9", "evidence": "p22 lists changes 'implemented by other posts'; p23 'Some posts are pursuing these structural changes now'", "position": 5, "objective": "Recommend structural changes by citing peer-post precedent", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 78, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-701645d8b834", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Structural cost changes table; precedent of other posts pursuing them", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 24, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-82072b43dde1", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Structural changes required and path forward", "position": 3, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "BCG branded slide.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 22, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-90af6e415be9", "evidence": "p22 lists changes 'implemented by other posts'; p23 'Some posts are pursuing these structural changes now'", "position": 5, "objective": "Recommend structural changes by citing peer-post precedent", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 78, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-76379a0c6dd6", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "'The path forward' slide enumerates required structural changes", "position": 5, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 24, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-82072b43dde1", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Structural changes required and path forward", "position": 3, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-25", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart illustrates the net impact of growth factors (Mail rebound, Organic growth) and diversion factors (Autopay, Online/Mobile presentment) on total volume.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 26, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9676532edd11", "evidence": "p28 confirmed waterfall (8.5B → 4.5B with named drivers); other sender-view segments follow same pattern", "position": 6, "objective": "Decompose each sender-side segment's volume change via waterfall drivers", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart shows a starting volume of 14.4B in 2009 and an ending volume of 11.0B in 2020, with various positive and negative drivers in between.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 26, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9676532edd11", "evidence": "p28 confirmed waterfall (8.5B → 4.5B with named drivers); other sender-view segments follow same pattern", "position": 6, "objective": "Decompose each sender-side segment's volume change via waterfall drivers", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart shows a net decrease from 8.5B to 4.5B, with various positive and negative drivers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 26, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9676532edd11", "evidence": "p28 confirmed waterfall (8.5B → 4.5B with named drivers); other sender-view segments follow same pattern", "position": 6, "objective": "Decompose each sender-side segment's volume change via waterfall drivers", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall structure to show how various factors (Mail rebound, Organic growth, Autopay, etc.) contribute to the net change in payment volume.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 26, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9676532edd11", "evidence": "p28 confirmed waterfall (8.5B → 4.5B with named drivers); other sender-view segments follow same pattern", "position": 6, "objective": "Decompose each sender-side segment's volume change via waterfall drivers", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart shows a net decrease from 11.4B to 8.0B units, with positive drivers (rebound, growth, targeting) and negative drivers (shift to standard, online, email).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-30", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 26, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9676532edd11", "evidence": "p28 confirmed waterfall (8.5B → 4.5B with named drivers); other sender-view segments follow same pattern", "position": 6, "objective": "Decompose each sender-side segment's volume change via waterfall drivers", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart illustrates a bridge from 32.1B to 38.0B units.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-31", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 26, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9676532edd11", "evidence": "p28 confirmed waterfall (8.5B → 4.5B with named drivers); other sender-view segments follow same pattern", "position": 6, "objective": "Decompose each sender-side segment's volume change via waterfall drivers", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart illustrates a bridge from 2009 volume to 2020 volume, highlighting specific growth and decline drivers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-32", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 26, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9676532edd11", "evidence": "p28 confirmed waterfall (8.5B → 4.5B with named drivers); other sender-view segments follow same pattern", "position": 6, "objective": "Decompose each sender-side segment's volume change via waterfall drivers", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart illustrates how various factors (rebound, growth, online, targeting, mobile, TV) contribute to the net change in volume.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-33", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 26, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9676532edd11", "evidence": "p28 confirmed waterfall (8.5B → 4.5B with named drivers); other sender-view segments follow same pattern", "position": 6, "objective": "Decompose each sender-side segment's volume change via waterfall drivers", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 34, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/34", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-34", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 35, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "Uses Harvey balls to represent improvement scores for various online service features.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/35", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-35", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 41, "from": 35, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9ac6075e827c", "evidence": "Each slide framed as 'Consumers expect volume of X to fall' across mail categories", "position": 7, "objective": "Triangulate sender forecasts with consumer expectations", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 82, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 36, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "Uses Harvey balls to represent scores for various service improvements.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/36", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-36", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 41, "from": 35, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9ac6075e827c", "evidence": "Each slide framed as 'Consumers expect volume of X to fall' across mail categories", "position": 7, "objective": "Triangulate sender forecasts with consumer expectations", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 82, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 37, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "Uses Harvey balls to represent survey scores for service improvements.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/37", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-37", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 41, "from": 35, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9ac6075e827c", "evidence": "Each slide framed as 'Consumers expect volume of X to fall' across mail categories", "position": 7, "objective": "Triangulate sender forecasts with consumer expectations", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 82, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 38, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for online ad improvements.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/38", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-38", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 41, "from": 35, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9ac6075e827c", "evidence": "Each slide framed as 'Consumers expect volume of X to fall' across mail categories", "position": 7, "objective": "Triangulate sender forecasts with consumer expectations", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 82, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 39, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for online advertising improvements.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/39", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-39", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 41, "from": 35, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9ac6075e827c", "evidence": "Each slide framed as 'Consumers expect volume of X to fall' across mail categories", "position": 7, "objective": "Triangulate sender forecasts with consumer expectations", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 82, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 40, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for online advertising improvements.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/40", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-40", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 41, "from": 35, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9ac6075e827c", "evidence": "Each slide framed as 'Consumers expect volume of X to fall' across mail categories", "position": 7, "objective": "Triangulate sender forecasts with consumer expectations", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 82, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 41, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a grouped bar chart format to compare two categories (bill received in mail vs online) across seven segments of internet experience.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/41", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-41", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 41, "from": 35, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9ac6075e827c", "evidence": "Each slide framed as 'Consumers expect volume of X to fall' across mail categories", "position": 7, "objective": "Triangulate sender forecasts with consumer expectations", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 82, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }