{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 384, "pageSize": 18, "pageCount": 17777, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 49, "slideType": "org_design", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a two-column structure to contrast support provided vs. support needed.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/49", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-49", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 51, "from": 48, "name": "Stakeholder Map", "slug": "45-stakeholder-map", "bestFor": "Change management, political navigation, implementation planning", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9766ac37d89e", "evidence": "Steering Committee -> BCO Core Team -> Business leads -> Initiative leads -> Change agents.", "position": 6, "objective": "Define BCO governance and roles", "structure": "The Decision -> Key Stakeholders -> Their Interests/Concerns -> The Alignment Strategy", "confidence": 70, "description": "Identify key players, their interests, and how to navigate them" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-29344368199c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "BCO Core Team org design, field force work approach, closing 'Questions?'.", "position": 5, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 50, "slideType": "org_design", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a hierarchical structure to define governance and execution responsibilities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/50", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-50", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 51, "from": 48, "name": "Stakeholder Map", "slug": "45-stakeholder-map", "bestFor": "Change management, political navigation, implementation planning", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9766ac37d89e", "evidence": "Steering Committee -> BCO Core Team -> Business leads -> Initiative leads -> Change agents.", "position": 6, "objective": "Define BCO governance and roles", "structure": "The Decision -> Key Stakeholders -> Their Interests/Concerns -> The Alignment Strategy", "confidence": 70, "description": "Identify key players, their interests, and how to navigate them" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-29344368199c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "BCO Core Team org design, field force work approach, closing 'Questions?'.", "position": 5, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 51, "slideType": "org_design", "function": "plan_implementation", "notes": "The slide contains a placeholder for 'Initiative Lead' and a callout note regarding iteration with Glenn.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/51", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-51", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 51, "from": 48, "name": "Stakeholder Map", "slug": "45-stakeholder-map", "bestFor": "Change management, political navigation, implementation planning", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9766ac37d89e", "evidence": "Steering Committee -> BCO Core Team -> Business leads -> Initiative leads -> Change agents.", "position": 6, "objective": "Define BCO governance and roles", "structure": "The Decision -> Key Stakeholders -> Their Interests/Concerns -> The Alignment Strategy", "confidence": 70, "description": "Identify key players, their interests, and how to navigate them" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-29344368199c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "BCO Core Team org design, field force work approach, closing 'Questions?'.", "position": 5, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 52, "slideType": "agenda", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/52", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-52", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-29344368199c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "BCO Core Team org design, field force work approach, closing 'Questions?'.", "position": 5, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 53, "slideType": "roadmap", "function": "plan_implementation", "notes": "The slide uses a horizontal process flow diagram to outline the timeline and key activities for each phase.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/53", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-53", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-29344368199c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "BCO Core Team org design, field force work approach, closing 'Questions?'.", "position": 5, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 54, "slideType": "closing_ask", "function": "state_next_steps", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/54", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-54", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-29344368199c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "BCO Core Team org design, field force work approach, closing 'Questions?'.", "position": 5, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 55, "slideType": "appendix", "function": "appendix", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/55", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-55", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 56, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a process-oriented layout to define operational excellence criteria for each stage of a project lifecycle.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/56", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-56", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 61, "from": 56, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302", "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.", "position": 7, "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 57, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a process flow diagram at the top right to anchor the 'Define' phase.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/57", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-57", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 61, "from": 56, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302", "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.", "position": 7, "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 58, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Includes a process flow diagram at the top right indicating the 'Design' phase.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/58", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-58", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 61, "from": 56, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302", "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.", "position": 7, "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 59, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Includes a process flow diagram at the top right indicating the 'Schedule' phase.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/59", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-59", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 61, "from": 56, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302", "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.", "position": 7, "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 60, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a process flow diagram at the top to contextualize the 'Execute' phase.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/60", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-60", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 61, "from": 56, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302", "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.", "position": 7, "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 61, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Includes a process flow diagram at the top right and several diagnostic charts (bar, treemap, waterfall) on the right side.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/61", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-61", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 61, "from": 56, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302", "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.", "position": 7, "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 62, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a four-step process header (Develop Hypothesis, Test with Data, Design through Pilot, Implement and Scale) to frame the exercise.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/62", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-62", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 64, "from": 62, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9ebeb0f062cd", "evidence": "Per-diem labor problem -> spend analysis ($355M) -> 25-30% O&M savings outcome.", "position": 8, "objective": "Gas Ops external-labor precedent case", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 63, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a process flow at the top and a stacked bar chart to compare O&M and Capital spend composition.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/63", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-63", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 64, "from": 62, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9ebeb0f062cd", "evidence": "Per-diem labor problem -> spend analysis ($355M) -> 25-30% O&M savings outcome.", "position": 8, "objective": "Gas Ops external-labor precedent case", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 64, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a four-step process framework to describe a case study at PG&E.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/64", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-64", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 64, "from": 62, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9ebeb0f062cd", "evidence": "Per-diem labor problem -> spend analysis ($355M) -> 25-30% O&M savings outcome.", "position": 8, "objective": "Gas Ops external-labor precedent case", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 65, "slideType": "client_example", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a process flow structure with a placeholder for content and a callout box asking for data validation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/65", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-65", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 65, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-a34dd296b278", "evidence": "Case setup -> root-cause questions -> quarterly alignment improvement -> pilot process.", "position": 9, "objective": "Utility Co planning-execution precedent", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 75, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 66, "slideType": "client_example", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-like bridge to show the transition from 'All Jobs' to a detailed breakdown of 'Jobs with false starts'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/66", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-66", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 65, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-a34dd296b278", "evidence": "Case setup -> root-cause questions -> quarterly alignment improvement -> pilot process.", "position": 9, "objective": "Utility Co planning-execution precedent", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 75, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }