{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 32, "pageSize": 60, "pageCount": 5333, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/sPJE-dcBUhO6ZXtaMlumLrdx0uC5bLlY68D5htGC5r8/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy83NTE1NGI4MjMyOTBhMTA5L3AwMDEuanBn", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-1", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de0ed-a564-75af-ba6e-6827be3d42cf", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Surface Observation", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Cover, TOC and 5-bullet key highlights sit at the surface.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/XfHdaEn0l7DDJxhMBfT-Fs3ElK8aakYcIO9iD62jmlQ/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy83NTE1NGI4MjMyOTBhMTA5L3AwMDEucG5n", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/g0hT2sQofGtu6ZBxkwgEAlk_aNOgEOF5vxhZGX0zdI0/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy83NTE1NGI4MjMyOTBhMTA5L3AwMDEuanBn", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/DPb_MU9fka0QRljz_tkMdhnXBTLTTcQCsTSbR5zboLk/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy83NTE1NGI4MjMyOTBhMTA5L3AwMDEucG5n" }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "table_of_contents", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-2", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de0ed-a564-75af-ba6e-6827be3d42cf", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Surface Observation", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Cover, TOC and 5-bullet key highlights sit at the surface.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019de0ed-a6e6-70fa-ba0e-2efeb2ea56c7", "evidence": "p.3-5 each present same 5-theme structure (Efficiency, Quality, Investments, Technology, Talent).", "position": 1, "objective": "Frame survey findings into 5 MECE themes", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de0ed-a564-75af-ba6e-6827be3d42cf", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Surface Observation", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Cover, TOC and 5-bullet key highlights sit at the surface.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019de0ed-a6e6-70fa-ba0e-2efeb2ea56c7", "evidence": "p.3-5 each present same 5-theme structure (Efficiency, Quality, Investments, Technology, Talent).", "position": 1, "objective": "Frame survey findings into 5 MECE themes", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de0ed-a564-75af-ba6e-6827be3d42cf", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Surface Observation", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Cover, TOC and 5-bullet key highlights sit at the surface.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019de0ed-a6e6-70fa-ba0e-2efeb2ea56c7", "evidence": "p.3-5 each present same 5-theme structure (Efficiency, Quality, Investments, Technology, Talent).", "position": 1, "objective": "Frame survey findings into 5 MECE themes", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de0ed-a564-75af-ba6e-6827be3d42cf", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Surface Observation", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Cover, TOC and 5-bullet key highlights sit at the surface.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-6", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a consistent color palette to represent different segments across multiple charts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 7, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de0ed-a70f-7226-8ff8-91743b09b900", "evidence": "Five slides decomposing 434 respondents by LOB, account size, age, tenure.", "position": 2, "objective": "Profile sample by line of business and account size", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 78, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses two 100% stacked bar charts to compare age and tenure distributions across four insurance business lines.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 7, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de0ed-a70f-7226-8ff8-91743b09b900", "evidence": "Five slides decomposing 434 respondents by LOB, account size, age, tenure.", "position": 2, "objective": "Profile sample by line of business and account size", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 78, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "segmentation", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses two 100% stacked bar charts to visualize the distribution of respondents across different premium tiers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 7, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de0ed-a70f-7226-8ff8-91743b09b900", "evidence": "Five slides decomposing 434 respondents by LOB, account size, age, tenure.", "position": 2, "objective": "Profile sample by line of business and account size", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 78, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a consistent purple color palette to represent different segments across four stacked bar charts and one donut chart.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 7, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de0ed-a70f-7226-8ff8-91743b09b900", "evidence": "Five slides decomposing 434 respondents by LOB, account size, age, tenure.", "position": 2, "objective": "Profile sample by line of business and account size", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 78, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Includes job title, average account premium, company net premiums, age, and years of experience.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 7, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de0ed-a70f-7226-8ff8-91743b09b900", "evidence": "Five slides decomposing 434 respondents by LOB, account size, age, tenure.", "position": 2, "objective": "Profile sample by line of business and account size", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 78, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-12", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de0ed-a738-76ab-a189-5b29a470e388", "evidence": "p.14 visible time-waste -> p.16-18 ineffective systems cited 71% -> p.19-22 investment drivers.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show 40% non-core time symptom is driven by hidden systems/process root cause", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 65, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a donut chart for high-level categorization and a horizontal bar chart for granular activity breakdown.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de0ed-a738-76ab-a189-5b29a470e388", "evidence": "p.14 visible time-waste -> p.16-18 ineffective systems cited 71% -> p.19-22 investment drivers.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show 40% non-core time symptom is driven by hidden systems/process root cause", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 65, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses stacked bar charts to visualize survey data regarding underwriter time allocation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de0ed-a738-76ab-a189-5b29a470e388", "evidence": "p.14 visible time-waste -> p.16-18 ineffective systems cited 71% -> p.19-22 investment drivers.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show 40% non-core time symptom is driven by hidden systems/process root cause", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 65, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide presents survey data from 434 respondents regarding underwriting function challenges.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de0ed-a738-76ab-a189-5b29a470e388", "evidence": "p.14 visible time-waste -> p.16-18 ineffective systems cited 71% -> p.19-22 investment drivers.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show 40% non-core time symptom is driven by hidden systems/process root cause", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 65, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The chart highlights specific pain points in underwriting processes, with a focus on systems and training.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de0ed-a738-76ab-a189-5b29a470e388", "evidence": "p.14 visible time-waste -> p.16-18 ineffective systems cited 71% -> p.19-22 investment drivers.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show 40% non-core time symptom is driven by hidden systems/process root cause", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 65, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Yellow dashed boxes highlight specific segments where smaller accounts report higher challenges.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de0ed-a738-76ab-a189-5b29a470e388", "evidence": "p.14 visible time-waste -> p.16-18 ineffective systems cited 71% -> p.19-22 investment drivers.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show 40% non-core time symptom is driven by hidden systems/process root cause", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 65, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays survey results for six factors, with segments for 'Very important', 'Important', 'Not very important', and 'Not important at all'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de0ed-a738-76ab-a189-5b29a470e388", "evidence": "p.14 visible time-waste -> p.16-18 ineffective systems cited 71% -> p.19-22 investment drivers.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show 40% non-core time symptom is driven by hidden systems/process root cause", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 65, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart highlights differences in investment priorities between lines of business, specifically noting that personal lines prioritize ease-of-doing business and expense reduction, while specialty lines focus on new product/channel launches.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de0ed-a738-76ab-a189-5b29a470e388", "evidence": "p.14 visible time-waste -> p.16-18 ineffective systems cited 71% -> p.19-22 investment drivers.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show 40% non-core time symptom is driven by hidden systems/process root cause", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 65, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays survey data from 434 respondents regarding factors impacting underwriting.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de0ed-a738-76ab-a189-5b29a470e388", "evidence": "p.14 visible time-waste -> p.16-18 ineffective systems cited 71% -> p.19-22 investment drivers.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show 40% non-core time symptom is driven by hidden systems/process root cause", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 65, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays survey results from 434 respondents across five lines of business.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de0ed-a738-76ab-a189-5b29a470e388", "evidence": "p.14 visible time-waste -> p.16-18 ineffective systems cited 71% -> p.19-22 investment drivers.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show 40% non-core time symptom is driven by hidden systems/process root cause", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 65, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-23", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5b8-732e-b7b7-b08c381f0615", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Quality and Efficiency sections show declines vs 2008/2013.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 24, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a761-728a-8f20-bfb42802132a", "evidence": "p.27 explicit 2008/2013/2021 comparison; p.28 priority areas.", "position": 4, "objective": "Show quality has declined and identify priority gaps", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 75, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5b8-732e-b7b7-b08c381f0615", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Quality and Efficiency sections show declines vs 2008/2013.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart is a 100% stacked bar chart representing survey responses on a 5-point scale plus 'Don't know'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 24, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a761-728a-8f20-bfb42802132a", "evidence": "p.27 explicit 2008/2013/2021 comparison; p.28 priority areas.", "position": 4, "objective": "Show quality has declined and identify priority gaps", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 75, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5b8-732e-b7b7-b08c381f0615", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Quality and Efficiency sections show declines vs 2008/2013.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Includes a remarks section highlighting specific comparisons between commercial and personal lines.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 24, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a761-728a-8f20-bfb42802132a", "evidence": "p.27 explicit 2008/2013/2021 comparison; p.28 priority areas.", "position": 4, "objective": "Show quality has declined and identify priority gaps", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 75, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5b8-732e-b7b7-b08c381f0615", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Quality and Efficiency sections show declines vs 2008/2013.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart shows a consistent decline in perceived quality across all categories from 2013 to 2021.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 24, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a761-728a-8f20-bfb42802132a", "evidence": "p.27 explicit 2008/2013/2021 comparison; p.28 priority areas.", "position": 4, "objective": "Show quality has declined and identify priority gaps", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 75, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5b8-732e-b7b7-b08c381f0615", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Quality and Efficiency sections show declines vs 2008/2013.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to show the distribution of responses, with a summary column on the right.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 24, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a761-728a-8f20-bfb42802132a", "evidence": "p.27 explicit 2008/2013/2021 comparison; p.28 priority areas.", "position": 4, "objective": "Show quality has declined and identify priority gaps", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 75, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5b8-732e-b7b7-b08c381f0615", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Quality and Efficiency sections show declines vs 2008/2013.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart highlights differences in perceived importance of risk evaluation tools and third-party data based on account size.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 24, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a761-728a-8f20-bfb42802132a", "evidence": "p.27 explicit 2008/2013/2021 comparison; p.28 priority areas.", "position": 4, "objective": "Show quality has declined and identify priority gaps", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 75, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5b8-732e-b7b7-b08c381f0615", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Quality and Efficiency sections show declines vs 2008/2013.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-30", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5b8-732e-b7b7-b08c381f0615", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Quality and Efficiency sections show declines vs 2008/2013.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-31", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 31, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019de0ed-a789-723a-96f6-128c62bc5981", "evidence": "p.32 current solution ratings; p.35 planned investments; p.37 2013 vs 2021 automation.", "position": 5, "objective": "Diagnose current efficiency maturity and required investment roadmap", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 60, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5b8-732e-b7b7-b08c381f0615", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Quality and Efficiency sections show declines vs 2008/2013.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a diverging stacked bar format to visualize Likert-scale survey responses.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-32", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 31, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019de0ed-a789-723a-96f6-128c62bc5981", "evidence": "p.32 current solution ratings; p.35 planned investments; p.37 2013 vs 2021 automation.", "position": 5, "objective": "Diagnose current efficiency maturity and required investment roadmap", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 60, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5b8-732e-b7b7-b08c381f0615", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Quality and Efficiency sections show declines vs 2008/2013.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to visualize survey responses on a 1-5 scale plus 'Don't know'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-33", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 31, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019de0ed-a789-723a-96f6-128c62bc5981", "evidence": "p.32 current solution ratings; p.35 planned investments; p.37 2013 vs 2021 automation.", "position": 5, "objective": "Diagnose current efficiency maturity and required investment roadmap", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 60, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5b8-732e-b7b7-b08c381f0615", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Quality and Efficiency sections show declines vs 2008/2013.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 34, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Includes a yellow highlight box on the chart for specific account size segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/34", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-34", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 31, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019de0ed-a789-723a-96f6-128c62bc5981", "evidence": "p.32 current solution ratings; p.35 planned investments; p.37 2013 vs 2021 automation.", "position": 5, "objective": "Diagnose current efficiency maturity and required investment roadmap", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 60, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5b8-732e-b7b7-b08c381f0615", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Quality and Efficiency sections show declines vs 2008/2013.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 35, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays survey results regarding investment priorities in underwriting, with a breakdown of 'Currently investing', 'Planned in next 3 years', 'Not a priority', and 'Don't know'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/35", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-35", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 31, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019de0ed-a789-723a-96f6-128c62bc5981", "evidence": "p.32 current solution ratings; p.35 planned investments; p.37 2013 vs 2021 automation.", "position": 5, "objective": "Diagnose current efficiency maturity and required investment roadmap", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 60, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5b8-732e-b7b7-b08c381f0615", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Quality and Efficiency sections show declines vs 2008/2013.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 36, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays survey results regarding automation levels, with a clear trend showing lower automation for larger accounts and specialty lines.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/36", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-36", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 31, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019de0ed-a789-723a-96f6-128c62bc5981", "evidence": "p.32 current solution ratings; p.35 planned investments; p.37 2013 vs 2021 automation.", "position": 5, "objective": "Diagnose current efficiency maturity and required investment roadmap", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 60, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5b8-732e-b7b7-b08c381f0615", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Quality and Efficiency sections show declines vs 2008/2013.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 37, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart shows a clear trend of increasing automation across all segments from 2013 to 2021.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/37", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-37", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 31, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019de0ed-a789-723a-96f6-128c62bc5981", "evidence": "p.32 current solution ratings; p.35 planned investments; p.37 2013 vs 2021 automation.", "position": 5, "objective": "Diagnose current efficiency maturity and required investment roadmap", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 60, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5b8-732e-b7b7-b08c381f0615", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Quality and Efficiency sections show declines vs 2008/2013.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 38, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/38", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-38", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 39, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/39", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-39", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 39, "name": "Paradox Resolver", "slug": "20-paradox-resolver", "bestFor": "Strategic pivots, innovation pitches, challenging conventional wisdom", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7b0-73fb-8724-b675333a497a", "evidence": "p.40 60% positive impact vs p.41 callout '64% say workload increased or had no change'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Resolve apparent contradiction: tech improves performance yet does not reduce workload", "structure": "The Apparent Contradiction -> Why Both Seem True -> The Deeper Truth That Reconciles", "confidence": 80, "description": "Introduce a seeming contradiction that captures attention, then resolve it with a deeper truth" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 40, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a diverging stacked bar format to represent a 5-point Likert scale.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/40", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-40", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 39, "name": "Paradox Resolver", "slug": "20-paradox-resolver", "bestFor": "Strategic pivots, innovation pitches, challenging conventional wisdom", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7b0-73fb-8724-b675333a497a", "evidence": "p.40 60% positive impact vs p.41 callout '64% say workload increased or had no change'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Resolve apparent contradiction: tech improves performance yet does not reduce workload", "structure": "The Apparent Contradiction -> Why Both Seem True -> The Deeper Truth That Reconciles", "confidence": 80, "description": "Introduce a seeming contradiction that captures attention, then resolve it with a deeper truth" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 41, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide presents two distinct survey questions (Q11 and Q12) regarding the impact of technology on underwriting workflows.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/41", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-41", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 39, "name": "Paradox Resolver", "slug": "20-paradox-resolver", "bestFor": "Strategic pivots, innovation pitches, challenging conventional wisdom", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7b0-73fb-8724-b675333a497a", "evidence": "p.40 60% positive impact vs p.41 callout '64% say workload increased or had no change'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Resolve apparent contradiction: tech improves performance yet does not reduce workload", "structure": "The Apparent Contradiction -> Why Both Seem True -> The Deeper Truth That Reconciles", "confidence": 80, "description": "Introduce a seeming contradiction that captures attention, then resolve it with a deeper truth" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 42, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses stacked bar charts to compare the impact of technology on workload across different segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/42", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-42", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 39, "name": "Paradox Resolver", "slug": "20-paradox-resolver", "bestFor": "Strategic pivots, innovation pitches, challenging conventional wisdom", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7b0-73fb-8724-b675333a497a", "evidence": "p.40 60% positive impact vs p.41 callout '64% say workload increased or had no change'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Resolve apparent contradiction: tech improves performance yet does not reduce workload", "structure": "The Apparent Contradiction -> Why Both Seem True -> The Deeper Truth That Reconciles", "confidence": 80, "description": "Introduce a seeming contradiction that captures attention, then resolve it with a deeper truth" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 43, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart highlights a significant decrease in the perception of increased workload since 2013.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/43", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-43", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 39, "name": "Paradox Resolver", "slug": "20-paradox-resolver", "bestFor": "Strategic pivots, innovation pitches, challenging conventional wisdom", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7b0-73fb-8724-b675333a497a", "evidence": "p.40 60% positive impact vs p.41 callout '64% say workload increased or had no change'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Resolve apparent contradiction: tech improves performance yet does not reduce workload", "structure": "The Apparent Contradiction -> Why Both Seem True -> The Deeper Truth That Reconciles", "confidence": 80, "description": "Introduce a seeming contradiction that captures attention, then resolve it with a deeper truth" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 44, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays survey results regarding technology-related workload challenges.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/44", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-44", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 39, "name": "Paradox Resolver", "slug": "20-paradox-resolver", "bestFor": "Strategic pivots, innovation pitches, challenging conventional wisdom", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7b0-73fb-8724-b675333a497a", "evidence": "p.40 60% positive impact vs p.41 callout '64% say workload increased or had no change'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Resolve apparent contradiction: tech improves performance yet does not reduce workload", "structure": "The Apparent Contradiction -> Why Both Seem True -> The Deeper Truth That Reconciles", "confidence": 80, "description": "Introduce a seeming contradiction that captures attention, then resolve it with a deeper truth" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 45, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays 18 categories of technology, each with 5 status levels (Already implemented, Being implemented/planned, Planned, No activity, N/A).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/45", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-45", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 39, "name": "Paradox Resolver", "slug": "20-paradox-resolver", "bestFor": "Strategic pivots, innovation pitches, challenging conventional wisdom", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7b0-73fb-8724-b675333a497a", "evidence": "p.40 60% positive impact vs p.41 callout '64% say workload increased or had no change'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Resolve apparent contradiction: tech improves performance yet does not reduce workload", "structure": "The Apparent Contradiction -> Why Both Seem True -> The Deeper Truth That Reconciles", "confidence": 80, "description": "Introduce a seeming contradiction that captures attention, then resolve it with a deeper truth" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 46, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart shows a breakdown of AI adoption stages (implemented, in progress, planned, no activity, N/A) for 8 specific underwriting activities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/46", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-46", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 39, "name": "Paradox Resolver", "slug": "20-paradox-resolver", "bestFor": "Strategic pivots, innovation pitches, challenging conventional wisdom", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7b0-73fb-8724-b675333a497a", "evidence": "p.40 60% positive impact vs p.41 callout '64% say workload increased or had no change'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Resolve apparent contradiction: tech improves performance yet does not reduce workload", "structure": "The Apparent Contradiction -> Why Both Seem True -> The Deeper Truth That Reconciles", "confidence": 80, "description": "Introduce a seeming contradiction that captures attention, then resolve it with a deeper truth" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 47, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/47", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-47", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 48, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/48", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-48", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7d9-7480-a20f-0a8f27d9c1e5", "evidence": "p.54 callout 'all aspects related to talent management have worsened compared to 2013'.", "position": 7, "objective": "Show talent management has worsened across all dimensions vs 2013", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 49, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a diverging stacked bar format to represent Likert-scale survey responses.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/49", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-49", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7d9-7480-a20f-0a8f27d9c1e5", "evidence": "p.54 callout 'all aspects related to talent management have worsened compared to 2013'.", "position": 7, "objective": "Show talent management has worsened across all dimensions vs 2013", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 50, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to visualize survey responses on a 5-point scale. Two specific bars are highlighted with yellow dashed boxes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/50", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-50", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7d9-7480-a20f-0a8f27d9c1e5", "evidence": "p.54 callout 'all aspects related to talent management have worsened compared to 2013'.", "position": 7, "objective": "Show talent management has worsened across all dimensions vs 2013", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 51, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses stacked bar charts to visualize survey responses on a 5-point scale. Yellow dashed boxes highlight specific segments for comparison.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/51", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-51", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7d9-7480-a20f-0a8f27d9c1e5", "evidence": "p.54 callout 'all aspects related to talent management have worsened compared to 2013'.", "position": 7, "objective": "Show talent management has worsened across all dimensions vs 2013", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 52, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The red dashed box highlights the lower-performing categories identified in the remarks.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/52", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-52", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7d9-7480-a20f-0a8f27d9c1e5", "evidence": "p.54 callout 'all aspects related to talent management have worsened compared to 2013'.", "position": 7, "objective": "Show talent management has worsened across all dimensions vs 2013", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 53, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart highlights specific areas of deficiency in talent management, with yellow dashed boxes emphasizing certain high-deficiency segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/53", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-53", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7d9-7480-a20f-0a8f27d9c1e5", "evidence": "p.54 callout 'all aspects related to talent management have worsened compared to 2013'.", "position": 7, "objective": "Show talent management has worsened across all dimensions vs 2013", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 54, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart shows a consistent downward trend in superior ratings for all talent management aspects between 2013 and 2021.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/54", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-54", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7d9-7480-a20f-0a8f27d9c1e5", "evidence": "p.54 callout 'all aspects related to talent management have worsened compared to 2013'.", "position": 7, "objective": "Show talent management has worsened across all dimensions vs 2013", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 55, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/55", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-55", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 55, "beatId": "019de0ed-a608-7502-87e6-f2a2c5ad3d0d", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Implications", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Open-end qualitative concerns spell out implications.", "position": 5, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 58, "from": 55, "beatId": "019de0ed-a6bc-708f-b2e6-6e0aa31d9e1f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Open-end excitements and concerns hint at next moves but no recommendations.", "position": 3, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 56, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a split-layout to contrast positive and negative sentiment themes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/56", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-56", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 56, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "019de0ed-a801-7798-809e-3019ac628e5d", "evidence": "p.57-58 organize verbatim quotes into 4 thematic quadrants of excitement/concern.", "position": 8, "objective": "Synthesize verbatim underwriter quotes into themes", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 85, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 55, "beatId": "019de0ed-a608-7502-87e6-f2a2c5ad3d0d", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Implications", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Open-end qualitative concerns spell out implications.", "position": 5, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 58, "from": 55, "beatId": "019de0ed-a6bc-708f-b2e6-6e0aa31d9e1f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Open-end excitements and concerns hint at next moves but no recommendations.", "position": 3, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 57, "slideType": "testimonial", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a 2x2 grid layout to categorize qualitative feedback.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/57", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-57", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 56, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "019de0ed-a801-7798-809e-3019ac628e5d", "evidence": "p.57-58 organize verbatim quotes into 4 thematic quadrants of excitement/concern.", "position": 8, "objective": "Synthesize verbatim underwriter quotes into themes", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 85, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 55, "beatId": "019de0ed-a608-7502-87e6-f2a2c5ad3d0d", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Implications", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Open-end qualitative concerns spell out implications.", "position": 5, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 58, "from": 55, "beatId": "019de0ed-a6bc-708f-b2e6-6e0aa31d9e1f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Open-end excitements and concerns hint at next moves but no recommendations.", "position": 3, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 58, "slideType": "quote_slide", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a grid layout to categorize concerns into five thematic areas.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/58", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-58", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 56, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "019de0ed-a801-7798-809e-3019ac628e5d", "evidence": "p.57-58 organize verbatim quotes into 4 thematic quadrants of excitement/concern.", "position": 8, "objective": "Synthesize verbatim underwriter quotes into themes", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 85, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 55, "beatId": "019de0ed-a608-7502-87e6-f2a2c5ad3d0d", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Implications", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Open-end qualitative concerns spell out implications.", "position": 5, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 58, "from": 55, "beatId": "019de0ed-a6bc-708f-b2e6-6e0aa31d9e1f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Open-end excitements and concerns hint at next moves but no recommendations.", "position": 3, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "docSlug": "995a3793461c4fe2", "documentTitle": "Moneyball Moment Marketing Canada", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "closing_ask", "function": "state_next_steps", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e#slide-26", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 26, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-be6901f039c4", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Four numbered Calls to Action close the deck.", "position": 5, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 27, "from": 26, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-c86a5348ac04", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Four-point Call to Action slide.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "docSlug": "995a3793461c4fe2", "documentTitle": "Moneyball Moment Marketing Canada", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "next_steps", "function": "state_next_steps", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e#slide-27", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 26, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-be6901f039c4", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Four numbered Calls to Action close the deck.", "position": 5, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 27, "from": 26, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-c86a5348ac04", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Four-point Call to Action slide.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }