{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 308, "pageSize": 18, "pageCount": 17777, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-c9125ee8e2ec", "evidence": "p3 poses 'Where is the value?'; p4-5 show rising investment data; p6 lands the 75/25 insight.", "position": 1, "objective": "Reveal the AI value gap", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 80, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-25aa4b5eafd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, survey methodology (n=1,803), rising AI ambitions and investments.", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-c9125ee8e2ec", "evidence": "p3 poses 'Where is the value?'; p4-5 show rising investment data; p6 lands the 75/25 insight.", "position": 1, "objective": "Reveal the AI value gap", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 80, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-25aa4b5eafd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, survey methodology (n=1,803), rising AI ambitions and investments.", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The 'One in three' claim is derived by summing the three rightmost segments (18%+7%+6% = 31%) for the Global row.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-c9125ee8e2ec", "evidence": "p3 poses 'Where is the value?'; p4-5 show rising investment data; p6 lands the 75/25 insight.", "position": 1, "objective": "Reveal the AI value gap", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 80, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-25aa4b5eafd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, survey methodology (n=1,803), rising AI ambitions and investments.", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Uses a contrast-pair framing to highlight the 'AI value gap'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-c9125ee8e2ec", "evidence": "p3 poses 'Where is the value?'; p4-5 show rising investment data; p6 lands the 75/25 insight.", "position": 1, "objective": "Reveal the AI value gap", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 80, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-2b19ffa26a23", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "75% prioritize AI but only 25% see significant value — the impact gap.", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 6, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-39d3a64f8202", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "What Is", "beatSlug": "sparkline-what-is-1", "evidence": "Only 25% see value despite priority.", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "transition", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 7, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-cf50f2b3e0d6", "evidence": "Leaders' three plays + 80% focus + 2.1x ROI + 10-20-70 contrasted with most companies' broad/diluted approach.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast leading vs laggard AI approaches", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 82, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-2fbf21425d97", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Three value plays, focus, KPIs, and the 10-20-70 principle as leaders' playbook.", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "Uses the BCG Deploy-Reshape-Invent framework.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 7, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-cf50f2b3e0d6", "evidence": "Leaders' three plays + 80% focus + 2.1x ROI + 10-20-70 contrasted with most companies' broad/diluted approach.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast leading vs laggard AI approaches", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 82, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-2fbf21425d97", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Three value plays, focus, KPIs, and the 10-20-70 principle as leaders' playbook.", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 9, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-3c40eb12b39e", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "What Could Be", "beatSlug": "sparkline-what-could-be-2", "evidence": "Three value plays; leaders put 80% in higher-impact plays.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The chart uses a specific BCG framework for AI investment categorization.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 7, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-cf50f2b3e0d6", "evidence": "Leaders' three plays + 80% focus + 2.1x ROI + 10-20-70 contrasted with most companies' broad/diluted approach.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast leading vs laggard AI approaches", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 82, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-2fbf21425d97", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Three value plays, focus, KPIs, and the 10-20-70 principle as leaders' playbook.", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 9, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-3c40eb12b39e", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "What Could Be", "beatSlug": "sparkline-what-could-be-2", "evidence": "Three value plays; leaders put 80% in higher-impact plays.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses the BCG Deploy-Reshape-Invent framework to categorize AI investment focus.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 7, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-cf50f2b3e0d6", "evidence": "Leaders' three plays + 80% focus + 2.1x ROI + 10-20-70 contrasted with most companies' broad/diluted approach.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast leading vs laggard AI approaches", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 82, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-2fbf21425d97", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Three value plays, focus, KPIs, and the 10-20-70 principle as leaders' playbook.", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 12, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-432b0fe99b01", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "What Is", "beatSlug": "sparkline-what-is-3", "evidence": "Most companies dilute; 60% lack KPIs.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart to show the difference in prioritized use cases (6.1 vs 3.5) and a big number to highlight the 2.1x ROI multiplier.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 7, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-cf50f2b3e0d6", "evidence": "Leaders' three plays + 80% focus + 2.1x ROI + 10-20-70 contrasted with most companies' broad/diluted approach.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast leading vs laggard AI approaches", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 82, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-2fbf21425d97", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Three value plays, focus, KPIs, and the 10-20-70 principle as leaders' playbook.", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 12, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-432b0fe99b01", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "What Is", "beatSlug": "sparkline-what-is-3", "evidence": "Most companies dilute; 60% lack KPIs.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The 60% figure is derived from the sum of 'Not tracking yet' (32%) and 'Operational only' (28%).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 7, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-cf50f2b3e0d6", "evidence": "Leaders' three plays + 80% focus + 2.1x ROI + 10-20-70 contrasted with most companies' broad/diluted approach.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast leading vs laggard AI approaches", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 82, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-2fbf21425d97", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Three value plays, focus, KPIs, and the 10-20-70 principle as leaders' playbook.", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 12, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-432b0fe99b01", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "What Is", "beatSlug": "sparkline-what-is-3", "evidence": "Most companies dilute; 60% lack KPIs.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "Uses an iceberg metaphor to represent the 10-20-70 principle.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 7, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-cf50f2b3e0d6", "evidence": "Leaders' three plays + 80% focus + 2.1x ROI + 10-20-70 contrasted with most companies' broad/diluted approach.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast leading vs laggard AI approaches", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 82, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-2fbf21425d97", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Three value plays, focus, KPIs, and the 10-20-70 principle as leaders' playbook.", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 13, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-471107e69a9c", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "What Could Be", "beatSlug": "sparkline-what-could-be-4", "evidence": "10-20-70 principle as leaders' formula.", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 14, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-d265cade42df", "evidence": "Top-3 risks bar chart then cybersecurity-needs-improvement insight.", "position": 3, "objective": "Frame AI risks companies must navigate", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 60, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-33649f64918f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Risk data, agent adoption stats, geographic benchmarks, talent/upskilling proof.", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 14, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-d265cade42df", "evidence": "Top-3 risks bar chart then cybersecurity-needs-improvement insight.", "position": 3, "objective": "Frame AI risks companies must navigate", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 60, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-33649f64918f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Risk data, agent adoption stats, geographic benchmarks, talent/upskilling proof.", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 16, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-d4df648fd095", "evidence": "Divider 'Year of AI agents?' then definition, 67% considering, geo data, 5 leadership priorities.", "position": 4, "objective": "Zoom into AI agents as the next frontier", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 72, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-33649f64918f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Risk data, agent adoption stats, geographic benchmarks, talent/upskilling proof.", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "other", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a two-part categorization to define AI agents.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 16, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-d4df648fd095", "evidence": "Divider 'Year of AI agents?' then definition, 67% considering, geo data, 5 leadership priorities.", "position": 4, "objective": "Zoom into AI agents as the next frontier", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 72, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-33649f64918f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Risk data, agent adoption stats, geographic benchmarks, talent/upskilling proof.", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 16, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-d4df648fd095", "evidence": "Divider 'Year of AI agents?' then definition, 67% considering, geo data, 5 leadership priorities.", "position": 4, "objective": "Zoom into AI agents as the next frontier", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 72, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-33649f64918f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Risk data, agent adoption stats, geographic benchmarks, talent/upskilling proof.", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays two categories of AI agent adoption per country, with a total percentage for each.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 16, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-d4df648fd095", "evidence": "Divider 'Year of AI agents?' then definition, 67% considering, geo data, 5 leadership priorities.", "position": 4, "objective": "Zoom into AI agents as the next frontier", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 72, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-33649f64918f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Risk data, agent adoption stats, geographic benchmarks, talent/upskilling proof.", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "docSlug": "6343adff3aaa1ea3", "documentTitle": "AI Radar 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-564114f9d8e5#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 16, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-d4df648fd095", "evidence": "Divider 'Year of AI agents?' then definition, 67% considering, geo data, 5 leadership priorities.", "position": 4, "objective": "Zoom into AI agents as the next frontier", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 72, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-33649f64918f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Risk data, agent adoption stats, geographic benchmarks, talent/upskilling proof.", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }