{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 425, "pageSize": 60, "pageCount": 5333, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": "Includes logos for WWF, Plastic Free Foundation, and Ipsos.", "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/IDxIIZ1fQe__6W2ihFM7abIDnH1YdzZFWTq6_Mmhg4c/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9mYTI1YjAzNmQwNDdmZmY2L3AwMDEuanBn", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-1", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/hZ57a_eNxUAU4i-58Z2zDHwZ5CfwuLT0X-d2dNVyq00/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9mYTI1YjAzNmQwNDdmZmY2L3AwMDEucG5n", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/Cp99xnEgJEvK33oVB-uc2THlwSmPX91YBqP7wMhFGH0/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9mYTI1YjAzNmQwNDdmZmY2L3AwMDEuanBn", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/_DC1idtcK4agvyvn6J1j0UzaS0G2mqneTbZVkP2uABw/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9mYTI1YjAzNmQwNDdmZmY2L3AwMDEucG5n" }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "situation_overview", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a chronological timeline structure to summarize the history of the research project.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-2", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 2, "beatId": "3295fa2a-20ed-4dab-a6cf-2edfb2bb2016", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Provides research context and overview of the situation (p2-p5)", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide presents four key metrics as big numbers with supporting icons and text.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-3", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 2, "beatId": "3295fa2a-20ed-4dab-a6cf-2edfb2bb2016", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Provides research context and overview of the situation (p2-p5)", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Data from Ipsos Global Advisor survey of 23,029 adults across 34 countries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-4", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 2, "beatId": "3295fa2a-20ed-4dab-a6cf-2edfb2bb2016", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Provides research context and overview of the situation (p2-p5)", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Two stacked bar charts showing agreement levels and importance ratings for various plastic treaty measures.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-5", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 2, "beatId": "3295fa2a-20ed-4dab-a6cf-2edfb2bb2016", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Provides research context and overview of the situation (p2-p5)", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "e457910d-b9ea-4a44-9243-5edb8f4be7fa", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the comparison tables and peer benchmarks that outline global preferences (p6-p15)", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the global preferences for a plastic pollution treaty?", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "a47e8cc9-beb9-4df9-b72f-989b5a580ed8", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Outlines global preferences for an international plastic pollution treaty and views on specific rules (p6-p15)", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart shows a high level of global consensus, with 73% agreement on average.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "e457910d-b9ea-4a44-9243-5edb8f4be7fa", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the comparison tables and peer benchmarks that outline global preferences (p6-p15)", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the global preferences for a plastic pollution treaty?", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "a47e8cc9-beb9-4df9-b72f-989b5a580ed8", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Outlines global preferences for an international plastic pollution treaty and views on specific rules (p6-p15)", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to show the distribution of agreement levels across different regions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "e457910d-b9ea-4a44-9243-5edb8f4be7fa", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the comparison tables and peer benchmarks that outline global preferences (p6-p15)", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the global preferences for a plastic pollution treaty?", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "a47e8cc9-beb9-4df9-b72f-989b5a580ed8", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Outlines global preferences for an international plastic pollution treaty and views on specific rules (p6-p15)", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart displays percentages for 'Strongly agree', 'Agree', 'Neither agree nor disagree', 'Disagree/Strongly disagree', and 'Don't know'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "e457910d-b9ea-4a44-9243-5edb8f4be7fa", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the comparison tables and peer benchmarks that outline global preferences (p6-p15)", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the global preferences for a plastic pollution treaty?", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "a47e8cc9-beb9-4df9-b72f-989b5a580ed8", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Outlines global preferences for an international plastic pollution treaty and views on specific rules (p6-p15)", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart shows a stacked bar representation of survey responses ranging from 'Strongly agree' to 'Don't know'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "e457910d-b9ea-4a44-9243-5edb8f4be7fa", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the comparison tables and peer benchmarks that outline global preferences (p6-p15)", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the global preferences for a plastic pollution treaty?", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "a47e8cc9-beb9-4df9-b72f-989b5a580ed8", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Outlines global preferences for an international plastic pollution treaty and views on specific rules (p6-p15)", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart shows a high level of global consensus, with 68% of respondents agreeing.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "e457910d-b9ea-4a44-9243-5edb8f4be7fa", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the comparison tables and peer benchmarks that outline global preferences (p6-p15)", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the global preferences for a plastic pollution treaty?", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "a47e8cc9-beb9-4df9-b72f-989b5a580ed8", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Outlines global preferences for an international plastic pollution treaty and views on specific rules (p6-p15)", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show the distribution of agreement levels across different global regions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "e457910d-b9ea-4a44-9243-5edb8f4be7fa", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the comparison tables and peer benchmarks that outline global preferences (p6-p15)", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the global preferences for a plastic pollution treaty?", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "a47e8cc9-beb9-4df9-b72f-989b5a580ed8", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Outlines global preferences for an international plastic pollution treaty and views on specific rules (p6-p15)", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart displays the percentage of respondents who strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree/strongly disagree, or don't know.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "e457910d-b9ea-4a44-9243-5edb8f4be7fa", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the comparison tables and peer benchmarks that outline global preferences (p6-p15)", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the global preferences for a plastic pollution treaty?", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "a47e8cc9-beb9-4df9-b72f-989b5a580ed8", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Outlines global preferences for an international plastic pollution treaty and views on specific rules (p6-p15)", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart displays survey results across 7 regional/grouping categories with a 5-point Likert scale.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "e457910d-b9ea-4a44-9243-5edb8f4be7fa", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the comparison tables and peer benchmarks that outline global preferences (p6-p15)", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the global preferences for a plastic pollution treaty?", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "a47e8cc9-beb9-4df9-b72f-989b5a580ed8", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Outlines global preferences for an international plastic pollution treaty and views on specific rules (p6-p15)", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "e457910d-b9ea-4a44-9243-5edb8f4be7fa", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the comparison tables and peer benchmarks that outline global preferences (p6-p15)", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the global preferences for a plastic pollution treaty?", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "a47e8cc9-beb9-4df9-b72f-989b5a580ed8", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Outlines global preferences for an international plastic pollution treaty and views on specific rules (p6-p15)", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Data source: Ipsos Global Advisor. Survey of 24,727 online adults aged 16-74 in 32 countries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to represent survey responses ranging from 'Essential' to 'Don't know'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart shows a high level of global consensus, with 85% of respondents viewing such bans as important.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Data represents a survey of 24,727 online adults across 32 countries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart shows a high level of global consensus, with 90% of respondents viewing the ban as important.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart displays survey data across 7 regional/grouping categories with a 6-point sentiment scale.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Data source: Ipsos Global Advisor. Survey of 24,727 online adults aged 16-74.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to represent survey responses ranging from 'Essential' to 'Don't know'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart shows a high level of global consensus on the importance of re-use and refill systems, with most countries showing over 80% support.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show the distribution of sentiment across different regions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Data source: Ipsos Global Advisor. Survey of 24,727 online adults aged 16-74 in 32 countries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart displays survey data across 7 regional/grouping categories with a 6-point Likert scale.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Data source: Ipsos Global Advisor. Base: 24,727 online adults aged 16-74 in 32 countries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "bb53f066-1d59-4c36-a2ee-90840ba19e4c", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the discussion of specific requirements and support for them (p28-p31)", "position": 2, "objective": "How do citizens view specific requirements for plastic producers and manufacturers?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "beatId": "37247f22-c61b-4f80-b119-92fc4537fbab", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Discusses specific requirements for manufacturers, retailers, and plastic producers (p28-p31)", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart displays survey results across 7 regions/groupings, showing the percentage breakdown of sentiment from 'Essential' to 'Don't know'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "bb53f066-1d59-4c36-a2ee-90840ba19e4c", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the discussion of specific requirements and support for them (p28-p31)", "position": 2, "objective": "How do citizens view specific requirements for plastic producers and manufacturers?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "beatId": "37247f22-c61b-4f80-b119-92fc4537fbab", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Discusses specific requirements for manufacturers, retailers, and plastic producers (p28-p31)", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart shows a high level of global consensus on the importance of manufacturer-funded waste management.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-30", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "bb53f066-1d59-4c36-a2ee-90840ba19e4c", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the discussion of specific requirements and support for them (p28-p31)", "position": 2, "objective": "How do citizens view specific requirements for plastic producers and manufacturers?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "beatId": "37247f22-c61b-4f80-b119-92fc4537fbab", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Discusses specific requirements for manufacturers, retailers, and plastic producers (p28-p31)", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to represent survey responses across 7 regional categories.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-31", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "bb53f066-1d59-4c36-a2ee-90840ba19e4c", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the discussion of specific requirements and support for them (p28-p31)", "position": 2, "objective": "How do citizens view specific requirements for plastic producers and manufacturers?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "beatId": "37247f22-c61b-4f80-b119-92fc4537fbab", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Discusses specific requirements for manufacturers, retailers, and plastic producers (p28-p31)", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "appendix", "notes": "Standard Ipsos methodology disclosure slide.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-32", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "appendix", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Standard corporate profile slide.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-33", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/tyMkiz4HaF4ekMnHjrx_t3sqZYxY1NU2gjQMKiTYdlc/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy82ZmY3YTYyNzAwZTM1ZThkL3AwMDEuanBn", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-1", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "791d7ed2-2e35-473a-a79d-2b84e344940b", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Problem", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-problem", "evidence": "The document starts with an introduction and key findings, setting the stage for the report.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/EToel4blCSKmYkMziVn-1iCFdWOAFwaxR196XaKNwv0/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy82ZmY3YTYyNzAwZTM1ZThkL3AwMDEucG5n", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/SDvK4rFgtzMcC1vYM_37lbWjiLjgWcFrhzAsriduG0M/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy82ZmY3YTYyNzAwZTM1ZThkL3AwMDEuanBn", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/zv8gwizJSEwWpYt3V6SH84gfVEnCKlDzK9JVXLInweM/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy82ZmY3YTYyNzAwZTM1ZThkL3AwMDEucG5n" }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide serves as an introduction to a report, summarizing key findings regarding mental health awareness and public perception of health risks.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-2", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "791d7ed2-2e35-473a-a79d-2b84e344940b", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Problem", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-problem", "evidence": "The document starts with an introduction and key findings, setting the stage for the report.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "table_of_contents", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-3", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "791d7ed2-2e35-473a-a79d-2b84e344940b", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Problem", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-problem", "evidence": "The document starts with an introduction and key findings, setting the stage for the report.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a mix of donut charts, big numbers, and a horizontal bar chart to present survey data.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-4", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "791d7ed2-2e35-473a-a79d-2b84e344940b", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Problem", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-problem", "evidence": "The document starts with an introduction and key findings, setting the stage for the report.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a grid of icons and text blocks to present distinct research findings.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-5", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "791d7ed2-2e35-473a-a79d-2b84e344940b", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Problem", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-problem", "evidence": "The document starts with an introduction and key findings, setting the stage for the report.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Data presented as Global Country Averages from Ipsos Health Service Report 2024.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "5ab965e9-f791-47d1-a541-ce67bb5f10d0", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on various health problems, zooming in on specific issues.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the biggest health problems facing people today?", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 6, "beatId": "9d1571ca-4581-49bf-90cd-443f449f10a9", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Market Size", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-market-size", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on the biggest health problems facing people today.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Data source: Ipsos Health Service Report 2024. Base: 23,667 online adults under 75 across 31 countries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "5ab965e9-f791-47d1-a541-ce67bb5f10d0", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on various health problems, zooming in on specific issues.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the biggest health problems facing people today?", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 6, "beatId": "9d1571ca-4581-49bf-90cd-443f449f10a9", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Market Size", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-market-size", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on the biggest health problems facing people today.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a three-column text layout to present survey findings from 31 countries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "5ab965e9-f791-47d1-a541-ce67bb5f10d0", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on various health problems, zooming in on specific issues.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the biggest health problems facing people today?", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 6, "beatId": "9d1571ca-4581-49bf-90cd-443f449f10a9", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Market Size", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-market-size", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on the biggest health problems facing people today.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses text-heavy analysis to report on survey findings from the Ipsos What Worries the World survey.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "5ab965e9-f791-47d1-a541-ce67bb5f10d0", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on various health problems, zooming in on specific issues.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the biggest health problems facing people today?", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 6, "beatId": "9d1571ca-4581-49bf-90cd-443f449f10a9", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Market Size", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-market-size", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on the biggest health problems facing people today.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a narrative format to present survey findings from the 'What Worries the World' report.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "5ab965e9-f791-47d1-a541-ce67bb5f10d0", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on various health problems, zooming in on specific issues.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the biggest health problems facing people today?", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 6, "beatId": "9d1571ca-4581-49bf-90cd-443f449f10a9", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Market Size", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-market-size", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on the biggest health problems facing people today.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "5ab965e9-f791-47d1-a541-ce67bb5f10d0", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on various health problems, zooming in on specific issues.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the biggest health problems facing people today?", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 11, "beatId": "dc02f11b-c682-4043-80e5-08122ba2083d", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Solution", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and potential solutions.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide highlights a disconnect between healthcare spending and public satisfaction, and notes a specific issue with public perception of cancer risk.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "5ab965e9-f791-47d1-a541-ce67bb5f10d0", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on various health problems, zooming in on specific issues.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the biggest health problems facing people today?", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 11, "beatId": "dc02f11b-c682-4043-80e5-08122ba2083d", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Solution", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and potential solutions.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses ellipses to group countries into 'Under-evaluating', 'Aligned', and 'Over-evaluating' categories based on their perception vs. actual WHO index scores.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "5ab965e9-f791-47d1-a541-ce67bb5f10d0", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on various health problems, zooming in on specific issues.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the biggest health problems facing people today?", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 11, "beatId": "dc02f11b-c682-4043-80e5-08122ba2083d", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Solution", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and potential solutions.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a 2x2-style quadrant analysis to segment countries by spending efficiency (ROI).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "5ab965e9-f791-47d1-a541-ce67bb5f10d0", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on various health problems, zooming in on specific issues.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the biggest health problems facing people today?", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 11, "beatId": "dc02f11b-c682-4043-80e5-08122ba2083d", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Solution", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and potential solutions.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart shows a strong positive correlation between perceived and actual obesity rates, with a diagonal reference line indicating perfect accuracy.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "5ab965e9-f791-47d1-a541-ce67bb5f10d0", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on various health problems, zooming in on specific issues.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the biggest health problems facing people today?", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 11, "beatId": "dc02f11b-c682-4043-80e5-08122ba2083d", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Solution", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and potential solutions.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart shows a lack of correlation between actual cancer incidence rates and public perception of risk.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "635f3053-3d83-41b9-8af8-66f25133dc80", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and the importance of addressing these issues.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not addressing these health problems?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 11, "beatId": "dc02f11b-c682-4043-80e5-08122ba2083d", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Solution", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and potential solutions.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays three categories: More likely (purple), Neither more or less likely (grey), and Less likely (teal).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "635f3053-3d83-41b9-8af8-66f25133dc80", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and the importance of addressing these issues.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not addressing these health problems?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 11, "beatId": "dc02f11b-c682-4043-80e5-08122ba2083d", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Solution", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and potential solutions.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays public perception (the bars) versus actual obesity rates and 2017 estimates in a table format.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "635f3053-3d83-41b9-8af8-66f25133dc80", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and the importance of addressing these issues.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not addressing these health problems?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 11, "beatId": "dc02f11b-c682-4043-80e5-08122ba2083d", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Solution", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and potential solutions.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "635f3053-3d83-41b9-8af8-66f25133dc80", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and the importance of addressing these issues.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not addressing these health problems?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 11, "beatId": "dc02f11b-c682-4043-80e5-08122ba2083d", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Solution", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and potential solutions.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Global Country Average. Base: 23,667 online adults under the age of 75 across 31 countries, interviewed 26 July - 9 August 2024.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "635f3053-3d83-41b9-8af8-66f25133dc80", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and the importance of addressing these issues.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not addressing these health problems?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 11, "beatId": "dc02f11b-c682-4043-80e5-08122ba2083d", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Solution", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and potential solutions.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Data source: Ipsos Health Service Report 2024. Base: 23,667 online adults under the age of 75 across 31 countries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "635f3053-3d83-41b9-8af8-66f25133dc80", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and the importance of addressing these issues.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not addressing these health problems?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 21, "beatId": "b5d1bc75-50b5-4331-9f28-00da0bf89318", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Competition", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-competition", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on access to and quality of healthcare provided.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays current (2023) levels as a bar chart, with historical data (2018-2022) in a table format to the right.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "635f3053-3d83-41b9-8af8-66f25133dc80", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and the importance of addressing these issues.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not addressing these health problems?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 21, "beatId": "b5d1bc75-50b5-4331-9f28-00da0bf89318", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Competition", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-competition", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on access to and quality of healthcare provided.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart shows a consistent upward trend in mental health concern for both genders, with women consistently reporting higher levels than men.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "635f3053-3d83-41b9-8af8-66f25133dc80", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and the importance of addressing these issues.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not addressing these health problems?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 21, "beatId": "b5d1bc75-50b5-4331-9f28-00da0bf89318", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Competition", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-competition", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on access to and quality of healthcare provided.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "docSlug": "6ff7a62700e35e8d", "documentTitle": "IPSOS HEALTH SERVICE REPORT 2024", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays a net positive difference in most countries, indicating women are more likely to identify mental health as a top concern.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1b2ae50e3f36#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "635f3053-3d83-41b9-8af8-66f25133dc80", "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges facing healthcare services and the importance of addressing these issues.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not addressing these health problems?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 21, "beatId": "b5d1bc75-50b5-4331-9f28-00da0bf89318", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Competition", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-competition", "evidence": "The document provides data and trends on access to and quality of healthcare provided.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-12f27173c6f0", "docSlug": "ad89420e83d9cc2b", "documentTitle": "The Anholt-Ipsos Nation Brands Index", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "other", "function": "establish_context", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-12f27173c6f0/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-12f27173c6f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-12f27173c6f0#slide-29", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 29, "beatId": "72c4ab37-07ea-4575-aa0c-6d343e65a83f", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Team", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-team", "evidence": "About Ipsos and About Simon Anholt", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-12f27173c6f0", "docSlug": "ad89420e83d9cc2b", "documentTitle": "The Anholt-Ipsos Nation Brands Index", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "team_bio", "function": "other", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-12f27173c6f0/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-12f27173c6f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-12f27173c6f0#slide-30", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 29, "beatId": "72c4ab37-07ea-4575-aa0c-6d343e65a83f", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Team", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-team", "evidence": "About Ipsos and About Simon Anholt", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-12f27173c6f0", "docSlug": "ad89420e83d9cc2b", "documentTitle": "The Anholt-Ipsos Nation Brands Index", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "appendix", "function": "state_next_steps", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-12f27173c6f0/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-12f27173c6f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-12f27173c6f0#slide-31", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 29, "beatId": "72c4ab37-07ea-4575-aa0c-6d343e65a83f", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Team", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-team", "evidence": "About Ipsos and About Simon Anholt", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }