{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 450, "pageSize": 30, "pageCount": 10666, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide sets the context for a study on utility sector efficiency beyond the 3.3 billion DKK political agreement.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-3", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "0d6b8e86-17b4-4dd4-b73c-4cdb3db23a84", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "The document provides an overview of the sector and its challenges.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "agenda", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-4", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "0d6b8e86-17b4-4dd4-b73c-4cdb3db23a84", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "The document provides an overview of the sector and its challenges.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "table_of_contents", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-5", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "0d6b8e86-17b4-4dd4-b73c-4cdb3db23a84", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "The document provides an overview of the sector and its challenges.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide outlines the rationale for a 7.1 billion DKK efficiency potential, citing sector fragmentation, regulatory shortcomings, and investment inefficiencies.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608", "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.", "position": 0, "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide outlines a 3-point plan for utility sector reform including economic regulation, consolidation incentives, and governance improvements.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608", "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.", "position": 0, "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide explains the methodology behind the prudence adjustment (best-of-two approach) and lists factors that could increase the potential.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608", "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.", "position": 0, "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "Uses a maturity model framework to map utility sectors (waste, gas, electricity, district heating, water) against regulatory regimes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608", "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.", "position": 0, "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "next_steps", "function": "state_next_steps", "notes": "The slide is labeled 'KONKLUSION' (Conclusion) but functions as a list of future research/next steps.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608", "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.", "position": 0, "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "table_of_contents", "function": "front_matter", "notes": "The document is in Danish.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608", "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.", "position": 0, "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall chart to illustrate the additive nature of the two potential sources.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608", "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.", "position": 0, "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart compares historical data with 2014-based updated analysis, highlighting a 14.8% increase in total potential.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608", "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.", "position": 0, "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide compares a range-based previous estimate (1.3-2.9 DKK bn) with a specific 2.3 DKK bn updated estimate, broken down by sector.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608", "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.", "position": 0, "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to bridge 2014 baseline data to 2025 potential, accounting for asset lifespans and productivity growth.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608", "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.", "position": 0, "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to reconcile different efficiency potential estimates. It includes a specific callout box explaining the Malmquist index components (technological progress vs. individual catch-up).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608", "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.", "position": 0, "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall chart to illustrate the components of efficiency potential (Direct, Consolidation, and Additional/Dynamic).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608", "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.", "position": 0, "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "table_of_contents", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608", "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.", "position": 0, "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix to show which barriers apply to which utility sectors (water, wastewater, heating, electricity, gas, waste incineration).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608", "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.", "position": 0, "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a table to map sectors to specific regulatory or structural barriers and their negative impacts on incentives.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608", "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.", "position": 0, "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "table_of_contents", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "fafb0b55-a09c-4623-a52d-6c1b1da5e89e", "evidence": "The document uses the golden circle framework to present its findings.", "position": 1, "objective": "To provide evidence and proof of the potential for efficiency improvements.", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "beatId": "d6c3814c-1c1c-4dc2-8130-08fdc142df8a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents data and case studies to support its findings.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a checkmark system to denote essential vs supporting initiatives, with numbered footnotes indicating specific sector-level nuances.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "fafb0b55-a09c-4623-a52d-6c1b1da5e89e", "evidence": "The document uses the golden circle framework to present its findings.", "position": 1, "objective": "To provide evidence and proof of the potential for efficiency improvements.", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "beatId": "d6c3814c-1c1c-4dc2-8130-08fdc142df8a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents data and case studies to support its findings.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix structure to categorize 15 distinct initiatives across 5 sectors plus cross-sector initiatives.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "fafb0b55-a09c-4623-a52d-6c1b1da5e89e", "evidence": "The document uses the golden circle framework to present its findings.", "position": 1, "objective": "To provide evidence and proof of the potential for efficiency improvements.", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "beatId": "d6c3814c-1c1c-4dc2-8130-08fdc142df8a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents data and case studies to support its findings.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a structured approach to evaluate a regulatory initiative, balancing benefits and risks while listing technical requirements.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "fafb0b55-a09c-4623-a52d-6c1b1da5e89e", "evidence": "The document uses the golden circle framework to present its findings.", "position": 1, "objective": "To provide evidence and proof of the potential for efficiency improvements.", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "beatId": "d6c3814c-1c1c-4dc2-8130-08fdc142df8a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents data and case studies to support its findings.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a structured approach to evaluate a regulatory initiative, including a callout for an expert committee (WACC-udvalget).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "fafb0b55-a09c-4623-a52d-6c1b1da5e89e", "evidence": "The document uses the golden circle framework to present its findings.", "position": 1, "objective": "To provide evidence and proof of the potential for efficiency improvements.", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "beatId": "d6c3814c-1c1c-4dc2-8130-08fdc142df8a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents data and case studies to support its findings.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a structured approach to evaluate a policy initiative, contrasting pros/cons with implementation requirements.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "fafb0b55-a09c-4623-a52d-6c1b1da5e89e", "evidence": "The document uses the golden circle framework to present its findings.", "position": 1, "objective": "To provide evidence and proof of the potential for efficiency improvements.", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "beatId": "d6c3814c-1c1c-4dc2-8130-08fdc142df8a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents data and case studies to support its findings.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "Initiative 3 in a series.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "fafb0b55-a09c-4623-a52d-6c1b1da5e89e", "evidence": "The document uses the golden circle framework to present its findings.", "position": 1, "objective": "To provide evidence and proof of the potential for efficiency improvements.", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "beatId": "d6c3814c-1c1c-4dc2-8130-08fdc142df8a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents data and case studies to support its findings.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide outlines a specific initiative (number 4) regarding board composition in the utility sector, detailing the problem, benefits, drawbacks, and prerequisites.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "fafb0b55-a09c-4623-a52d-6c1b1da5e89e", "evidence": "The document uses the golden circle framework to present its findings.", "position": 1, "objective": "To provide evidence and proof of the potential for efficiency improvements.", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "beatId": "d6c3814c-1c1c-4dc2-8130-08fdc142df8a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents data and case studies to support its findings.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "recommend", "notes": "The slide outlines the benefits, potential drawbacks, and regulatory prerequisites for corporatizing municipal utility services.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "fafb0b55-a09c-4623-a52d-6c1b1da5e89e", "evidence": "The document uses the golden circle framework to present its findings.", "position": 1, "objective": "To provide evidence and proof of the potential for efficiency improvements.", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "beatId": "d6c3814c-1c1c-4dc2-8130-08fdc142df8a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents data and case studies to support its findings.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a structured approach to evaluate a specific regulatory initiative.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-30", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "fafb0b55-a09c-4623-a52d-6c1b1da5e89e", "evidence": "The document uses the golden circle framework to present its findings.", "position": 1, "objective": "To provide evidence and proof of the potential for efficiency improvements.", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "beatId": "d6c3814c-1c1c-4dc2-8130-08fdc142df8a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents data and case studies to support its findings.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide outlines the rationale, benefits, potential drawbacks, and regulatory prerequisites for this incentive mechanism.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-31", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "fafb0b55-a09c-4623-a52d-6c1b1da5e89e", "evidence": "The document uses the golden circle framework to present its findings.", "position": 1, "objective": "To provide evidence and proof of the potential for efficiency improvements.", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "beatId": "d6c3814c-1c1c-4dc2-8130-08fdc142df8a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents data and case studies to support its findings.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "recommend", "notes": "Part of a series of initiatives (labeled '8').", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-32", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "fafb0b55-a09c-4623-a52d-6c1b1da5e89e", "evidence": "The document uses the golden circle framework to present its findings.", "position": 1, "objective": "To provide evidence and proof of the potential for efficiency improvements.", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 21, "beatId": "d6c3814c-1c1c-4dc2-8130-08fdc142df8a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents data and case studies to support its findings.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }