{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 299, "pageSize": 60, "pageCount": 5333, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a four-column layout with icons to present distinct strategic insights.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 3, "name": "Why Now", "slug": "15-why-now", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, fundraising, requesting immediate budget approval", "matchId": "019de984-0595-757b-96ad-a54c582e6765", "evidence": "Intro + current landscape frame AI/IoT trends and convergence as the window of opportunity.", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish why fintech convergence is the urgent context", "structure": "The Context (Trends) -> The Trigger Event -> The Window of Opportunity", "confidence": 70, "description": "Create temporal urgency by proving that the window of opportunity is opening or closing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de984-044c-72cf-a1f7-ce506c756386", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Introduction, key findings, current fintech landscape framing convergence.", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "situation_overview", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "Page 5 of PwC Global Fintech Report 2019.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 3, "name": "Why Now", "slug": "15-why-now", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, fundraising, requesting immediate budget approval", "matchId": "019de984-0595-757b-96ad-a54c582e6765", "evidence": "Intro + current landscape frame AI/IoT trends and convergence as the window of opportunity.", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish why fintech convergence is the urgent context", "structure": "The Context (Trends) -> The Trigger Event -> The Window of Opportunity", "confidence": 70, "description": "Create temporal urgency by proving that the window of opportunity is opening or closing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de984-044c-72cf-a1f7-ce506c756386", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Introduction, key findings, current fintech landscape framing convergence.", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a diverging bar chart format to compare two respondent groups (TMT and FS) across 8 technology categories.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de984-05bb-75aa-b088-7ee8d27cf3b1", "evidence": "Mirrored bar chart Exhibit 1 (TMT vs FS tech priorities) and Exhibit 2 fintech embed rates.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast TMT and FS perceptions of fintech", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de984-0471-731f-83d9-d8abc9dfb905", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Exhibits 1-5: tech priorities, fintech embed rates, product maturity charts.", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de984-0529-7358-a99b-05838344fc0f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Survey exhibits and ranked challenges across TMT vs FS.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Includes a quote from Julien Courbe and regional/size-based insights.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de984-05bb-75aa-b088-7ee8d27cf3b1", "evidence": "Mirrored bar chart Exhibit 1 (TMT vs FS tech priorities) and Exhibit 2 fintech embed rates.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast TMT and FS perceptions of fintech", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de984-0471-731f-83d9-d8abc9dfb905", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Exhibits 1-5: tech priorities, fintech embed rates, product maturity charts.", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de984-0529-7358-a99b-05838344fc0f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Survey exhibits and ranked challenges across TMT vs FS.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "Includes a pull-quote from Wilson Chow regarding the Chinese market.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de984-05bb-75aa-b088-7ee8d27cf3b1", "evidence": "Mirrored bar chart Exhibit 1 (TMT vs FS tech priorities) and Exhibit 2 fintech embed rates.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast TMT and FS perceptions of fintech", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de984-0471-731f-83d9-d8abc9dfb905", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Exhibits 1-5: tech priorities, fintech embed rates, product maturity charts.", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de984-0529-7358-a99b-05838344fc0f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Survey exhibits and ranked challenges across TMT vs FS.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "filler", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a large stock photo of two professionals collaborating to illustrate the theme of partnership.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de984-05bb-75aa-b088-7ee8d27cf3b1", "evidence": "Mirrored bar chart Exhibit 1 (TMT vs FS tech priorities) and Exhibit 2 fintech embed rates.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast TMT and FS perceptions of fintech", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de984-0471-731f-83d9-d8abc9dfb905", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Exhibits 1-5: tech priorities, fintech embed rates, product maturity charts.", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de984-0529-7358-a99b-05838344fc0f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Survey exhibits and ranked challenges across TMT vs FS.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show confidence levels in fintech-driven revenue growth, supplemented by qualitative insights on regional and organizational size differences.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de984-05e0-7741-b1dc-7481851fa679", "evidence": "Exhibit 5 action title: 'FS organisations are slightly behind TMT firms in moving products to market'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show FS lagging TMT on product maturity and confidence", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 75, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de984-0471-731f-83d9-d8abc9dfb905", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Exhibits 1-5: tech priorities, fintech embed rates, product maturity charts.", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de984-0529-7358-a99b-05838344fc0f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Survey exhibits and ranked challenges across TMT vs FS.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart is a diverging bar chart comparing two sectors across 11 categories.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de984-05e0-7741-b1dc-7481851fa679", "evidence": "Exhibit 5 action title: 'FS organisations are slightly behind TMT firms in moving products to market'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show FS lagging TMT on product maturity and confidence", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 75, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de984-0471-731f-83d9-d8abc9dfb905", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Exhibits 1-5: tech priorities, fintech embed rates, product maturity charts.", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de984-0529-7358-a99b-05838344fc0f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Survey exhibits and ranked challenges across TMT vs FS.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to represent maturity stages from research to profitability.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de984-05e0-7741-b1dc-7481851fa679", "evidence": "Exhibit 5 action title: 'FS organisations are slightly behind TMT firms in moving products to market'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show FS lagging TMT on product maturity and confidence", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 75, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de984-0471-731f-83d9-d8abc9dfb905", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Exhibits 1-5: tech priorities, fintech embed rates, product maturity charts.", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de984-0529-7358-a99b-05838344fc0f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Survey exhibits and ranked challenges across TMT vs FS.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Includes a pull-quote from John Garvey and additional insights on regional/company size differences.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de984-0605-7358-8c5d-1be86824eb03", "evidence": "Symptom = slow speed-to-market; root = only 33%/41% have C-suite leading fintech (Exhibit 6).", "position": 4, "objective": "Diagnose the leadership root cause behind slow fintech progress", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 75, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 13, "beatId": "019de984-0496-75c8-b265-8a2d50281949", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "C-suite leadership gap (Exhibit 6) and challenges-to-growth (Exhibit 7).", "position": 3, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de984-0529-7358-a99b-05838344fc0f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Survey exhibits and ranked challenges across TMT vs FS.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a horizontal bar chart format to represent ranked survey data for two distinct industry segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de984-0605-7358-8c5d-1be86824eb03", "evidence": "Symptom = slow speed-to-market; root = only 33%/41% have C-suite leading fintech (Exhibit 6).", "position": 4, "objective": "Diagnose the leadership root cause behind slow fintech progress", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 75, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 13, "beatId": "019de984-0496-75c8-b265-8a2d50281949", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "C-suite leadership gap (Exhibit 6) and challenges-to-growth (Exhibit 7).", "position": 3, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de984-0529-7358-a99b-05838344fc0f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Survey exhibits and ranked challenges across TMT vs FS.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "The slide is part of a PwC Global Fintech Report 2019. It introduces a framework of four growth areas (digital, workforce transformation, deals, and risk/regulation), though only 'Digital' is detailed on this page.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 15, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019de984-062a-73bd-a0f8-b0e4d2b6e2e6", "evidence": "'How to position your firm' narrative -> three numbered 'Steps to take' on personalisation, balance, security.", "position": 5, "objective": "Cascade from digital landscape data to recommended steps", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 70, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 15, "beatId": "019de984-04ba-7542-bc2c-1ae5e99e9f13", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Three 'Steps to take' blocks (digital, workforce, deals) with supporting data.", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 17, "from": 15, "beatId": "019de984-054d-7705-b192-24662f8e2bce", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Positioning narratives framing why action is needed.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Includes a pull-quote from Olwyn Alexander (PwC Ireland) regarding digital preferences.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 15, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019de984-062a-73bd-a0f8-b0e4d2b6e2e6", "evidence": "'How to position your firm' narrative -> three numbered 'Steps to take' on personalisation, balance, security.", "position": 5, "objective": "Cascade from digital landscape data to recommended steps", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 70, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 15, "beatId": "019de984-04ba-7542-bc2c-1ae5e99e9f13", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Three 'Steps to take' blocks (digital, workforce, deals) with supporting data.", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 17, "from": 15, "beatId": "019de984-054d-7705-b192-24662f8e2bce", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Positioning narratives framing why action is needed.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide contains a quote from Bhushan Sethi and two main sections: 'Open up the black box' and 'Workforce transformation'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 17, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019de984-064d-7470-8ffd-d16ddb2f844c", "evidence": "'Open up the black box' -> Exhibit 8 skills concerns -> three workforce 'Steps to take'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Cascade from skills-gap data to workforce action steps", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 72, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 15, "beatId": "019de984-04ba-7542-bc2c-1ae5e99e9f13", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Three 'Steps to take' blocks (digital, workforce, deals) with supporting data.", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 17, "from": 15, "beatId": "019de984-054d-7705-b192-24662f8e2bce", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Positioning narratives framing why action is needed.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to compare TMT (top row of each pair) and FS (bottom row of each pair) across three levels of concern.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 17, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019de984-064d-7470-8ffd-d16ddb2f844c", "evidence": "'Open up the black box' -> Exhibit 8 skills concerns -> three workforce 'Steps to take'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Cascade from skills-gap data to workforce action steps", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 72, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 15, "beatId": "019de984-04ba-7542-bc2c-1ae5e99e9f13", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Three 'Steps to take' blocks (digital, workforce, deals) with supporting data.", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 23, "from": 18, "beatId": "019de984-0571-774b-9a2d-e03aa813312b", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "'Steps to take' lists for workforce, deals, regulation; conclusion.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "recommend", "notes": "The slide outlines three key areas: managing technology impact, shifting workforce to digital, and creating an attractive culture.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 17, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019de984-064d-7470-8ffd-d16ddb2f844c", "evidence": "'Open up the black box' -> Exhibit 8 skills concerns -> three workforce 'Steps to take'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Cascade from skills-gap data to workforce action steps", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 72, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 15, "beatId": "019de984-04ba-7542-bc2c-1ae5e99e9f13", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Three 'Steps to take' blocks (digital, workforce, deals) with supporting data.", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 23, "from": 18, "beatId": "019de984-0571-774b-9a2d-e03aa813312b", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "'Steps to take' lists for workforce, deals, regulation; conclusion.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide includes a narrative summary box at the bottom and a detailed breakdown of collaboration preferences by sector.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 20, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de984-0672-734c-b9da-b4d1519b9f43", "evidence": "Exhibit 9 mirrored collaboration charts and Exhibit 10 mirrored regulation worries between TMT and FS.", "position": 7, "objective": "Compare TMT vs FS collaboration and regulation stances", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 15, "beatId": "019de984-04ba-7542-bc2c-1ae5e99e9f13", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Three 'Steps to take' blocks (digital, workforce, deals) with supporting data.", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 23, "from": 18, "beatId": "019de984-0571-774b-9a2d-e03aa813312b", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "'Steps to take' lists for workforce, deals, regulation; conclusion.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "The slide provides actionable advice for firms navigating fintech partnerships, focusing on operating models, cultural alignment, and regulatory compliance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 20, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de984-0672-734c-b9da-b4d1519b9f43", "evidence": "Exhibit 9 mirrored collaboration charts and Exhibit 10 mirrored regulation worries between TMT and FS.", "position": 7, "objective": "Compare TMT vs FS collaboration and regulation stances", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 15, "beatId": "019de984-04ba-7542-bc2c-1ae5e99e9f13", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Three 'Steps to take' blocks (digital, workforce, deals) with supporting data.", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 23, "from": 18, "beatId": "019de984-0571-774b-9a2d-e03aa813312b", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "'Steps to take' lists for workforce, deals, regulation; conclusion.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart is a diverging bar chart comparing two segments (TMT and FS) across the same categories.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 20, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de984-0672-734c-b9da-b4d1519b9f43", "evidence": "Exhibit 9 mirrored collaboration charts and Exhibit 10 mirrored regulation worries between TMT and FS.", "position": 7, "objective": "Compare TMT vs FS collaboration and regulation stances", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 15, "beatId": "019de984-04ba-7542-bc2c-1ae5e99e9f13", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Three 'Steps to take' blocks (digital, workforce, deals) with supporting data.", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 23, "from": 18, "beatId": "019de984-0571-774b-9a2d-e03aa813312b", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "'Steps to take' lists for workforce, deals, regulation; conclusion.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "closing_ask", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-23", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de984-04de-73bf-af54-7ded3c89f7e6", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Conclusion: firms with embedded fintech 'set to seize most of the opportunities'.", "position": 5, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 23, "from": 18, "beatId": "019de984-0571-774b-9a2d-e03aa813312b", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "'Steps to take' lists for workforce, deals, regulation; conclusion.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "appendix", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-24", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "summarize", "notes": "TMT = Technology, Media, and Telecommunications; FS = Financial Services.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-25", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The diagram uses a four-petal flower shape to represent a cyclical process.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-26", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "other", "function": "present_solution", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-27", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "appendix", "function": "other", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-28", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "docSlug": "3312ec45c65a617b", "documentTitle": "Crossing the lines Fintech", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-396ab694b161#slide-29", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/k6CBXgVp-N64XckUNX4n551ZRGX9S6Cp-uetvgjCZas/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy81ZmExMTk5NTE2MjAzOGQ1L3AwMDEuanBn", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-1", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de98a-5477-714c-889d-64d71dc3e983", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Cover, 3 fiscal pillars framework, 4 key focus areas", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/Wf_0f3ElGvtk-799ZOTEVdiR__pEy8cb4obicG2O7lI/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy81ZmExMTk5NTE2MjAzOGQ1L3AwMDEucG5n", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/Rtfjg2EWokfdlt2uZPhEeJFAZGCJ8QF1jYcf2hPgiVQ/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy81ZmExMTk5NTE2MjAzOGQ1L3AwMDEuanBn", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/SSsZFSINeDcAAUtxplm6EW7Zw0berDGLrgGNAxLsxU8/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy81ZmExMTk5NTE2MjAzOGQ1L3AwMDEucG5n" }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-2", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de98a-5477-714c-889d-64d71dc3e983", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Cover, 3 fiscal pillars framework, 4 key focus areas", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-3", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de98a-5477-714c-889d-64d71dc3e983", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Cover, 3 fiscal pillars framework, 4 key focus areas", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a Venn-like diagram for absolute debt and a vertical arrow with bubbles for debt-to-GDP ratios.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-4", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-54a0-722e-a491-86c4fa6a3eb0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt stock + 5 challenges to fiscus with charts", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 15, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-5", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-54a0-722e-a491-86c4fa6a3eb0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt stock + 5 challenges to fiscus with charts", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 15, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to represent the central role of the government in relation to five specific fiscal issues.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "name": "Root Cause Tree", "slug": "37-root-cause-tree", "bestFor": "Problem diagnosis, quality issues, operational failures", "matchId": "019de98a-55e1-76ea-b3ef-38f2e2b7e256", "evidence": "p6 central Government node fans into 5 challenge circles, p7-9 detail each with charts.", "position": 1, "objective": "Decompose fiscal weakness into 5 root causes", "structure": "The Problem -> Branch 1 (Cause A) -> Branch 2 (Cause B) -> Branch 3 (Cause C) -> The Primary Root", "confidence": 80, "description": "Branch out from a problem to its multiple contributing causes" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-54a0-722e-a491-86c4fa6a3eb0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt stock + 5 challenges to fiscus with charts", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 15, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a dual-axis chart approach to show both absolute values (N$) and percentage of GDP for debt and deficit.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "name": "Root Cause Tree", "slug": "37-root-cause-tree", "bestFor": "Problem diagnosis, quality issues, operational failures", "matchId": "019de98a-55e1-76ea-b3ef-38f2e2b7e256", "evidence": "p6 central Government node fans into 5 challenge circles, p7-9 detail each with charts.", "position": 1, "objective": "Decompose fiscal weakness into 5 root causes", "structure": "The Problem -> Branch 1 (Cause A) -> Branch 2 (Cause B) -> Branch 3 (Cause C) -> The Primary Root", "confidence": 80, "description": "Branch out from a problem to its multiple contributing causes" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-54a0-722e-a491-86c4fa6a3eb0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt stock + 5 challenges to fiscus with charts", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 15, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart includes a callout indicating an increase in personnel expenditure over the period, with total expenditure values at the start and end points.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "name": "Root Cause Tree", "slug": "37-root-cause-tree", "bestFor": "Problem diagnosis, quality issues, operational failures", "matchId": "019de98a-55e1-76ea-b3ef-38f2e2b7e256", "evidence": "p6 central Government node fans into 5 challenge circles, p7-9 detail each with charts.", "position": 1, "objective": "Decompose fiscal weakness into 5 root causes", "structure": "The Problem -> Branch 1 (Cause A) -> Branch 2 (Cause B) -> Branch 3 (Cause C) -> The Primary Root", "confidence": 80, "description": "Branch out from a problem to its multiple contributing causes" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-54a0-722e-a491-86c4fa6a3eb0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt stock + 5 challenges to fiscus with charts", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 15, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a dual-axis combo chart to illustrate the dependency on SACU revenue.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "name": "Root Cause Tree", "slug": "37-root-cause-tree", "bestFor": "Problem diagnosis, quality issues, operational failures", "matchId": "019de98a-55e1-76ea-b3ef-38f2e2b7e256", "evidence": "p6 central Government node fans into 5 challenge circles, p7-9 detail each with charts.", "position": 1, "objective": "Decompose fiscal weakness into 5 root causes", "structure": "The Problem -> Branch 1 (Cause A) -> Branch 2 (Cause B) -> Branch 3 (Cause C) -> The Primary Root", "confidence": 80, "description": "Branch out from a problem to its multiple contributing causes" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-54a0-722e-a491-86c4fa6a3eb0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt stock + 5 challenges to fiscus with charts", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 15, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart title mentions 2019/20, but the data covers three years.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 10, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019de98a-5611-735d-a9d9-9c7921f489f1", "evidence": "Sequence ends with explicit 'Spending Priorities' chevron after expenditure breakdowns.", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade rev/exp data into spending priorities", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 65, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 10, "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 15, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Data source: PwC Namibia Budget Review 2019/2020.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 10, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019de98a-5611-735d-a9d9-9c7921f489f1", "evidence": "Sequence ends with explicit 'Spending Priorities' chevron after expenditure breakdowns.", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade rev/exp data into spending priorities", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 65, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 10, "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 15, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart shows budget figures in N$ millions for 10 categories. The 'Other' category is missing a percentage label.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 10, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019de98a-5611-735d-a9d9-9c7921f489f1", "evidence": "Sequence ends with explicit 'Spending Priorities' chevron after expenditure breakdowns.", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade rev/exp data into spending priorities", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 65, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 10, "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 15, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays absolute values in N$ thousands, despite the title mentioning N$ millions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 10, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019de98a-5611-735d-a9d9-9c7921f489f1", "evidence": "Sequence ends with explicit 'Spending Priorities' chevron after expenditure breakdowns.", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade rev/exp data into spending priorities", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 65, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 10, "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 15, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 10, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019de98a-5611-735d-a9d9-9c7921f489f1", "evidence": "Sequence ends with explicit 'Spending Priorities' chevron after expenditure breakdowns.", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade rev/exp data into spending priorities", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 65, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 10, "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 15, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a chevron-based process flow to represent a prioritized list.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 10, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019de98a-5611-735d-a9d9-9c7921f489f1", "evidence": "Sequence ends with explicit 'Spending Priorities' chevron after expenditure breakdowns.", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade rev/exp data into spending priorities", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 65, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 10, "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 15, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de98a-5567-7574-b7e7-836bd7c7f68f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Debt, expenditure, revenue data", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a bubble-cluster diagram to emphasize 'Reigning in Expenditure' as the central focus.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 16, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019de98a-563e-756f-baf9-763f49090083", "evidence": "p16 names Quality Spending, Revenue Mobilization, Structural Reforms around expenditure control.", "position": 3, "objective": "Present consolidation as 3 mutually-exclusive pillars", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 78, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 10, "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart shows a dual-axis combination of bar (expenditure in N$) and line (expenditure as % of GDP).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 16, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019de98a-563e-756f-baf9-763f49090083", "evidence": "p16 names Quality Spending, Revenue Mobilization, Structural Reforms around expenditure control.", "position": 3, "objective": "Present consolidation as 3 mutually-exclusive pillars", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 78, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 10, "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide contrasts quantitative revenue forecasts with a qualitative list of structural reforms.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 16, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019de98a-563e-756f-baf9-763f49090083", "evidence": "p16 names Quality Spending, Revenue Mobilization, Structural Reforms around expenditure control.", "position": 3, "objective": "Present consolidation as 3 mutually-exclusive pillars", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 78, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 10, "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide highlights the fiscal consolidation efforts by tracking deficit and debt levels against GDP.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 16, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019de98a-563e-756f-baf9-763f49090083", "evidence": "p16 names Quality Spending, Revenue Mobilization, Structural Reforms around expenditure control.", "position": 3, "objective": "Present consolidation as 3 mutually-exclusive pillars", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 78, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 10, "beatId": "019de98a-54c7-75b1-9790-23096315bd1b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Rev/exp analysis + Priority Areas of Consolidation pillars", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a dramatic background image of a dead tree under a starry sky, likely to emphasize the 'low growth' theme.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 20, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de98a-5666-713e-9e01-d635f5afed04", "evidence": "p20/p25 explicitly chart Namibia vs regional and global GDP outlook.", "position": 4, "objective": "Contrast Namibia GDP/revenue vs region/global", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart title 'REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE COMPARISON: 2019/20' seems slightly mislabeled as it covers three years.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 20, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de98a-5666-713e-9e01-d635f5afed04", "evidence": "p20/p25 explicitly chart Namibia vs regional and global GDP outlook.", "position": 4, "objective": "Contrast Namibia GDP/revenue vs region/global", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 20, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de98a-5666-713e-9e01-d635f5afed04", "evidence": "p20/p25 explicitly chart Namibia vs regional and global GDP outlook.", "position": 4, "objective": "Contrast Namibia GDP/revenue vs region/global", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a donut chart for the revenue composition and horizontal bar charts for historical comparisons.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 20, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de98a-5666-713e-9e01-d635f5afed04", "evidence": "p20/p25 explicitly chart Namibia vs regional and global GDP outlook.", "position": 4, "objective": "Contrast Namibia GDP/revenue vs region/global", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "PwC Namibia Budget Review 2019/2020", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 20, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de98a-5666-713e-9e01-d635f5afed04", "evidence": "p20/p25 explicitly chart Namibia vs regional and global GDP outlook.", "position": 4, "objective": "Contrast Namibia GDP/revenue vs region/global", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a dramatic background image of a dead tree under a starry sky, likely to emphasize the 'low growth' theme.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 20, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de98a-5666-713e-9e01-d635f5afed04", "evidence": "p20/p25 explicitly chart Namibia vs regional and global GDP outlook.", "position": 4, "objective": "Contrast Namibia GDP/revenue vs region/global", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart highlights the fiscal pressure by comparing 2018 projections against 2019 projections for both revenue and expenditure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 20, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de98a-5666-713e-9e01-d635f5afed04", "evidence": "p20/p25 explicitly chart Namibia vs regional and global GDP outlook.", "position": 4, "objective": "Contrast Namibia GDP/revenue vs region/global", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 27, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de98a-568e-7786-87e6-9679f0e84c0d", "evidence": "Side-by-side 6-country teardrop charts for corporate tax and VAT.", "position": 5, "objective": "Position Namibia vs peers on tax rates", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 88, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a hanging drop chart visualization to display VAT percentages for Namibia, Angola, Botswana, South Africa, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 27, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de98a-568e-7786-87e6-9679f0e84c0d", "evidence": "Side-by-side 6-country teardrop charts for corporate tax and VAT.", "position": 5, "objective": "Position Namibia vs peers on tax rates", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 88, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "geographic_map", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "PwC Namibia Budget Review 2019/2020", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-29", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a gear-based process diagram to show how current economic factors are linked.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-30", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 30, "name": "Pivot", "slug": "17-pivot", "bestFor": "Project updates, board meetings, agile retrospectives", "matchId": "019de98a-56b8-727e-becb-8b7e619daafe", "evidence": "Gears diagram on p30 routes 3 dependencies into 'Agro-Processing' as new direction.", "position": 6, "objective": "Pivot from commodity dependence to agro-processing", "structure": "The Original Hypothesis -> The New Discovery -> The Strategic Shift", "confidence": 70, "description": "Validate a change in direction by showing it is a reaction to new intelligence, not failure" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-31", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 30, "name": "Pivot", "slug": "17-pivot", "bestFor": "Project updates, board meetings, agile retrospectives", "matchId": "019de98a-56b8-727e-becb-8b7e619daafe", "evidence": "Gears diagram on p30 routes 3 dependencies into 'Agro-Processing' as new direction.", "position": 6, "objective": "Pivot from commodity dependence to agro-processing", "structure": "The Original Hypothesis -> The New Discovery -> The Strategic Shift", "confidence": 70, "description": "Validate a change in direction by showing it is a reaction to new intelligence, not failure" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "size_opportunity", "notes": "The slide uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to represent regional market access and a pie chart for budget allocation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-32", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 30, "name": "Pivot", "slug": "17-pivot", "bestFor": "Project updates, board meetings, agile retrospectives", "matchId": "019de98a-56b8-727e-becb-8b7e619daafe", "evidence": "Gears diagram on p30 routes 3 dependencies into 'Agro-Processing' as new direction.", "position": 6, "objective": "Pivot from commodity dependence to agro-processing", "structure": "The Original Hypothesis -> The New Discovery -> The Strategic Shift", "confidence": 70, "description": "Validate a change in direction by showing it is a reaction to new intelligence, not failure" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de98a-54ef-70fd-8a87-ae8462ad8b9a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "GDP comparisons, peer tax benchmarks, agro-processing case", "position": 4, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019de98a-558f-77bb-a3c5-ab2ccffaa0e7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Consolidation priorities and benchmarks", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-33", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 41, "from": 33, "beatId": "019de98a-5517-74ae-ab2f-8b92f8ee39db", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Structural reforms, tax proposals, private sector close", "position": 5, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 39, "from": 33, "beatId": "019de98a-55b8-75e9-bbf9-8ca2e2d888bd", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Structural reforms and tax proposals", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "docSlug": "5fa11995162038d5", "documentTitle": "Namibia Budget on plate 2019-20", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 34, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The diagram uses a circular flow to represent interconnected reform initiatives.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe/34", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-3c69c0a14ebe#slide-34", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 41, "from": 33, "beatId": "019de98a-5517-74ae-ab2f-8b92f8ee39db", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Structural reforms, tax proposals, private sector close", "position": 5, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 39, "from": 33, "beatId": "019de98a-55b8-75e9-bbf9-8ca2e2d888bd", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Structural reforms and tax proposals", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }