{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 524, "pageSize": 30, "pageCount": 10666, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide is an embedded image within a larger document, likely a report or legal filing.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": "This page appears to be an excerpt from a legal or investigative report, containing footnotes and narrative text.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This slide is a text-heavy disclosure page from a report, likely a congressional or investigative document.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, containing narrative text and extensive footnotes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, likely an appendix or supporting evidence section.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or committee document, given the footnote citations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document, containing narrative text and footnotes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-30", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide includes an excerpt from an email sent by McKinsey partners to a client, highlighting their strategy to win business.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-31", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This page appears to be from a legal or investigative report, containing numbered footnotes referencing internal documents.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-32", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "client_example", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide is embedded within a larger document; the red oval is an annotation from the document author, not the original slide.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-33", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 34, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, not a standard consulting deck slide.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/34", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-34", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 35, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Page 35 of a larger document, containing extensive footnotes citing legal and journalistic sources.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/35", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-35", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 36, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": "This is a text-heavy page from a report or legal document, likely an appendix or supporting evidence page.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/36", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-36", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 37, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This is a page from a legal or investigative report, containing footnotes and legal citations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/37", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-37", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 38, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This is a page from a formal investigative report, likely a Congressional committee report.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/38", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-38", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 39, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This is a page from a formal report or legal document, likely a congressional or investigative committee report.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/39", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-39", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 40, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/40", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-40", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 41, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document, containing footnotes and an email excerpt.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/41", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-41", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 42, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document, indicated by the footnote citations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/42", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-42", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 43, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "This slide appears to be from a report or legal document detailing McKinsey's involvement with Purdue Pharma, specifically focusing on the 'ADF Strategy'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/43", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-43", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 44, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide contains a pull-quote highlighting the core strategy and detailed footnotes citing internal McKinsey documents and external reports.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/44", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-44", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 45, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This slide appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, containing narrative text and footnotes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/45", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-45", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 46, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a legal or investigative report (indicated by footnotes and redacted text).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/46", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-46", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 47, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document, given the footnote style and content.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/47", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-47", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 48, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This page contains footnotes 229-236.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/48", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-48", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 49, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, indicated by the footnote numbering and page number at the bottom.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/49", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-49", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 50, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a congressional or investigative report (page 50).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/50", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-50", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 51, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "This page contains footnotes referencing specific internal documents (MCK-HCOR codes) and news articles.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/51", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-51", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 52, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Page 52 of a report, likely a congressional or investigative document.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/52", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-52", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }